
Hetzner DNS
io.github.ni-c由 GitHub 帳號 ni-c 發布v0.6.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Manage DNS zones and records (zonefiles, RRSets, TTL, protection) via the Hetzner Cloud API
概覽
讓助理透過 Hetzner Cloud API 管理 Hetzner Cloud DNS 區域與記錄集,包括區域檔案的匯入與匯出。
- 可以做什麼
- 提供列出、建立、更新與刪除 DNS 區域與 RRSet 的工具,可調整 TTL 與保護設定,並匯入或匯出 BIND 區域檔案。也能列出並查詢非同步區域操作,以便追蹤變更是否完成。結果同時以結構化內容與文字回傳,上游資料會標記為不受信任的資料。
- 適用情境
- 當助理需要讀取或修改 Hetzner Cloud 專案中的 DNS 記錄時使用,例如查看區域、新增或取代記錄、匯出區域檔案。它不適用於已停用的獨立 dns.hetzner.com API。
- 執行需求
- npm 套件需要 Node.js 22 或更新版本,也可使用已發佈的容器映像;伺服器以 stdio 在本機執行。必須在 HETZNER_API_TOKEN 中提供專案範圍的 Hetzner Cloud API 權杖,寫入工具需要具備讀寫權限的權杖。選用變數包括 HETZNER_READ_ONLY、HETZNER_ALLOW_TOOLS、HETZNER_DENY_TOOLS、ELICITATION 與 HETZNER_API_BASE_URL。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Hetzner DNS,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
hetzner-dns-mcp
[CI]
[OpenSSF Scorecard]
[Socket Badge]
[Glama score]
[npm version]
[container image]
[HTTP via mcp-hub]
[docs]
[sponsor]
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for managing DNS zones and records via the Hetzner Cloud API.
Lets MCP clients like Claude Code, Claude Desktop or Codex manage your Hetzner DNS: list, create, update and delete zones and RRSets (record sets), import/export zone files, manage protection and TTLs, and track asynchronous zone actions.
Twenty-two tools is the ceiling, not the floor: HETZNER_ALLOW_TOOLS=essential
registers a curated eight instead, and a model picks the right tool far more
reliably from eight than from twenty-two — see
choosing which tools load.
[An MCP client talks to hetzner-dns-mcp over stdio; the server exposes read and write tools for zones and record sets, asks a person before a destructive call, and calls the Hetzner Cloud DNS API over HTTPS with an API token]Note: This server targets the current DNS API that is part of the Hetzner Cloud API (
api.hetzner.cloud). The legacy DNS API (dns.hetzner.com) was shut down in May 2026 and is not supported.
What makes it different
Zones, record sets and the actions behind them. Listing, creating, updating and deleting zones and RRSets, importing and exporting BIND zone files, changing TTLs and protection — and following the asynchronous zone actions Hetzner queues behind a change, rather than reporting success and leaving you to guess.
Nothing upstream is trusted. Record values, comments and zone files come back wrapped as untrusted data, secret-looking keys are redacted, oversized values are truncated and HTML error pages are dropped instead of pasted into the context.
Destructive calls ask a person. Deleting a zone or replacing a record set raises a real dialog through MCP elicitation. Where the client cannot show one, the call is refused and carries a random single-use token that only ever appeared in a previous tool result — so nothing hidden inside a DNS record can mint it.
Requirements
- Node.js ≥ 24
- A Hetzner Cloud API token for the project that holds your DNS zones — create one in the Hetzner Cloud Console under your project → Security → API tokens. Use a read & write token for full functionality (a read-only token limits you to the read tools).
Configuration
Configuration is provided via environment variables:
Without a token the server still starts and lists its tools (so registries and inspectors can introspect it), but every tool call fails with setup instructions instead of reaching the API.
HETZNER_API_TOKEN and HETZNER_API_BASE_URL are deleted from the process
environment once they have been read, so a later crash report or diagnostic
dump cannot expose the token.
Choosing which tools load
HETZNER_ALLOW_TOOLS and HETZNER_DENY_TOOLS take comma-separated tool names;
a trailing * matches a whole family. essential is a curated preset —
list_zones, get_zone, list_rrsets, get_rrset, create_rrset,
set_records, delete_rrset and export_zonefile — which covers reading a
zone and changing a record without the rare, catastrophic tools.
An entry that matches no tool aborts startup and names it, so a typo cannot
silently hide a tool — an absent tool is not something anyone traces back to an
environment variable. A filtered tool is never registered, so it is absent from
tools/list and unknown to tools/call alike, exactly like a write tool under
HETZNER_READ_ONLY.
If you run several of these servers at once, mcp-hub
is the other answer — its /hub endpoint replaces every server's tools with six
meta-tools.
Installation
Claude Code
Claude Desktop
Add to your claude_desktop_config.json:
Codex
Add to your ~/.codex/config.toml:
From source
Docker
Multi-arch images (amd64/arm64) are published to GHCR with an SBOM and build provenance:
The image talks MCP over stdio, so clients need docker run -i (no port is
exposed):
Through mcp-hub
A client that cannot spawn a local process — ChatGPT connectors, Claude on the web,
Cursor, LibreChat — reaches hetzner-dns-mcp through mcp-hub: one
container serves many stdio MCP servers over Streamable HTTP, with an OAuth 2.1 login
behind a single password and long-lived tokens for the clients that cannot do OAuth. Its
/hub endpoint puts every server behind six meta-tools, so one connector reaches all of
them without N×tool schemas in the model's context, and it speaks both protocol revisions
— a question this server asks travels through it to the person at the far end.
Its /config/mcp.json uses Claude Code's format, so the entry is the one you already
have:
allowTools and denyTools there are the hub's own per-server filter, which is not
the same thing as *_ALLOW_TOOLS in env — the difference, and the mistake it invites,
are in the client guide.
Tools
Every tool declares an outputSchema and answers with structuredContent
alongside the text block, so a client can use the result without parsing prose.
The <untrusted-data> fence stays in the text — it is the readable presentation
of the same marker — and the structured half carries untrusted: true and
source: "hetzner-cloud-api" as fields. Every tool carries them: record
values, comments, labels and zone files are written by whoever controls the
zone, and no tool here answers with anything else.
The API documents are described as open objects with the top-level keys the spec guarantees. The API is not this server's to promise, and the SDK validates each result against its schema before it goes out — a strict shape would turn a field Hetzner adds into a tool that fails outright.
An over-budget result is now an error. It used to be cut off mid-document
and say so, which is fine for a text block and impossible for
structuredContent: the two channels have to carry the same value, and a
document sliced mid-string does not parse.
Zones
RRSets (record sets)
👤 asks a person through MCP elicitation · falls back to a two-call
confirm_token where the client cannot show a dialog.
Actions
Safety
A person is asked, not just told. Every irreversible tool — delete_zone,
delete_rrset, import_zonefile, set_records, remove_records,
change_primary_nameservers, and
change_zone_protection/change_rrset_protection when they remove protection —
raises a real dialog through MCP elicitation where the client supports it. The model
cannot answer it on its behalf, and nothing happens until an answer comes back.
Three more ask conditionally, because in DNS the dangerous act is making a claim
rather than withdrawing one: create_rrset and add_records for a name or type
that decides who answers (NS, DS, MX, CNAME, CAA, TLSA, SVCB,
HTTPS, SRV, the apex @, a wildcard), and create_zone when the call carries
primary_nameservers or a zonefile — the same payloads
change_primary_nameservers and import_zonefile are guarded for. The
confirmation binds every field the call will write, TTL and labels included, so a
token issued for one TTL cannot redeem another.
Where the client cannot show a dialog, the tool refuses its first call and returns a random, single-use token valid for five minutes; the second call must repeat the identical arguments and pass it:
Deliberately not a boolean the model can set on its own: the token exists only in a previous tool result, so an instruction hidden in a TXT record or a zone-file comment cannot manufacture one. But it proves the call was made twice with the same arguments and nothing more, and the fallback text says so rather than implying somebody approved.
Either way the approval is bound to what it is about. For set_records,
remove_records and import_zonefile that is a hash of the exact payload: an
approval for ["198.51.100.1"] will not write ["198.51.100.66"].
ELICITATION=false takes the fallback path deliberately, for a scheduled job or a
test harness. It never removes the guard. See
Asking a person.
The dialog is a guard rail, not a security boundary — the boundary is the permission prompt of your MCP host. Do not auto-approve these tools.
Untrusted upstream data. Everything the API returns is wrapped in an
<untrusted-data> envelope, because record values, comments, labels and zone files are
written by whoever controls the zone. Confirmation messages never quote that content;
they report counts and TTLs only. Keys that look like secrets (tsig_key, token,
secret, password) are redacted from results, oversized values are truncated, and
HTML error pages from an intermediate proxy are dropped rather than pasted into the
model's context.
Least privilege. Set HETZNER_READ_ONLY=true to register only the seven read
tools — the write tools then do not exist on the protocol at all, rather than failing
at call time. Combine it with a read-only Hetzner token for a genuinely read-only
setup.
Other guarantees.
- Tools carry MCP annotations (
readOnlyHint,destructiveHint,idempotentHint) so hosts can apply appropriate permission policies. HETZNER_API_BASE_URLmust be anhttpsURL (httpis only accepted for localhost) and must not contain credentials; a warning is printed when a non-default host is configured, because the API token is sent there.- Zone identifiers and RRSet names are validated against a strict character set — no slashes, no percent signs, no bare
.or..— so a request cannot escape the intended API path; requests never follow redirects, so the Bearer header cannot be replayed elsewhere. - TSIG keys passed to
create_zone/change_primary_nameserversbecome part of the conversation context and client transcripts — treat them as secrets and rotate them if in doubt. - Hetzner-side resource protection is honored: protected zones/RRSets return an error with a hint to the corresponding
change_*_protectiontool.
Not exposed, on purpose
Only the Hetzner Cloud DNS API. The standalone dns.hetzner.com API was shut
down in May 2026 and is not implemented — scripts still using it are broken for
reasons that have nothing to do with this server.
HETZNER_API_BASE_URL is not a provider switch. It exists to point at a local
mock during development, and is validated (HTTPS only, no credentials in the URL,
a warning on a non-default host) precisely because your token is sent there. The
request shapes are Hetzner's.
Safety
- DNS records are edited by whoever holds the token, so upstream values,
comments and zone files are marked as untrusted data — to be reported, never
followed, in both channels and behind a fence the data cannot close. Keys are
redacted by the suffix of their normalised name (
password,secret,token,apikey,privatekey,passphrase,tsigkey), values over 4 000 characters are truncated, control characters are stripped, and an HTML error page is dropped rather than pasted into the context. - Deleting a zone or replacing a record set asks a person: a real dialog through MCP elicitation, bound to the exact target. Where the client cannot show one, the call is refused and carries a random single-use token that only ever appeared in a previous tool result.
HETZNER_READ_ONLY=trueregisters the seven read tools and nothing else — a write tool is then absent fromtools/list, not refused when called.- Requests are hardened rather than trusted: zone identifiers are pattern-matched
so a path cannot escape, redirects are refused so the
Authorizationheader never follows one, every request times out after 30 seconds, request bodies are assembled from named fields only, and the base URL is validated (HTTPS, no credentials) before the token is ever sent to it. The token's own shape is checked before it reaches the HTTP layer, which would otherwise quote it back in an error; response bodies are read under a ceiling with the status decided first; and every response is shape-checked rather than cast, so a proxy's answer produces a readable result rather than a schema violation with no cause.
Documentation
The full guide, tool reference and security notes live at
hetzner-dns-mcp.ni-c.de (source in docs/).
Development
Releasing
- Bump the version in
package.json(npm version X.Y.Z --no-git-tag-version). - Rename the
[Unreleased]section inCHANGELOG.mdto the new version. - Commit, then tag and push:
git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "vX.Y.Z" && git push origin main vX.Y.Z.
The release workflow then runs the tests, publishes to npm via
Trusted Publishing (with
provenance), creates a GitHub release with the notes from the CHANGELOG and
updates the entry in the official
MCP Registry
(io.github.ni-c/hetzner-dns-mcp, via GitHub OIDC).
Releasing
Releases are tag-driven. Bump package.json, move the [Unreleased] notes in
CHANGELOG.md under the new version, commit, then:
The release workflow publishes to npm via Trusted Publishing (OIDC, with provenance), pushes the multi-arch container image to GHCR, creates the GitHub release from the CHANGELOG section, and updates the entry in the official MCP registry.
Contributing
Issues, discussions and pull requests are welcome — see CONTRIBUTING.md. For vulnerabilities please use private reporting rather than a public issue; the policy is in SECURITY.md.
License
MIT © Willi Thiel
來源:README.md,提交 ea674cb
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.6.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分