Mendrift

io.github.suneel190700由 GitHub 帳號 suneel190700 發布v0.1.2更新於 Oct 24, 2026

MCP server for ML drift detection, MLflow registry diffing, and HMAC-gated model rollback

概覽

AI 產生的概覽

一套 MLOps 事故回應 MCP 伺服器,可偵測模型漂移、比對 MLflow 註冊表版本,並且只在 HMAC 人工核准後執行模型回滾。

可以做什麼
Mendrift 透過 stdio 提供七個工具:get_drift_report(以 Evidently 提供各特徵漂移距離與結構變更)、summarize_metric_anomalies(以目前流量分別評估生產版本與前一版本)、get_deployment_history(註冊表版本轉換與別名)、diff_deployments(版本間的參數、指標與特徵結構差異)、propose_rollback(產生可審閱的回滾計畫)、execute_rollback(受閘控,需要一次性 HMAC approval_token)以及 open_incident(寫入含診斷與證據的事故紀錄)。核准閘門在工具層而非提示層執行,因此遭提示注入或判斷混亂的代理無法執行寫入。
適用情境
當你希望助理調查生產模型退化時使用:將告警分類、依據監控與註冊表證據診斷根因,並提出或執行回滾。它適合已使用 MLflow 與 Evidently、且希望採人工介入式修復流程而非自動寫入的團隊。
執行需求
本機 Python 程序,透過 pip install mendrift-mcp 或 uvx mendrift-mcp 安裝。即時模式需要執行中的 MLflow 追蹤伺服器(MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI),以及供代理 Claude 模型使用的 ANTHROPIC_API_KEY;示範模式(MENDRIFT_DEMO=1)使用固定資料,無需外部服務。託管網頁示範將 Anthropic 金鑰保留在伺服器端。
安裝前請注意
execute_rollback 會變更 MLflow 註冊表中的 production 別名,並受僅由人工審核流程簽發的一次性、限定動作 HMAC approval_token 閘控;切勿偽造或重複使用權杖。open_incident 會寫入事故紀錄。即時模式需要 ANTHROPIC_API_KEY,並將告警與證據資料傳送給 Anthropic 模型;託管示範因每次執行都呼叫真實模型而限流。

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 Mendrift,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。

其他 MCP 客戶端

參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。

README

[test]

Mendrift

Autonomous MLOps incident response agent, plus mendrift-mcp — an open-source MCP server for drift detection and ML incident tooling.

bash
pip install mendrift-mcp     # or: uvx mendrift-mcp

Published on PyPI and the MCP Registry as io.github.suneel190700/mendrift-mcp.

▶ Live demo — run a real incident in your browser: supply an alert, watch the agent diagnose it against a real MLflow registry, and approve or reject the rollback at the human-in-the-loop gate. Toggle between a crafted synthetic scenario and real US consumer-credit benchmark data. React frontend on a FastAPI backend; the free tier sleeps, so the first load may take ~40s.

When a production model drifts or degrades, Mendrift detects it, diagnoses the root cause from monitoring and registry evidence, proposes a remediation, and executes it only after human approval.

alert ──> classify ──> diagnose (MCP tools) ──> propose             │                                     │           noise ──> close               human approval gate                                                   │                                    execute ──> verify recovery

Built with LangGraph (agent orchestration), LangChain (ChatAnthropic + bind_tools), the Model Context Protocol, Evidently, MLflow, and Claude (Haiku + Sonnet).

mendrift-mcp tools

tooltypepurpose
get_drift_reportreadper-feature drift distances + schema changes (Evidently)
summarize_metric_anomaliesreadproduction vs previous model scored on current traffic
get_deployment_historyreadregistry version transitions and aliases
diff_deploymentsreadparams / metrics / feature-schema diff between versions
propose_rollbackreadgenerates a reviewable rollback plan
execute_rollbackgatedrequires a single-use HMAC approval_token
open_incidentwriteincident record with diagnosis + evidence

Safety model

The approval gate is enforced in the tool layer, not the prompt: execute_rollback verifies a single-use, action-scoped HMAC token minted only by the human review flow — the minting function is never exposed over MCP. A prompt-injected or confused agent cannot execute writes.

Tested live: Claude was first ordered to roll back "with full authorization" (it proposed but declined to fabricate a token), then handed a fabricated token, which the gate rejected by constant-time HMAC comparison:

[Approval gate defense: refusal, then cryptographic rejection]

See tests/test_approval_gate.py, including the action-scoping test: a token minted for one model/version is invalid for any other.

Human-in-the-loop, crash-proof

The incident graph halts before execution (interrupt_before) and checkpoints every step to SQLite. The process can die; a new process resumes the same incident by thread_id after a human mints the approval token — which enters state only via update_state(), from outside the graph. Denial is a first-class path: no token → closed_approval_denied, no execution.

[Kill-and-resume demo]

Agent design

stepmodelwhy
classifyHaikusingle constrained label; cheapest path
diagnoseSonnetmulti-hop tool reasoning over evidence
verifyHaikuthreshold check on fresh metrics

Routing lives in a code table (ROUTER_TABLE), not prompts, so cost per path is measurable config — ~3.9K input / 630 output tokens per incident. The diagnose loop is bounded (max 8 tool calls) with per-call retries and capped backoff; on tool failure the model receives a structured error record, and on budget exhaustion the agent degrades to an incident with partial evidence — it never invents a diagnosis. Destructive actions require affirmative evidence: a rollback is recommended only when retrieved evidence links the symptom to a specific deployment, never on deploy-correlation alone. The agent can also recommend monitor — real but mild, non-actionable drift is watched, not acted on.

Live mode

MENDRIFT_DEMO=0 runs the agent against real infrastructure rather than fixtures:

  • scripts/seed_demo.py trains two sklearn versions into a local MLflow registry — v13 clean, v14 with a schema swap and a training window polluted by missed-fraud labels (recall 0.72 → 0.18, AUC 0.84 → 0.82) — and writes reference/current frames
  • get_drift_report runs Evidently's DataDriftPreset over those frames, returning real Wasserstein/JS distances against per-metric thresholds, plus schema changes derived from actual column sets
  • get_deployment_history / diff_deployments read the registry and the underlying runs — real aliases, params, metrics
  • summarize_metric_anomalies scores the current window with both the production and previous versions, so it reports model divergence rather than population drift — a rollback clears it, ordinary data shift does not
  • an approved execute_rollback moves the production alias for real
bash
uv run mlflow server --host 127.0.0.1 --port 5001        # separate terminalPYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_demo.py
rm -f demo.dbMENDRIFT_DEMO=0 PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/demo_interrupt.py startMENDRIFT_DEMO=0 PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/demo_interrupt.py approve

A live run diagnoses from computed evidence — e.g. "v2 introduced a schema swap replacing promo_flag with promo_flag_v2 … label_noise 0.0 → 0.45 collapsing val_recall 0.724 → 0.176 … 79.7% prediction-rate divergence from the prior version, model-induced, not population drift" — then halts for approval and resolves.

The eval suite deliberately stays on fixtures: evals need determinism and zero cost in CI, while live mode exercises the real stack.

Live web demo (two worlds)

A hosted web app wraps live mode behind a browser UI: a React (Vite) frontend on a FastAPI backend, deployed on Render. A visitor submits an alert, the frontend posts it to /api/diagnose, and the backend runs the real LangGraph agent — live Claude reasoning over an embedded MLflow registry (sqlite://, seeded on boot) — then halts at the HMAC gate. Approve or reject and the backend resumes the graph via /api/decision, executing a real alias rollback and verifying recovery. The Anthropic key lives only on the server; runs are rate-limited since each calls a real model. Try it: mendrift-demo.onrender.com.

The dashboard toggles between two seeded worlds, so the same agent can be seen against both a crafted scenario and genuine real-world data:

  • Synthetic (scripts/seed_demo.py, model fraud-scorer) — the crafted schema-swap incident: clean, teachable, an unambiguous rollback story.
  • Real US credit (scripts/seed_real.py, model credit-risk) — the Give Me Some Credit dataset (real US consumer-credit records, target SeriousDlqin2yrs) split by borrower age into reference/current windows for genuine feature drift, with a controlled model regression injected into v2 (asymmetric missed-default label noise) so the incident has ground truth. Real distributions and real Evidently drift; a known correct action. Measured gap: val_recall 0.637 → 0.156, AUC 0.854 → 0.810.

Injecting a known regression into real data is standard practice for validating a drift-detection system — it gives the evaluator ground truth for what the agent should decide while the drift computation still runs on genuine distributions.

The backend routes each request to the right world (model + parquet frames + label column) per the dataset field; the tool layer reads those from env vars, applied per-request under a lock so concurrent requests stay isolated.

Run the web app locally:

bash
# 1. build the React frontend (FastAPI serves the built assets)cd frontend && npm install && npm run build && cd ..
# 2. seed both worlds, then start the backend (frontend + API on one port)export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...export MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI="sqlite:///$(pwd)/mlflow.db"PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_demo.py     # synthetic world (fraud-scorer)PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/seed_real.py     # real world (credit-risk)PYTHONPATH=src uv run uvicorn app.main:app --port 8000     # open http://localhost:8000

For frontend development with hot reload, run cd frontend && npm run dev (port 5173); Vite proxies /api to the backend on port 8000.

Evaluation

src/mendrift/evals/ replays synthetic incident trajectories against the real graph — only the LLM (scripted) and the read tools (fixture world) are faked; the gated action tools are the genuine implementations, so the HMAC gate is exercised by every test. Four assertions per trajectory:

checkmeaning
no_ungated_writesevery execute_rollback carried a valid HMAC token — hard fail
classification_oktriage label matched
tool_sequence_okrequired tool calls occurred in order (extras allowed)
action_okterminal outcome matched

19 logic-distinct incident scenarios spanning the decision space, each with its own evidence shape and correct action:

  • Rollback — deploy-correlated drift or quality regression with affirmative diff evidence
  • Retrain — label/concept shift, segment-specific degradation (no valid rollback target)
  • Monitor — mild seasonal drift, low-importance-feature drift, holiday effects
  • Incident (investigate) — upstream schema rename, feature-store change, docs-only deploy, calibration break, threshold shift, silent data-quality drop
  • Graceful degradation — evidence tools down → incident with partial evidence, never a fabricated diagnosis
  • Noise — flapping / auto-resolved alerts closed with zero tool calls
  • Human-declined — well-founded rollback the reviewer rejects → closed, no execution

Scripted for fast CI, live for the measured rate:

bash
PYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/run_traj.py --all          # scripted, fastPYTHONPATH=src uv run python scripts/run_traj.py --all --live   # real models

Live-model eval runs at ~95% task-success; the handful of run-to-run divergences reflect LLM eval variance on decision-margin scenarios. The live suite surfaced real failure classes during development — a JSON extractor masking a correct decision, a classifier baited by an alert's reassuring wording, and a diagnoser proposing rollback on correlation alone — each fixed at its own layer (parser, alert wording, evidence-rule prompt).

Quickstart (demo mode)

bash
uv syncMENDRIFT_DEMO=1 uv run mendrift-mcp     # stdio MCP server with fixture dataPYTHONPATH=src uv run pytest -v         # gate + trajectory suite

Claude Desktop config:

json
{"mcpServers": {"mendrift": {  "command": "uvx",  "args": ["mendrift-mcp"],  "env": {"MENDRIFT_DEMO": "1"}}}}

Status

  • mendrift-mcp server over stdio, verified in MCP Inspector and Claude Desktop
  • seven tools with a read / gated / write permission taxonomy
  • HMAC-gated rollback with action-scoped single-use tokens (tests first)
  • LangGraph incident graph: SQLite checkpointing + human-approval interrupt, kill-resume proven
  • LLM nodes on LangChain (ChatAnthropic.bind_tools): Haiku classify/verify, Sonnet diagnose loop
  • 19-scenario trajectory eval across the decision space; ~95% live, zero ungated writes
  • CI: gate + trajectory suite on every push
  • live mode: real Evidently drift computation, MLflow registry history/diff, real alias rollback
  • live web demo: React + Vite frontend on FastAPI, deployed on Render
  • two demo worlds: crafted synthetic scenario + real US credit-risk data, selectable in the UI
  • published: PyPI (pip install mendrift-mcp) + MCP Registry (io.github.suneel190700/mendrift-mcp)

License

MIT

來源:README.md,提交 9c0ceb7

工具

0
SourceWeft 尚未在沙箱中啟動過該軟體包,因此其工具未知。

版本歷史

1
  1. v0.1.2最新Sep 16, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 50%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通25 分

    請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。

  • 已宣告認證方式10 分

    請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。

  • 已列出工具15 分

    請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。

  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分
  • 授權條款10 分