
Hosaka
io.github.plus8bit由 GitHub 帳號 plus8bit 發布v0.3.2更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Company facts for AI agents: which vendors a company uses, proven from DNS. Paid in USDC.
發布方自己的服務:hosaka music data
概覽
Hosaka 是本地 MCP 伺服器,按次以 Base 上的 USDC 付費,販售公司概況:可由 DNS 證實的供應商、聯絡方式與人員。
- 可以做什麼
- 查詢公司網域的註冊年數、註冊商、郵件與 DNS 供應商、DMARC、HTTPS 及供應商數量
- 取得該公司可被證實的所有第三方供應商清單,每項附上作為證據的 DNS 或 SPF 紀錄
- 取得公司自行公開的電子郵件與電話
- 取得在該公司任職的具名人員,並附帶供應商清單
- 各工具分別定價,便宜的問題不必為昂貴的答案付費
- 適用情境
- 當助理需要事實性的公司調查——某公司實際使用哪些 SaaS 供應商,或公開的聯絡方式——且使用者願意按次以 USDC 支付幾分錢、而不想註冊資料供應商時適用。
- 執行需求
- 透過 npx hosaka-mcp 在本機執行(需要 Node.js)。需要環境變數 HOSAKA_PRIVATE_KEY:一個在 Base 上持有少量 USDC 的錢包,於本機簽署付款。需要能連線至商店端點,可用 HOSAKA_URL 覆寫。無需註冊或 API 金鑰。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Hosaka,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
deadchannel & Hosaka
Two services that sell to AI agents over x402, paid per call in USDC. No signup, no API key, no subscription — an agent calls, pays, and gets an answer.
Agents can install Hosaka as a skill, which tells them what it is for and when to reach for it:
Hosaka — company data for agents
Available as an MCP server, so any MCP client can buy from it directly:
HOSAKA_PRIVATE_KEY is a wallet holding a little USDC on Base. Four tools at
four prices, so a cheap question never pays for an expensive answer:
Why the dossier is worth having. A company proves it owns its domain to every SaaS product it buys by placing a DNS verification record, and authorises every sender it uses in its SPF record. Those two lists are a purchase history the company published itself.
Asking for figma.com returns Anthropic, OpenAI, Adobe, Atlassian, MongoDB
Atlas, Greenhouse, Docusign, Stripe, Notion, Dropbox and Zendesk — each with the
exact record that proves it, so a buyer can check rather than trust.
Page fingerprints require a loaded script or CDN host, never a mention: a site listing a vendor's logo among its integrations is not a site that uses it.
Live at hosaka-agents.vercel.app.
deadchannel — a risk oracle for x402 endpoints
Give it a URL, it tells an agent whether that endpoint is alive, honestly priced, and safe to call — without spending a cent.
Roughly 17% of probed x402 endpoints are dead or traps, and the Bazaar discovery layer ships no ranking, quality, or reputation signal by its own admission. An agent picking from that catalog is guessing with real money.
What it checks
Every verdict comes from unpaid 402 responses, which is what makes it cheap
enough to run across a whole catalog.
Verdicts: live, degraded, trap, testnet, dead, unknown, plus a
bounded 0–100 risk score.
Use
Requires Node 22+. There are no runtime dependencies — types are stripped natively, so there is no build step and nothing to audit but this repo.
Exit code is non-zero when any target is a trap or dead, so it drops into CI
as a guard against shipping an agent pointed at a bad endpoint.
First full catalog scan — 20 Aug 2026
node src/scan.ts --live 150 pulls every resource the public Bazaar facilitators
publish and audits it. Results over 14,979 resources:
Median price $0.01, range $0 to $1,000, 316,927 paid calls in 30 days.
The catalog is in better shape than the folklore suggests. What it is not is evenly distributed: three addresses list 2,750 resources between them and receive one call in eighty, which makes them roughly 15x over-represented relative to the demand they serve. Catalog size is not catalog depth.
A correction, and the guard against repeating it
An earlier version of this table claimed 89.8% of the catalog published no tags.
That was wrong. The loader read extensions.bazaar.tags only, while most
publishers put tags on the item root — the real figure is 40.9%.
The bug survived review because nothing asserted the positive count. A check
that only ever counts what is missing cannot tell "publishers omit this" apart
from "we are looking in the wrong place." test/catalog.test.ts now hand-counts
tags across all three known locations in a captured 200-item slice of the live
catalog and asserts the loader matches exactly, in both directions.
Notes from the wild
Built against live endpoints, not the spec alone:
- v2 moves payment requirements into a base64
payment-requiredheader and leaves the body as{}. A parser that only reads the body marks the official reference endpoint as dead. - v2 sends CAIP-2 network ids (
eip155:84532,solana:EtWTRA…) where v1 sent friendly names. Both are live simultaneously. - v2 renames
maxAmountRequiredtoamountand hoists sharedresourcemetadata to the payload root. - Several servers omit the top-level
x402Versionthe reference implementations all send, and some nestaccepts[]one level deeper than documented. Both are parsed and reported as warnings rather than rejected. - Most resources are POST. Probing them with GET returns 404/405, which looks exactly like a dead endpoint — it put our first live-probe dead rate at 25% when the real figure is 2.7%. The verb comes from the catalog now, with a POST retry when it is unknown. Any x402 index reporting a high dead rate is worth checking for this.
- Discovery metadata is scattered. The spec puts
serviceName/tagson the ResourceInfo object, the CDP catalog flattens them onto the item root, and a minority nest them underextensions.bazaar. Read one location and you will undercount by half. - Brokered rails exist. AWS Marketplace resources name the payee with a URN
under an
aws:basenetwork instead of a chain address. That is legitimate, but the funds go to the broker, so it is reported as a warning rather than scored as an invalid payout.
Selling
The service sells its own check over x402. src/server/ implements the seller
side of the v2 HTTP transport: PAYMENT-REQUIRED out, PAYMENT-SIGNATURE in,
PAYMENT-RESPONSE back, in the authorization flow — verify, run the resource,
then settle.
No private key is involved. A seller declares where settlement should land;
the buyer signs and the facilitator broadcasts. The payout address is therefore
public information and lives in deadchannel.config.json, where anyone can
audit it, rather than in a dashboard where nobody can.
Settlement runs only after the probe produced a result, so a failure on our side costs the buyer nothing.
GET /facilitator exists because a wrong credential otherwise stays invisible
until someone tries to pay, and the first to discover it would be a customer.
Live
The service is deployed at https://deadchannel.vercel.app, selling on Base mainnet at $0.005 per call and settling through the Coinbase facilitator.
First settled payment: 0x6ac4a22c,
block 50230005, 20 Aug 2026. Gas was paid by the facilitator, not the buyer —
in x402 the buyer only signs, so a wallet holding nothing but USDC can pay.
npm run validate re-runs the 25 preflight checks the Bazaar applies before it
will index a resource, and reports whether the listing is currently active. It
needs no key and moves no money.
Hosaka
A second shop on the same payout address, selling company facts to agents.
Live at https://hosaka-agents.vercel.app, settling on Base mainnet.
Profiles are assembled from four sources that need no key and no supplier: DNS over HTTPS, the RDAP registry, the TLS handshake and the homepage. Cost per profile is zero — the margin is in the assembly.
The interesting part is vendor detection. A company proves ownership to every SaaS product it buys by placing a DNS verification record, and authorises every sender it uses in its SPF record. Those two lists are a purchase history the company published itself. Every claim carries the record that proves it, so a buyer can check rather than trust.
Using it from Claude or ChatGPT
The Bazaar's search ignores the query and ranks by unique payers, so a new shop is invisible there regardless of quality. MCP is the channel that works on day one — the agent is already in a client that speaks it.
The buyer brings their own wallet: the key signs the payment locally and never leaves the machine. Without it the tools say what is missing instead of failing mid-conversation.
Development
License
MIT
來源:README.md,提交 6a85e58
工具
0版本歷史
1- v0.3.2最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 40%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分
請在儲存庫或註冊中心條目中宣告授權條款。