Email Verifier (SMTP, MX, Catch-All)

io.github.sumitrmardy由 GitHub 帳號 sumitrmardy 發布v1.0.0更新於 Oct 27, 2026

Bulk email verification: live SMTP mailbox check, MX, catch-all, disposable and role detection.

已驗證Streamable HTTP可網頁執行溝通與協作商業與電商

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

託管於 Apify 的 MCP 伺服器,讓助理透過語法、DNS/MX、一次性/角色偵測與即時 SMTP 握手批次驗證電子郵件地址。

可以做什麼
  • 批次驗證電子郵件地址,回傳 deliverable、undeliverable、risky 或 unknown 狀態,以及分數和十一項固定檢查旗標。
  • 辨識一次性信箱、角色信箱、免費信箱服務商、catch-all 網域與灰名單情況,並以 sub_status 說明每個判定原因。
  • 回傳結構化的逐筆地址結果,方便程式與代理依此分支處理,包括對 unknown 結果的重試建議。
  • 透過 Apify Actor 分批處理大量清單,同步執行上限 300 秒,超過則改用非同步模式。
適用情境
適合在冷郵件開發前清理潛在客戶或註冊清單、在註冊流程攔阻一次性信箱,或提供代理一個判斷地址是否適合寄信的工具。也適合需要每筆地址都有穩定、非空判定而非儀表板的流程。
執行需求
遠端 MCP 端點 mcp.apify.com,使用 OAuth 登入;不支援 OAuth 的用戶端可用 Authorization 標頭攜帶 Apify API 權杖。呼叫 API 需要 Apify 帳號,有免費額度。需要能連線至 Apify 平台的網路。
安裝前請注意
依取得判定的地址計費,包含 undeliverable 與 unknown 結果;重複地址也會計費,呼叫前應先去重。Authorization 標頭攜帶 Apify API 權杖,必須妥善保密。電子郵件地址會傳送至 Apify 的託管服務進行檢查。驗證過程不會實際寄出郵件。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Email Verifier (SMTP, MX, Catch-All),將其新增到工作區。
  2. 連接 所需的 憑證。它們會被私密儲存,絕不會在公開頁面上展示。
  3. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。

交給代理程式安裝

把這段提示詞貼上到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等代理程式,或 SourceWeft 對話中。代理程式會讀取該伺服器的安裝指南,先向你展示發布者、端點和登入方式,經你同意後再把它新增到你的客戶端。金鑰不會寫進任何命令。

閱讀 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/io.github.sumitrmardy%2Femail-verifier/install.md,並按其中說明把這個 MCP 伺服器接入我的客戶端。修改任何設定之前,先告訴我它的發布者、端點和登入方式,等我確認。不要把 API 金鑰寫進命令或我會提交的檔案;問我金鑰應從哪裡取得。

檢視代理程式所依據的安裝指南

其他 MCP 客戶端

把它新增到你客戶端的 mcpServers 設定中。 客戶端會在首次連接時完成 OAuth 登入。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "email-verifier-smtp-mx-catch-all": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=sumitr_mardy/email-verifier"
    }
  }
}

README

English | 简体中文

Bulk Email Verification API — for n8n, AI Agents & MCP

Verify email addresses in bulk: RFC 5322 syntax → DNS/MX → disposable, role and free-provider lists → a live SMTP handshake with a mandatory catch-all probe. No email is ever sent — the check opens an SMTP session, reads the reply codes and hangs up.

[n8n templates] [MCP ready] [OpenAPI] [Pricing] [License]

➜ Try it on Apify

json
{  "email": "[email protected]",  "status": "deliverable",  "sub_status": "valid_mailbox",  "score": 100,  "checks": {    "syntax": true, "domain_exists": true, "mx_found": true,    "smtp_connectable": true, "mailbox_exists": true, "catch_all": false,    "disposable": false, "role_based": false, "free_provider": false,    "a_record_fallback": false, "has_tag": false  },  "mx_record": "aspmx.l.google.com"}

Why pipelines like it

Most verifiers are written for a human reading a dashboard. This one assumes the caller is code.

That changes what the output has to guarantee:

1. status is always one of four values. deliverable, undeliverable, risky, unknown. Never null, never empty, never a fifth value. Enumerate them once and stay correct.

2. All eleven checks keys are present on every record. A check that never ran is false, and the reason lives in sub_status. Nothing disappears.

3. Catch-all domains and Gmail-type providers are reported honestly. They come back risky with a reason, not a fabricated "valid".

Those three together mean you write this:

js
const mailable = results.filter(r => r.status === 'deliverable');const neverSend = results.filter(r => r.status === 'undeliverable' || r.checks.disposable);const retryLater = results.filter(r => r.status === 'unknown');

and not this:

js
const mailable = results.filter(r => r?.status === 'valid' && (r.checks?.catch_all ?? false) === false);

The second line is what every nullable-by-default API forces on you. It matters more for an agent than for a person: an agent cannot write ?? false — it acts on what it reads. A field that sometimes vanishes is not an inconvenience, it is a wrong answer delivered with confidence.


What to do with each result

statussub_statusWhat to do
deliverablevalid_mailboxSend
riskyrole_basedSend only if a shared inbox is acceptable
riskycatch_allMailbox unconfirmable — send at low volume, or enrich another way
riskyfree_provider_unverifiableTreat as a consumer address; mailbox unknowable over SMTP
riskyfull_mailboxHold, retry in a few days
riskydisposableDo not send; block at signup
unknowngreylistedRetry in 30–60 min — not a bad address
unknownsmtp_timeoutRetry later; if it persists, treat as unverified
unknowninternal_errorRetry once
undeliverableanyRemove from the list

Full table with scores and reasoning: docs/statuses.md

The distinction that matters: undeliverable means we found out it is dead; unknown means we could not find out. Tools that merge the two report better-looking numbers and quietly delete real customers from your list.


Use it in n8n

Every template calls the Actor with the core HTTP Request node — no community node to install, works on n8n Cloud and self-hosted. Authentication is an n8n Header Auth credential named Apify API; no token is stored in any file here.

TemplateWhat it doesImport
Verify a Google Sheets lead listReads rows with no verdict, verifies in batches, writes status/score back. Safe to re-run and to schedule.t1-google-sheets.json
Block disposable emails at signupWebhook in, {allow|review|block} out, with the policy in one editable Code node.t2-signup-check.json
Clean a CSV before cold emailUpload an Apollo/Instantly/HubSpot export, get back send_safe / review / drop as three CSVs. Greylisted rows are retried once.t3-clean-csv.json
AI agent toolAn AI Agent with the verifier as its only tool, and a system prompt that teaches it the action table above.t4-ai-agent-tool.json

Chinese versions of all four, with localized sticky notes: workflows/zh-CN/

To import: download the JSON, then in n8n use Workflows → Import from File. Setup steps are on a sticky note inside each workflow.


Use it from an AI agent

MCP — the Apify MCP server, scoped to this one Actor. Config for Claude Desktop and Cursor: agents/mcp/

OpenAPI — one file that Dify, Coze, GPT Actions and LangChain's OpenAPI toolkit can all import: openapi/email-verifier.openapi.yaml

Tool definitions — ready-made JSON for OpenAI function calling and the Anthropic tool API: agents/tool-definitions/

For the agent itself — llms.txt is the whole contract in one pass: endpoint, input, output, the action table, batching limits.

Chinese-first setup guides: Dify · Coze / 扣子


Use it from code

bash
curl -X POST "https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/sumitr_mardy~email-verifier/run-sync-get-dataset-items" \  -H "Authorization: Bearer $APIFY_TOKEN" \  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \  -d '{"emails":["[email protected]","[email protected]"]}'

Python and Node examples, each under 25 lines and with no SDK required: examples/


Large lists

Addresses go in one batch per call, never one call per address — batching is what makes this cheap and fast.

A synchronous Apify run must finish inside 300 seconds. Past that, use the async pattern: start the run, wait for it, then fetch the dataset. Working example: examples/batch-large-list/

Measured throughput and the batch size to use: docs/pricing-and-batching.md


Pricing

Pay per event: one charge per address that gets a verdict — including undeliverable and unknown, because the work was done either way, and a confirmed bad address is exactly the result you were paying for. No per-run charge.

The rate is tiered by your Apify plan and is adjusted to track the market, so it is not reprinted here where it would go stale: see current pricing.

You need an Apify account to call the API; there is a free tier.


Known limits

Stated plainly, because you would find them anyway.

  • Free providers cannot be mailbox-verified. Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo and iCloud answer 250 for addresses that do not exist, then bounce at delivery. Any vendor claiming a per-mailbox Gmail verdict from SMTP is guessing. You get risky/free_provider_unverifiable and checks.mailbox_exists: false.
  • Catch-all domains cannot be mailbox-verified. By definition. The probe detects them and says so rather than returning a confident guess.
  • Greylisting is not a verdict. 421/450 come back as unknown/greylisted, which is retryable. Template T3 does the retry for you.

FAQ

Does it send an email? No. It opens an SMTP session, sends EHLO, MAIL FROM and RCPT TO, reads the reply codes and disconnects. It never issues DATA, so no message body exists anywhere in the process.

Can it verify Gmail addresses? It verifies that the syntax and domain are valid and that the address is not disposable. It cannot confirm that a specific Gmail mailbox exists — Google answers identically for real and fake addresses. Nothing that uses SMTP can do better; tools that claim otherwise are guessing.

What is a catch-all domain? A domain configured to accept mail for every address, existing or not. Before asking about your address, the verifier sends a RCPT TO for a random local part that cannot exist. If that is accepted, the domain is catch-all and every address on it is reported risky/catch_all.

How many emails per call? As many as finish inside the 300-second sync limit. Measure with your own list; see docs/pricing-and-batching.md. Beyond that, use the async pattern.

How do I use it with an Apollo / Instantly / Lemlist export? Template T3 — upload the CSV, get three cleaned lists back. It picks the email column automatically and deduplicates first, so you are not charged twice for the same address.

What happens to duplicates? They are charged. Deduplicate before you call; every template here already does.


MIT licensed. Issues and pull requests welcome — particularly corrections to the n8n templates from anyone running a version where something behaves differently.

來源:README.md,提交 3ba856d

工具

0
該伺服器需要登入,因此 SourceWeft 無法在沒有帳號的情況下讀取其工具,也未收錄。已連接帳號所能看到的內容可能因帳號及其權限而異。

版本歷史

1
  1. v1.0.0最新Oct 21, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 85%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通必需25 分
  • 已宣告認證方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分