Bounceban

io.github.pipeworx-iov0.1.0更新於 Oct 9, 2026

BounceBan MCP — wraps the BounceBan email-verification API (bounceban.com)

已驗證Streamable HTTP可網頁執行Data & AnalyticsCommunication & Collaboration

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

透過 BounceBan 的 waterfall API 驗證單一電子郵件地址,回報有效性、catch-all、一次性、角色與免費信箱標記。

功能
只提供一個工具 bounceban_verify,接收電子郵件地址與 API 金鑰,回傳驗證狀態或結果,以及明確的 catch-all 標記與一次性、角色、免費信箱標記。它呼叫 BounceBan 的 waterfall 專用主機,該主機會阻塞最長約 80 秒以回傳確定結果,而不是回傳需要輪詢的任務。伺服器端逾時會以獨立的具名錯誤呈現。閘道連線還會列出共用的 Pipeworx 中繼工具,例如 ask_pipeworx、discover_tools 與 remember/recall。
適用情境
當助理需要在寄送前檢查電子郵件地址是否可投遞時,或作為電子郵件充實流程中的一個驗證器時使用。它適合需要 catch-all 偵測與單一阻塞式判定、而非非同步任務的工作流程。
執行需求
使用 Pipeworx 閘道的遠端端點,或透過 npx 在本機以 Node.js 執行 npm 套件 @pipeworx/mcp-bounceban。需要 BounceBan API 金鑰,作為 _apiKey 參數傳入,並透過 Authorization 標頭傳送,不帶 Bearer 前綴。需要存取 BounceBan API 的網路連線。本機 stdio 模式不需要 Pipeworx 帳號。
安裝前請注意
需要自備 BounceBan API 金鑰,此整合不提供金鑰,金鑰透過 Authorization 標頭傳輸。README 說明回應欄位名稱與狀態列舉是根據公開文件推斷,未經實際成功回應確認,因此解析可能不可靠。閘道端點還會暴露共用中繼工具,會增加模型上下文中的工具結構描述。這是非官方整合,與上游供應商無關。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Bounceban,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。

其他 MCP 客戶端

把它新增到你客戶端的 mcpServers 設定中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "bounceban": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bounceban/mcp"
    }
  }
}

README

@pipeworx/bounceban

Verify a single email address via BounceBan's waterfall-tuned endpoint (bounceban.com), including catch-all detection. Part of enrich-waterfall's enrich_verify_email ordered verifiers (fleet #2860).

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1743+ live data sources. This is an independent, unofficial integration — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or published by the upstream provider.

Tools

  • bounceban_verify(email, _apiKey) — status/result, explicit catch_all, disposable/role/free flags.

Auth

BYO only. Pass your BounceBan API key as _apiKey (header Authorization, no Bearer prefix). Find your key at https://bounceban.com/app/api/settings. No platform key (D4).

Data sources

  • https://api-waterfall.bounceban.com/v1/verify/single — BounceBan's waterfall-specific host, built to block synchronously (up to 80s) for a definitive result rather than handing back a task to poll. BounceBan also publishes a standard api.bounceban.com host for the same verb; this pack deliberately uses the waterfall one since that is the shape enrich_verify_email needs.

Verification notes (fleet #2860, 2026-10-08, no vendor key held)

  • Edge-probed the EXACT host/path this pack calls. No Authorization header: HTTP 401 {"error":"Authorization header is required"}. An invalid key: HTTP 401 {"msg":"Authorization information is missing or invalid."}. Two different bodies for two different failures confirms the header is read, not just a blanket 401. This pack's code checks both error and msg fields when surfacing the reason.
  • BounceBan documents a 408 for a timed-out verification (its own waterfall-integration guide) — this pack surfaces that as a named, distinct error ("verification timed out server-side") rather than letting it fall through to a generic HTTP-error path, since a caller retrying or moving to the next verifier needs to know it was a timeout, not a bad email or a bad key.
  • Response field names (status/result, is_catch_all) are inferred from BounceBan's public no-code-integration docs and GitHub skill-email-verification description, not a confirmed live success payload — we hold no BounceBan key. The parser accepts either is_catch_all/catch_all as a boolean, or falls back to checking whether the status string itself contains "catch" if neither field is present.
  • Not verified (no key held): the exact field name BounceBan uses for the main verdict (status vs result); the full enumeration of status values beyond "catch-all" and the obvious valid/invalid.

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "bounceban": {      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bounceban/mcp"    }  }}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/bounceban/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx, discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "pipeworx": {      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"    }  }}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1743+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

No MCP client? Call it over HTTP

This pack takes your own API key (_apiKey) — we don't front one for it, so there's no curl here that would run without it. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/bounceban_verify. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.

Standalone (no gateway account)

This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:

json
{  "mcpServers": {    "bounceban": {      "command": "npx",      "args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-bounceban"]    }  }}

Or run it directly to confirm it starts:

bash
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-bounceban

It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Bounceban data" })

The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.

More

License

MIT

來源:README.md,提交 99dbc8e

工具

0
工具後設資料尚未被收錄。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.0最新Oct 9, 2026