
Octopus Blackboard
io.github.octoryn由 GitHub 帳號 octoryn 發布v0.3.1更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Shared memory & coordination for AI coding agents — a blackboard, not an orchestrator.
發布方自己的服務:Octopus.do
概覽
一個本機優先的共享黑板,讓多個 AI 程式代理在同一個儲存庫上記錄認領、任務、決策、訊息和提交歸屬。
- 可以做什麼
- 讀寫黑板:查看狀態、時間軸、筆記、認領、風險、證據、檔案變更和決策,並在兩個代理認領同一工作或檔案時提出衝突提醒。協調任務:定義看板任務、指派到某個代理的收件匣、更新進度,以及傳送訊息、交接和心跳。追蹤歸屬:開始和結束工作階段、關聯提交、記錄 AI 或人工審查,並查詢誰改過某個檔案、解釋某次提交、追溯某一行或列出未經審查的 AI 提交。治理與移轉:執行唯讀的 CI 檢查、匯出和匯入帶簽章的歸屬包、產生提交 trailer、簽章並驗證雜湊鏈、清理或去識別化條目,以及匯入 CLI 工作階段紀錄。
- 適用情境
- 當多個 AI 程式代理或 CLI 在同一個程式碼儲存庫上工作時適用,可讓它們看到彼此的認領、決策和檔案變更,並保留可稽核、可重播的紀錄,說明哪次提交由哪個代理產生。
- 執行需求
- 透過 npx 以本機 stdio 程序執行,需要 Node 22 或更新版本。黑板目錄(.octoboard/)會從工作目錄往上尋找或自動建立,也可用 OCTOBOARD_DIR 指定。代理身分來自 OCTOBOARD_AGENT,預設值為 anon。選用的 Postgres 同步需要 pg 驅動程式。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Octopus Blackboard,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
Octopus Blackboard
A shared memory and coordination layer for AI coding agents.
Agents do not need another boss. They need a shared blackboard.
Part of Octopus Core — the open infrastructure stack for governed AI. One job per repo, along the agent lifecycle: Scout · Observe · Experience · Blackboard · Workstate · Runtime · Replay — with Inspect governing every stage. The whole stack rides one root primitive — Evidence, the canonical, tamper-evident atom that is the root category everything is built on.
This repo — Blackboard · Coordinate: Shared cognition for coding agents.
Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and your local agents all work on the same repo — but they are blind to each other. One refactors auth while another rewrites the same file. Context is scattered across CLIs. Nobody can replay what happened.
Octopus Blackboard is not an orchestrator. It does not schedule agents, trigger them, or decide anything on their behalf. It is a passive, local-first shared memory that answers six questions:
Every agent only needs to be able to read the board, write the board, leave messages, and attach evidence. That's the whole contract.
Why
Enterprises are not primarily afraid that agents aren't smart enough. They are afraid that:
- Multiple AI tools edit the same code simultaneously
- Context is scattered across different CLIs
- There is no shared memory, no audit, no handoff
- There is no conflict awareness and no way to replay
The blackboard cuts straight through this. Every write appends a
tamper-evident, hash-chained entry to an append-only timeline, so the
entire history is auditable and replayable — and any after-the-fact edit to an
earlier entry breaks verification.
Get Started in 2 Minutes
Blackboard is the easiest way into the Octopus stack — pure coordination memory that works today with just Claude Code and Cursor, no orchestrator required. One command sets everything up:
That single command: creates the local board (.octoboard/) if it isn't there,
auto-detects your MCP client (.claude/ → Claude Code, .cursor/ → Cursor,
… otherwise a generic snippet), prints the exact paste-ready config for it,
and proves the board works with one write + one read.
Then just:
- Paste the printed config block into the file it names.
- Reload your MCP client (restart it, or reopen the project).
- You're done. Ask your agent to call
board_status, thenboard_note "hello"— that's your first board action, on a shared, tamper-evident timeline.
Re-running quickstart is always safe: it never clobbers an existing board or
its history. New to the idea of adopting a coordination layer first? See
Why adopt Blackboard first.
Install
Requires Node ≥ 22. The board is a single SQLite file under .octoboard/,
discovered by walking up from your working directory (like .git).
See it in action
examples/two-agents.sh plays out the flagship
scenario — Claude Code and Codex sharing one board on the same repo: a claim
conflict, a live same-file collision, a decision, attribution, a handoff that
lands in the other agent's inbox, an AI review, the human-approval CI gate
(blocked → passes), the accountability scorecard, blame→narrative, and a
verified hash chain with session signatures. Run it in an empty directory:
CLI
Identity is set with --as <agent> or the OCTOBOARD_AGENT environment
variable. Point at a specific board with --board <dir> or OCTOBOARD_DIR.
Conflict awareness
The board never blocks — it surfaces. If two agents claim the same key, or touch the same task's files, both writes are recorded and the second agent is warned:
AI attribution & shared development memory
Git records who pushed a commit. It does not record which AI agent produced the code, in which session, on which machine, whether another AI reviewed it, or whether a human approved it. As AI-native development becomes common, accountability must move beyond Git authorship.
The blackboard adds an attribution layer on top of Git — it never rewrites history. Git stays the source of code; the blackboard becomes the source of attribution.
Sessions
A session is one continuous execution of an agent, and the unit attribution hangs off. Starting one makes every subsequent write attribute to it (the active session is remembered across CLI invocations, per agent):
Identity is fully provider-independent — --provider, --model, --cli, or
the matching OCTOBOARD_* env vars. Any AI CLI (local or cloud) can register
itself with no assumptions about a specific vendor.
Linking commits
blackboard link <rev> reads the files a commit touched (via Git) and records
one attribution per file for the active session. Optionally it writes an
additive git notes entry under refs/notes/blackboard:
Reviews
Querying the shared memory
Example explain:
Every attribution, review, session, and decision is also recorded in the
hash-chained timeline, so the full accountability history is tamper-evident
and replayable. blackboard and octoboard are the same command.
Governance & accountability chain
The point of attribution is to enforce something. The chain from work to a merge gate:
CI gate (check)
Turn queries into an enforceable gate. Read-only — it reports pass/fail and exits non-zero; the CI system decides what to do. The blackboard never blocks.
Portability (export / import / trailers)
Attribution is local-first; these make it survive git push into a team board
or CI:
import is idempotent (keyed by row id). The bundle carries attributions,
reviews, sessions, and related decisions.
Subscribe (watch)
Complete the read/write/subscribe/message contract. Passive: it polls and reports; it never pushes work.
Signed sessions (sign / verify)
Minimal identity (v0): each session gets an Ed25519 keypair (private key stays
local under .octoboard/keys/, gitignored). Signing the timeline head lets
verify distinguish trusted state from merely asserted:
A session auto-signs its head on session stop. A signature over a head becomes
stale the moment any earlier history is altered — so tampering is visible
even though the signature itself stays cryptographically valid. This is not yet
a full PKI (no key distribution or revocation).
Ingesting CLI transcripts
Populate the board from a CLI's session transcript instead of calling the API by hand — file edits, decisions, and notes flow onto the active session:
claude-code/codex/gemini/grok use a conservative tool-use JSONL
heuristic (it finds file edits from file_path/notebook_path and
patch/write tool calls). generic reads a normalized schema — the stable
integration path for any CLI:
Team backend
Boards stay local-first; sync shares the portable attribution records (never a board's private hash chain) into a team store — a shared file or Postgres.
export signs the bundle with your active session key; import verifies it and
import --require-signed refuses unsigned or tampered bundles — so imported
attribution has origin authenticity, not just id-dedup.
Tamper-evidence goes further than the in-DB chain if you anchor the head externally:
Liveness and compliance:
prune never touches the append-only timeline (the audit trail). redact
blanks the content across every read path — the timeline overlay and the
underlying source row (a message body, evidence note, etc.) so inbox/status/
the dashboard can't leak it — while keeping the hash chain valid. It is not
cryptographic erasure: the original summary stays in the timeline row so the
chain still verifies, so don't store secrets you must be able to destroy. For
tamper-evidence against an attacker with database write access, anchor the head
hash externally (a commit, a log, a second machine) — verify shows an
unanchored warning when it can't confirm the tail.
Tasks & kanban
Tasks are kanban cards — number, content, owner (which agent / CLI), project, blast radius, risk, and live progress. "Notifying an agent" is passive: assigning a task drops a "please look at task #N" message in that agent's inbox; the agent reads it and decides to act — the board never launches anyone.
[The read-only blackboard serve dashboard, a live kanban of tasks]
The live blackboard serve dashboard — read-only, auto-refreshing. Each card
shows the task number, progress bar, assignees, active-agent count (⚡), project,
and a risk-coloured border.
The read-only serve dashboard renders these as a live kanban (columns by
status; each card shows number, title, a progress bar, assignees, active-agent
count, project, and a risk-coloured left border). Agents drive it via the MCP
tools board_task_define, board_assign, board_progress, board_tasks — an
agent calls board_progress as it works so the bar moves in real time.
Visibility
The dashboard is dependency-free (node:http), strictly read-only (non-GET is
refused), and auto-refreshes: live timeline, sessions, conflict/attribution
state, and the accountability scorecard.
MCP server — connect any CLI
The blackboard speaks standard MCP over stdio, so any MCP-capable client (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, VS Code, Windsurf, …) can read and write the board. Generate the exact config for your client in one step:
Each prints where to paste it and the ready-to-use snippet, e.g.:
The agent identity defaults to the client name (so Cursor writes as cursor,
Codex as codex); override with --agent. The board is auto-discovered from
.octoboard/ in the working directory, or pin it with --dir. Two CLIs
pointed at the same .octoboard/ now share one board — that's the whole point.
Tools exposed — coordination: board_status, board_timeline, board_note,
board_claim, board_task_define, board_task, board_tasks, board_assign,
board_progress, board_message, board_inbox, board_handoffs,
board_decision, board_evidence, board_file_changed, board_risk,
board_handoff, board_heartbeat, board_since; attribution: session_start,
session_stop, board_link, board_attribute, board_review, board_who,
board_explain, board_blame, board_unreviewed, board_report; governance &
portability: board_check, board_export, board_import, board_trailers,
board_sign, board_trust, board_prune, board_redact, board_ingest. Each
accepts an optional agent argument to override the acting identity per call.
The recommended pattern: an agent calls board_status before starting work
to see what everyone else is doing, and writes as it goes.
Data model
timeline is the append-only hash chain every other write also records into, so
the board and its audit log can never diverge.
Architecture
Status
Public beta (v0.3). Working today: local SQLite board, CLI (octoboard /
blackboard), MCP server, a verifiable hash-chained timeline, first-class
sessions, provider-independent AI/human attribution keyed to Git commits,
reviews, the query layer (who, explain, commits, unreviewed, joint),
the read-only serve dashboard, signed import/export bundles, retention,
redaction, quickstart, and MCP registry metadata/publishing workflow. Git
integration is read-only plus additive git notes — history is never rewritten.
Team sync supports a shared JSON file and a Postgres target for portable
attribution records; the board's private hash chain remains local by design.
Change subscriptions and deeper Octopus cross-repo bridges are still roadmap
work.
License
Apache-2.0 © Octoryn. See LICENSE.
來源:README.md,提交 6ddc0fe
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.3.1最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分
其他 Octopus 整合
Octopus.do
do.octopus官方發布者
一個遠端 MCP 伺服器,讓助理以已登入使用者的身分讀取和編輯 Octopus.do 視覺化網站地圖中的頁面、區塊與審閱備註。

Octopus Energy (octopus-mcp)
由 GitHub 帳號 mattoddie 發布
給英國 Octopus Energy 用戶的非官方 MCP 伺服器,讓助理讀取智慧電表用量、費用、電價與帳單,並可選擇管理電動車充電與 Saving Sessions。

Codex Octopus
由 GitHub 帳號 xiaolai 發布
封裝 OpenAI Codex SDK,讓助理把多個各自獨立設定的 Codex 代理當成工具執行,每個代理有自己的模型、沙箱與指令。

Claude Octopus
由 GitHub 帳號 xiaolai 發布
封裝 Claude Agent SDK,讓助理以 MCP 工具形式執行多個獨立設定的 Claude Code 代理,並提供時間軸、工作階段紀錄與報告。

Octopus Energy
由 GitHub 帳號 pipeworx-io 發布
Octopus Energy 公共 API MCP — 英國能源資費與產品。AI 翻譯