
Seven Dpt Mcp
io.github.pierreb4由 GitHub 帳號 pierreb4 發布v0.1.5更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Feynman's twelve-problems method as an MCP server: dormant problems + an evoke loop for new tricks.
概覽
一個本機 MCP 伺服器,保存一組長期問題,並提供用新想法檢驗這些問題的迴圈。
- 可以做什麼
- 它把大約十二個長期問題持久保存在本機 JSON 檔案中,並提供新增、更新、列出與檢視問題的工具。evoke 工具接收一個新技巧或方法,回傳已儲存的問題以及用來重新框定問題的鷹架。spark(帶有下一步的候選想法)可以被記錄、更新結果,並透過喚醒條件評估,讓成熟的项目浮現。
- 適用情境
- 如果你希望助理跨專案與工作階段攜帶一組穩定的開放問題,並用新方法不斷檢驗它們,就值得加入。它適合想法會長期累積的研究型或探索型工作。它不是任務管理器,也不是通用筆記庫。
- 執行需求
- 以本機 stdio 程序執行,通常透過 npm 套件 seven-dpt-mcp 搭配 npx 啟動,需要 Node.js。不需要帳號或 API 金鑰。狀態保存在 ~/.local/share/seven-dpt/store.json 的 JSON 檔案中,可用環境變數 SEVEN_DPT_DB 覆寫。僅支援桌面端。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Seven Dpt Mcp,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
seven-dpt-mcp
A tiny, local MCP server that gives Claude (in any project) a persistent set of long-running problems and a loop for cracking them — Feynman's twelve favorite problems method, driven by the tripartite model of inspiration.
- Feynman's method (via Gian-Carlo Rota): keep ~a dozen problems dormant in mind; every time you meet a new trick, test it against all of them.
- Inspiration = evocation + transcendence + approach motivation (Thrash & Elliot): a stimulus evokes a possibility, you transcend the problem's current framing, then you're motivated to act on it.
The server holds state and scaffolding; the connected model does the thinking — no LLM runs inside the server, no API key.
Tools
Storage: ~/.local/share/seven-dpt/store.json (override with SEVEN_DPT_DB). One store,
shared by every project = one brain.
Wake conditions (0.1.4)
Retiring a problem parks it with a re-open trigger — but a trigger written in prose is a
wait owned by "someone will remember." A wakeCondition makes it computable: a small
predicate (all/any over atoms like sparkCount, a date gate, fileMatches /
fileLines / fileCount on a path, or an explicit manual note) attached when you
retire/solve a problem (update_problem), park a spark (update_spark), or capture one
born gated (capture_spark). The ambient digest evaluates every condition at session
start and surfaces what's ripe (with an act/re-park pointer), what's ripening (with
current/target progress), and — loudly — any condition whose source became unreadable:
a wake source that vanished must scream, not sit at 0% forever. Everything echoes its aim
(prior-ledger.jsonl 12/20), so a wrong path or unit is visible when you arm it, not
months later. No auto-reopen: ripeness is surfaced, you decide. --wake prints the full
ledger from the CLI.
Claim typing (0.1.5)
A parked spark with a wake condition can revive — but nothing says when it may die, so
an unfalsifiable hope can ride the digest forever. 0.1.5 gives every spark an optional
claim-typing trio, all write-once on the same anti-hindsight model as prior:
claimType—universal("this always holds") vsexistential-bounded("this holds somewhere, within a stated frame"). A frame-bounded null is not a claim-failure; typing the claim keeps a frame-kill from being read as a lever-kill.forbids— one concrete observation the spark rules out. If nothing is forbidden, nothing can refute it, and the spark is a mood, not a claim.exhaustion— the retirement predicate, the dual ofwakeCondition: the condition under which the spark is abandoned rather than re-parked.
Set them at capture, or backfill later while unset (update_spark); revision after the
fact is refused with a visible notice — rewriting what a claim forbids after seeing results
is the conventionalist stratagem the fields exist to block. ledger_invariants.py flags
ORPHANED-EXISTENTIAL sparks (parked with a wake, no exhaustion — can revive but never
die), and calibration.py stamps the claimType mix of every scored cohort.
How it bootstraps
On first run (no store file yet), the store seeds itself with seven-dpt's own three open
product problems — auto-detection of recurring issues, the background-spend policy, and
proactive surfacing. Design decision,
made deliberately: the seeds are tool-generic (identical for every install, about the
tool rather than about you), so the server dogfoods its own method from minute one and the
ambient digest has something to show before you add your own problems. They are ordinary
rows in your store — edit, replace, or clear them freely; an existing store is never
touched. So the moment it runs it is already "taking care of its own problems": while you
work on anything else, those sit in context and can be sparked by unrelated discoveries.
The policy for how/when/how-much to chase background problems is deliberately not
coded — it's meant to be learned later from the accumulated spark → outcome history,
which is why update_spark exists.
That history is the reward channel: each spark carries a prior (your stated probability-it-works
at capture — immutable afterwards, so stated credences can be calibrated against realized outcomes
once enough sparks resolve), a costToOpen (the forward effort estimate, set at capture and
preserved), a cost (the actual effort, once chased to a verdict), and a value
(graded payoff, 0 for a miss). analysis/reservation_value.py turns it into a Pandora's-Box / Gittins
reservation-value ranking — but it gates on data sufficiency and refuses to emit numbers until enough
resolved sparks (with cost + value, including failures) accrue, so the policy is never fit on false
precision. A Bayesian companion, analysis/reservation_value_bayes.py, was retired on 2026-10-10
(it is in git history): nothing ever invoked it, and the de-bias map it applied to spark priors was
fitted on another program's ledger, where it has the opposite sign to this store's own sparks.
analysis/calibration.py is the audit half of the prior loop: it scores stated priors against realized
outcomes (reliability table, Brier/skill, drift check) from any two-line JSONL ledger of
pre-registered priors + resolutions, and --json persists that ledger's de-bias map and buckets for
analysis/self_check.py. No map is applied to spark priors. The store's own reading — resolved sparks'
mean stated prior against the share that worked, with a Wilson interval — is one line of the session
digest once ten sparks with a prior have resolved, and --priors lists each spark's prior beside its
outcome. --split YYYY-MM-DD partitions the curve at a changepoint (a model upgrade re-prices
estimates — don't pool across one untested), and a scope stamp reports the claimType mix of scored pairs,
since a frame-bounded null scored as a claim-failure is the one bias the audit can't see from numbers
alone. analysis/ledger_invariants.py audits the program the same ledger records, not any
single probe: deterministic invariants for the failure class where every result is locally sound and the
project is still wrong — a park-streak check (K straddles-zero verdicts in a row on the primary metric
means the instrument, not the ideas, is the suspect), power-at-preregistration (a gate below the banked
MDE is unresolvable before it runs), channel-liveness stamps, and ORPHANED-EXISTENTIAL (a parked spark
with a wake but no exhaustion can revive but never die — unfalsifiable-in-practice spend). It reports
its own note-classification coverage, exits 1 on alerts, supports --asof retrodiction, and --json
emits ALERT markers a hook or wakeCondition (fileMatches on the output) can gate on.
Install (turn on for all projects)
Via npm (recommended)
Published on npm — no build step. Register it for every project (user scope):
From source (alternative)
Then make the problems ambient — merge into ~/.claude/settings.json so every
session opens with your dormant problems in context:
(Installed from source instead? Replace each command with an absolute node path +
/absolute/path/to/seven-dpt-mcp/dist/index.js --digest — hooks don't source your shell
profile, so nvm-style setups need the absolute path.)
(--digest prints nothing when no problems are open; a fresh install prints the three
seeded ones — that's the bootstrap working, not noise.)
Validate the idea
- Add a few of your own long-running problems —
add_problem. - When you hit an interesting technique in any repo,
evokeit; watch Claude test it against every problem and reframe the ones that light up. - Let it
capture_sparkthe hits, thenupdate_sparkonce you've tried them. - Days later,
get_problem— if that accumulated trail feels useful, the idea's proven.
Known MVP limits (intentional)
- JSON file, last-write-wins (fine for one user).
evokematching is done by the connected model, not pre-ranked by embeddings.
License
Apache-2.0 — see LICENSE.
來源:README.md,提交 b16635f
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.1.5最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分