
Every App Is Open Source
io.github.thomasisalwayslate由 GitHub 帳號 thomasisalwayslate 發布v0.2.0更新於 Oct 25, 2026
Native reverse engineering with Ghidra and evidence on Apple Silicon macOS. Setup required.
發布方自己的服務:Source
概覽
一個本機 MCP 伺服器,讓 AI 助理透過 Ghidra 逆向分析編譯後的程式,回傳反編譯程式碼、記憶體讀取結果與可驗證的證據。
- 可以做什麼
- 開啟並描述程式:架構、記憶體配置與分析狀態,並提供有界線的靜態呼叫追蹤、供助理自行計算的安全算術與位元組解碼,以及在 Apple 平台上還原 Swift 字串。在二進位檔中搜尋文字及其使用位置,或依名稱尋找函式。檢查函式:反編譯程式碼、原始指令、呼叫端與被呼叫端,並附來源資訊讀取靜態記憶體或 Go 字串表。調閱任何回覆背後儲存的完整證據並進行雜湊驗證。對應用程式目錄,可清點選定的根目錄與 ASAR 成員、在原始套件外選定一個原生元件,並檢查擷取的 JavaScript 原始碼。
- 適用情境
- 適合在 Apple Silicon Mac 上讓助理檢查編譯後的二進位檔或應用程式套件並說明其運作方式,結果會標示為事實、計算或推測,並可追溯至儲存的證據。不適合一般檔案讀取、shell 操作或非 Apple 平台。
- 執行需求
- 需要 Apple Silicon Mac、uv 與 Apple 命令列工具;目前不支援 Windows、Linux 與 Intel Mac。安裝步驟會下載校驗碼固定的 Java 與 Ghidra(約 770 MB),並建置 Ghidra 的 Apple Silicon 反編譯器。以本機 stdio 程序執行,透過 uvx 啟動並指向程式路徑或應用程式根目錄;選用環境變數 EAOS_RUNTIME_DIR 可指定自訂 Java/Ghidra 目錄。未宣告身分驗證。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Every App Is Open Source,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
[PyPI] [CI] [Python 3.13] [macOS Apple Silicon] [License: Apache-2.0] [Every App Is Open Source MCP server – quality and maintenance score on Glama]
Every App Is Open Source
Give your AI agent a compiled program, and it works out how it's built. Ghidra does the decompiling. This is the agent's side of it: a small set of MCP tools, short answers by default, and evidence you can trace back to the binary.
The name is a provocation, not a license. Seeing how an app works doesn't give you the right to copy it. Read the disclaimer.
What it looks like
An agent connected only to EAOS was given a small compiled program and asked what quote(6) returns. These are its actual tool calls:
Its answer: 45. Below 4 the function returns 19, otherwise 7*n + 3, citing the address and the evidence ID.
This is one recorded session on version 0.1.1 with an already-analyzed cache, not a benchmark. The full transcript has every call and its limits.
How it compares
I've compared it with REA and GhidraMCP on three modified programs, with the same model and questions for each tool. The results depend on the target, and EAOS doesn't win every time:
Costs are API-equivalent model costs; timings exclude initial analysis. Each row is three runs per tool, so these are descriptive results, not a general ranking. In round 2 the other tools' missed cases were mostly header order and incomplete error text, not wrong behavior. The modified programs and answer keys are private so the tests can't be spoiled. That means you can read every run summary, scoring review and protocol, but you can't replay these exact comparisons yourself. Every number, loss and limitation is in BENCHMARKS.md.
Get your first result
These instructions target 0.2.0. Before publication, use the reviewed local wheel path in place of the package requirement.
You need an Apple Silicon Mac, uv and Apple's Command Line Tools (xcode-select --install). Windows, Linux and Intel Macs aren't supported yet.
1. Install. This downloads checksum-pinned Java and Ghidra (about 770 MB) and builds Ghidra's Apple Silicon decompiler, which the official download doesn't include:
Everything goes into ~/Library/Application Support/Every App Is Open Source/. It doesn't touch your shell profile, your system Java or your agent's settings. Versions, sizes, troubleshooting and uninstall are in SETUP.md.
2. Build a tiny test program and analyze it:
You should see classification: computed, an ARM64 language, a SHA-256 and an evidence ID.
3. Connect your agent. For Claude Code:
Codex and other MCP clients are in CLIENTS.md.
4. Ask:
Find the quote function. What does quote(6) return? Explain both branches and cite the function address and saved evidence.
The correct answer is 45. This checks that your setup works; it doesn't prove the agent will understand any app. Addresses depend on the compiler, so yours will differ from the example above.
For a standalone program, use the same eaos mcp /absolute/path/to/program command. For an application directory, select its root with an explicit external workspace:
Ask the agent to inventory the root, select one native component by its returned ID, then inspect that component. Full native analysis remains the default; quick mode is opt-in. Individual executable paths inside bundles are still refused; copy the executable out for standalone analysis. For big standalone programs, terminal pre-analysis can finish before you connect your agent.
The tools
I started with seven tools based on the calls agents made across 24 earlier test runs. Native-file sessions now expose eight, including bounded static call traversal. Application-directory sessions expose eleven, adding inventory, explicit component selection and bounded JavaScript inspection.
Application-directory sessions also expose:
0.2.0 extends the initial JavaScript/ASAR inspection from 0.1.9, which was limited to 1 MiB of source.
The 0.2.0 source profiles accept coherent JavaScript captures up to 8 MiB, with explicit bounded syntax-index continuation and fixed result pages. Focus one observed preload API, inspect one selected module or its surrounding loader skeleton, then compose selected saved evidence into a compact source relationship pack. Every candidate retains its component, source, table and evidence identity; unknown bindings remain explicit. Python parser dependencies come with the package; no JavaScript or application is executed.
On official Electron Fiddle 0.39.0, the recorded development check inspected its large bundles and produced 60 selected source nodes, six conditional module-lookup candidates and three preserved narrow preload relationships. It established no complete main-process IPC edge: dynamic factory replacement, loader/interop identity, inherited dispatch and process context remain unresolved. These are local static checks, not a comparative benchmark or a test of reliable agent answers. A separate bounded Ghostty trace still did not establish the complete Swift/C/Zig reload chain. Full Electron support, reconstructed applications and REA parity are not established.
Native traversal also retains available names for unprepared quick-mode candidates. That does not prepare their instruction bodies or establish missing relationships. Full native analysis remains the default.
The exact inputs, outputs and limits of each one are in the tool contract.
Every tool result says what it is
Each tool result is labelled:
- fact: read straight from the captured binary or source
- computed: worked out from it, like decompiled code or a decoded string
- guess: an inference that hasn't been verified
Decompiled code is computed, not the original source. Successful analysis results include saved evidence you can pull up with read_evidence. Status responses and errors don't include evidence IDs; a tool failure makes no analysis claim.
These labels describe the tool results, not your agent's final answer. An agent can still misread correctly labelled evidence. The labels and evidence IDs let you check a conclusion; they don't certify it.
Analyze once, reuse it
Ghidra's analysis is slow, so each standalone program gets its own eaos-analysis/<sha256>/ folder right next to it, with the analyzed project and evidence. Reopening a compatible current-version profile reuses it; different engine, architecture or analysis profiles can require fresh analysis. Application-directory captures and native caches go into the explicit external workspace. Projects made before 0.1.7 are kept but not reused: 0.1.7 analyzes the program again in its new cache format.
Each session works on a read-only copy of the exact bytes it hashed, so changing the original file doesn't affect a session that's already open. If a cached project doesn't match the program's hash, it stops instead of guessing, and it never deletes old evidence.
One Ghidra quirk: it won't create projects inside a folder whose name starts with a dot, like .cache. Keep the program you're analyzing out of those.
Analysis options
Full analysis is the default. The CLI and MCP server accept --analysis-mode quick for partial metadata and requested-function preparation, and --architecture arm64 for an explicit Mach-O slice. Quick function search offers explicit bounded index continuation, separately from view-bound result pagination. Quick mode is limited to 64-bit ARM/x86 Mach-O; it does not recover every Swift name or prove missing references are absent. No new speed or accuracy comparison has been run.
On Apple Silicon, compatible universal inputs select ARM64 automatically. Each captured whole-file hash retains separate architecture/profile/engine caches under profiles/, with shared immutable evidence. Legacy projects are preserved; the new cache format does not reuse them. Status remains available during native operations, with configurable deadlines and cancellation. See setup and the tool contract before using these options.
How the benchmarks are run
The summary is above; the details live in BENCHMARKS.md, one row per target, each linked to its run summaries and scoring.
The rules stay the same every time:
- Same model, fresh sessions, three runs per tool.
- Questions and answer key frozen before the first run. Where a model might know the answers by heart, I secretly change them and rebuild the program first.
- Same head start. Every tool begins with the program already analyzed, outside the timer.
- REA runs the way people actually install it, with its bundled skill and its full tool catalog.
- Everything is kept, including rounds I lost.
The private targets and answer keys mean you can't replay my exact comparisons. You can run the same method on your own target with the benchmark guide.
What's next
Right now it analyzes native programs on Apple Silicon Macs, with selected-root inventory and initial partial JavaScript/ASAR inspection. I'd like it to inspect more kinds of software, but there's no fixed order or schedule: new support follows a demonstrated need and reproducible tests, and each one gets its own benchmark before I claim anything.
Security
The tools expose the selected program, or the explicitly selected application root and component, plus their generated evidence. There's no general file-reading or shell tool. The Python and Java processes aren't sandboxed by the OS, though: they run with your user's permissions, and text recovered from a binary is untrusted. Read the security model before you analyze anything you don't trust.
Found a vulnerability? Report it privately, not in a public issue.
Development
What gets tested where:
The green CI badge covers the first two rows only. To run the native checks after eaos setup or ./install.sh:
To work from a checkout instead of PyPI, ./install.sh sets up everything locally, then ./eaos mcp /absolute/path/to/program starts the server.
Contributing
This is my project, and I build it myself. Bug reports and ideas are very welcome through issues. I don't accept outside code. If you want to take it somewhere else, fork it; that's what the license is for. More in CONTRIBUTING.md.
License and credits
Apache-2.0. If you build on it, keep the NOTICE file. What's changed in each release is in the changelog.
Ghidra and PyGhidra do the heavy lifting; they're the work of their own contributors. The comparison baseline is LaurieWired's GhidraMCP. The programs I benchmark on, and their licenses, are credited in BENCHMARKS.md.
Made by thomasisalwayslate. I make apps, games and small tools, usually something I want to use myself. More on my site, including the write-ups behind the benchmarks.
If this saved you some digging, a ⭐ helps other people find it.
來源:README.md,提交 445e4b5
工具
0版本歷史
6- v0.2.0最新Oct 25, 2026
- v0.1.9Oct 23, 2026
- v0.1.8Oct 23, 2026
- v0.1.6Oct 20, 2026
- v0.1.5Oct 20, 2026
- v0.1.3Oct 19, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分
其他 Source 整合
Source
app.source官方發布者
Source 提供的遠端 MCP 端點,讓助理存取已連接 Source 的網站的行銷歸因與分析資料。

ArxSource
由 GitHub 帳號 nicolaiprodromov 發布
本機 MCP 伺服器,讓助理檢索 arXiv 論文、依章節或 LaTeX 原文閱讀、追蹤引用,並找出論文對應的程式碼。
SourceMed
io.sourcemed
SourceMed 為助理提供經來源核實的臨床證據庫:可提出證據問題、瀏覽書架並閱讀附引用的卡片。

Spree Commerce: open-source B2B and marketplace ecommerce
由 GitHub 帳號 spree 發布
Spree 的 MCP 伺服器讓 AI 助理以自然語言管理 Spree 商店的商品目錄、回答報表問題並完成商店設定。

PlushSource
由 GitHub 帳號 quickman924 發布
本機 MCP 伺服器,內建訂製絨毛玩具製造商名錄,讓助理搜尋、篩選、比較並引用廠商條目。