
Biopharma Catalyst Mcp
io.github.yesc97由 GitHub 帳號 yesc97 發布v1.2.0更新於 Oct 24, 2026
Forensic biopharma catalyst auditor — 10 tools, deterministic CLEAN/BEAR_SIGNAL verdict.
概覽
透過抓取試驗、文獻、SEC、FDA 與市場資料審核生技醫藥催化劑題材,並給出確定性結論。
- 可以做什麼
- 以免費公開資料來源執行法證式生技醫藥研究流程:ClinicalTrials.gov、PubMed、SEC EDGAR 與 XBRL、openFDA 以及 Yahoo Finance。主要工具 audit_catalyst 接受股票代號、藥物與贊助商,回傳 CLEAN、FLAG、BEAR_SIGNAL、BLACK_FLAG 或 DISQUALIFIED 等結論及底層計算資料。另有九個連接器工具分別提供原始資料,包括試驗狀態標記、申報文件、現金跑道、內部人交易、放空比例、試驗方案快照、選擇權鏈與 FDA 送件歷史。
- 適用情境
- 適合在不想手動翻查試驗註冊資料庫、申報文件與 FDA 紀錄的情況下,檢驗某個生技醫藥催化劑論點是否站得住腳。適用於針對特定藥物或贊助商組合的研究,而非大範圍篩選;也適合希望由程式碼給出結論、由模型負責敘述的使用者。
- 執行需求
- 以 Node.js 本機程序執行,可從 npm 套件安裝或從原始碼建置。需要將 SEC_USER_AGENT 環境變數設為真實聯絡方式,否則 SEC EDGAR 會限流或封鎖請求。需要連線至上述公開資料來源;未聲明需要 API 金鑰或帳號。
安裝
在 SourceWeft 中
- 開啟 儀表板中的 Biopharma Catalyst Mcp,將其新增到工作區。
- 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。
Desktop only,透過 STDIO。 STDIO 服務會啟動本機處理程序,因此需要 SourceWeft 桌面主機。
其他 MCP 客戶端
參照 儲存庫 中的啟動說明。
README
biopharma-catalyst-mcp
A forensic biopharma research MCP server — pulls catalyst-grade signals from 6 free, authoritative sources (ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, SEC EDGAR, SEC XBRL companyfacts, openFDA, Yahoo Finance) and hands them to your LLM. Includes a server-side aggregator that runs the full forensic workflow in one tool call and returns a deterministic verdict.
Built for the workflow most retail biopharma analysts actually run: a ticker hits the radar, you spend 2–4 hours grinding Google Scholar, FDA pages, EDGAR, and the options chain to decide if the catalyst story holds up. This compresses that to ~30 seconds.
Table of Contents
- The headline tool: audit_catalyst
- The Tactical Auditor system prompt (alternative)
- Tools
- Install
- Configure as an MCP server
- CLI mode
- Why search by drug name, not ticker
- Live analysis examples
- Roadmap
- Technical reference & maintenance
- Contributing
- Contact
- Notes
- License
The headline tool: audit_catalyst
Single tool, single call, single verdict. Works on any sponsor / drug combination — no hardcoded tickers anywhere.
Big Pharma example — the "Clean" case
A CLEAN verdict is the highest praise this tool gives. It means the auditor cross-referenced 9 sources, tried to break the bull thesis, and couldn't (or could only surface secondary concerns that don't outweigh an S-tier bull signal). That's a stronger long signal than a generic "BUY" rating, because failing to break a thesis is harder than confirming it.
The verdict scale:
CLEAN— tried to break the thesis, couldn't. Confidence drops if A-tier concerns surface.FLAG— A-tier bear signal fired without an offsetting S-tier bull. Data ambiguous; look harder.BEAR_SIGNAL— at least one S-tier bear fired (terminated trial, FDA rejection, dilution risk, etc.). Confidence rises with multiple S-tier bears.BLACK_FLAG— Going Concern disclosed by auditors + cash runway under 6 months. Equity at high risk of zero.DISQUALIFIED— insufficient data tied to the company. Try a different drug or query the underlying connectors directly.
The math (cash runway, months to catalyst, insider sentiment, ATM IV, catalyst date) is also returned for the user to inspect. The LLM narrates; the verdict is code.
The Tactical Auditor system prompt (alternative)
If you'd rather have the LLM run the workflow itself across the individual tools, drop this prompt into your MCP client as a custom instruction or system prompt:
Then ask: audit ticker SRPT, drug elevidys (or whatever).
A CLEAN verdict is the highest praise this tool gives — it means the auditor tried to find a hole in the thesis and couldn't. That's a stronger long signal than a generic bull stamp.
Tools
Ten tools — nine raw connectors plus the aggregator:
All sources are free, no API keys required.
Install
Configure as an MCP server
Add to your MCP client config (e.g. ~/.config/claude/claude_desktop_config.json):
SEC_USER_AGENT is required by SEC EDGAR — use a real contact email or you'll be rate-limited.
CLI mode
For headless runs without an MCP client:
The CLI prints a structured human-readable snapshot — same data the MCP tools expose.
Why search by drug name, not ticker
Biopharma research signal lives at the pipeline drug level, not the corporate level. Searching CT.gov for "Pfizer" returns hundreds of unrelated trials across every therapeutic area. Searching for Comirnaty returns the specific vaccine trials that drive regulatory outcomes. Always feed the tools the drug name (brand or generic), and use the ticker only for market data + SEC filings.
Live analysis examples
Institutional-grade biopharma research requires analyzing the world's largest pipelines. A few examples from live runs:
audit_catalyst("LLY", "Mounjaro", "Eli Lilly")
audit_catalyst("PFE", "Comirnaty", "Pfizer")
audit_catalyst("MRK", "Keytruda", "Merck")
10b5-1 plans don't exempt insider selling from the bear column — management chose to schedule those sales. Real money out the door is real money out the door.
Roadmap
- CT.gov protocol diff — currently we detect late-stage amendments via the proximity heuristic (last update vs primary completion date). The CT.gov v2 API does not expose what changed in an amendment. To detect specific endpoint changes (the canonical goalpost move), we'd need to scrape the public version-history web UI or wait for an API update.
- FDA AdComm forward calendar — currently we surface FDA submission history. A forward calendar of advisory committee meetings would let users plan around binary regulatory events.
- Polygon / Tradier connector — Yahoo's options data is incomplete on illiquid small-cap biotech. A paid market-data option for power users.
- Sponsor-class weighting — currently the aggregator filters trials to those sponsored by the queried company. Industry-academic partnerships and NIH-sponsored trials are excluded. Could weight rather than filter.
- 10-K MD&A scan — extract the "Risk Factors" section and look for management-disclosed risks beyond the Going Concern check.
Technical reference & maintenance
Verifying locally
After any change, rebuild and run the MCP stdio smoke test:
For the aggregator specifically:
Both should complete in under 30 seconds against live APIs. If they don't, check whether SEC has rate-limited you (see Per-source caveats below).
Adding a new connector
- Create
src/connectors/<name>.ts. Export a single async function that returns a structured shape (no LLM-dependent fields, just data). - If it hits
sec.govordata.sec.gov, wrap each axios call inthrottleSec(() => axios.get(...)). - Wire it in
src/index.ts: import, add to thetools/listschema, add the dispatch case in the request handler. - Optionally wire into
audit_catalyst— add to thePromise.allSettledblock and write the signal logic against the spec. - Add a smoke test invocation to your local
verify-mcp.mjs.
Per-source caveats
- SEC.gov: 10 req/sec hard cap. Throttled to ~5 req/sec via
sec-throttle.ts. Going over triggers a 10-minute IP block. TheSEC_USER_AGENTenv var must be a real contact email — fake placeholders are rate-limited harder. - CT.gov v2: No protocol-diff endpoint. The goalpost detector uses a proximity heuristic (firstPost vs primaryCompletion vs lastUpdate). True diff requires scraping the public version-history UI; queued for v1.2.
- Yahoo Finance: Schema validation is suppressed because Yahoo drifts on illiquid biotech option chains. Calls return what they can; expect occasional empty option chains.
- openFDA:
drugsfda.jsoncovers NDA/BLA submission history but not always forward PDUFA dates. Use CT.govcompletionDateas the leading catalyst indicator. - Form 4 XML: EDGAR's
primaryDocumentfield points to the HTML wrapper, not the structured XML. The connector lists each filing's folder viaindex.jsonand finds the.xmlentry. Capped at 25 most recent filings per audit to bound cost.
Security
SEC_USER_AGENTmust stay in local environment variables and never be committed to version control. It contains a real contact email and gets logged on the SEC side; treating it as a secret keeps it out of public git history and avoids inadvertent doxxing..envand.env.localare gitignored by default in this repo; keep your contact details there.- If you fork this project, set your own
SEC_USER_AGENT— do not reuse another user's. - Agent context files (
GEMINI.md,CLAUDE.md,.gemini/,.claude/) are also gitignored; never commit those, they may contain operating notes / strategy details meant for local use only.
Versioning
- Patch (
x.x.+1): bug fixes, doc tweaks, no schema changes. - Minor (
x.+1.0): new tools, new connectors, additive signal logic, schema additions to existing tools. - Major (
+1.0.0): breaking schema changes (renamed fields, removed tools), new required env vars, MCP protocol upgrades.
Shipping a release
- Bump
versioninpackage.jsonto match the change scope. - Update README "headline tool" or "Forensic case studies" sections if behavior changed.
- Run
npm run build && node verify-mcp.mjs— must be 9/9 passing. - Commit using conventional-commit style (
feat:,fix:,chore:). - Tag the commit:
git tag v<X.Y.Z>. - Push to your remote when ready; optional
npm publishif you maintain a public npm release.
Contact
Attila Kovacs (yesc97)
- Email: [email protected]
- GitHub: yesc97
Notes
- Not investment advice. This is research automation. The synthesis step — and the trade — is on you.
License
ISC
來源:README.md,提交 3f27653
工具
0版本歷史
1- v1.2.0最新Sep 16, 2026
評分
已滿足適用檢查項的 50%
該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。
- 近 30 天內可連通25 分
請保持端點能夠回應 MCP 握手;SourceWeft 每 30 天探測一次。
- 已宣告認證方式10 分
請在註冊中心條目中宣告憑證請求標頭,或保持端點能夠回應探測,以便判定其認證方式。
- 已列出工具15 分
請讓伺服器在無憑證時回應 tools/list,或發布可在沙箱中無憑證啟動的軟體包。
- 描述必需15 分
- 圖示10 分
- 文件15 分
- 授權條款10 分