CGIS Code Graph

🧠 CGIS: Code Graph Intelligence System

A code graph your AI agent can query instead of guess

[Continuous Integration] [Graph Integrity] [PyPI]

Ask "what breaks if I change this?" and get the call chain, not a guess.

CGIS parses a repository with tree-sitter into a graph of fully qualified symbols and the calls, imports and containment between them, stores it in SQLite, and serves it to AI agents over MCP. An agent that would otherwise grep and read whole files asks the graph instead.

• Languages: Python · TypeScript / TSX · Go (structure and metrics only; its impact answers are a lead to confirm by reading — exp4, measured on one library, golang/crypto, mostly its ssh package; not measured on applications) · JSON and YAML (data key declarations only, when data keys are enabled with --data-keys: no symbols, calls or impact)
• Runs: locally — no account, no telemetry; the graph never leaves your disk (the one opt-in exception)

$ cgis ingest src --output graph.db$ cgis impact cgis.query.engine.QueryEngine.get_flow_graph --db graph.db --depth 2🔍 Analyzing transitive upstream callers of: cgis.query.engine.QueryEngine.get_flow_graph
METHOD cgis.query.engine.QueryEngine.get_flow_graph (cgis/query/engine.py:215)├── FUNCTION cgis.query.context.context_service._collect_callees (cgis/query/context/context_service.py:44)│   └── FUNCTION cgis.query.context.context_service.build_context (cgis/query/context/context_service.py:96)└── METHOD cgis.guardian.collector.ContextCollector._graph_sections (cgis/guardian/collector.py:174)    ├── METHOD cgis.guardian.collector.ContextCollector.collect_graph_context (cgis/guardian/collector.py:213)    └── METHOD cgis.guardian.collector.ContextCollector.collect_for_chunk (cgis/guardian/collector.py:303)

Real output — CGIS run on its own source.

🚀 Quickstart

In Claude Code (fastest)

/plugin marketplace add zaebee/codegraph-brain/plugin install cgis@codegraph-brain

That ships the MCP server, a skill that teaches the agent when to query the graph instead of reading files, and /cgis:ingest to build the graph on first use. The server is pulled from PyPI on demand via uvx, so there is nothing to clone or build.

Any other MCP client (Cursor, Claude Desktop, …)

{  "mcpServers": {    "cgis": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["--from", "codegraph-brain", "cgis-mcp"] }  }}

From the terminal

# No install needed — uvx fetches it from PyPIuvx --from codegraph-brain cgis ingest ./my-project --output graph.db
uvx --from codegraph-brain cgis impact "my_module.core_function" --db graph.db --depth 5   # who calls thisuvx --from codegraph-brain cgis trace  "my_module.MyClass.run"   --db graph.db --depth 3   # what this calls# add --format mermaid (or json) to either for a diagram or machine-readable output

Or install it for good: pip install codegraph-brain (Python 3.12+), then use cgis directly. The full command list is in CLI_USAGE.md.

📈 Proof at Real Scale

CGIS runs on a working twelve-repository estate — four languages, 8,146 commits, shipping daily. On its FastAPI backend it classifies 82.7% of 87,845 edges definitively and prints the remaining 17.3% rather than inventing targets for them — including the part that is CGIS's own gap.

That share rose from 11.4% in #459, which stopped counting calls to missing symbols as resolved. About 4 points of what is left is a known resolver gap, not something undiscoverable: ingesting app/ strips the app. prefix its imports carry, and the import path does not yet reconcile the two — the same backend ingested at its package root reports 13.2%. The number is what the tool admits it cannot place today, and it is allowed to move the unflattering way.

Read the case study → — every figure measured and reproducible, including what CGIS doesn't cover.

🤔 Why a graph, and how this differs

Text retrieval hands an agent chunks that look related. It cannot say which of three functions named save a call reaches, or what sits five callers up. CGIS resolves every call site to a fully qualified name when the source allows it — and when it does not, the edge stays marked unresolved and is counted, never filled with a plausible guess.

🤖 MCP Tools

The main tools:

All 16 tools, with parameters: MCP_REFERENCE.md.

🏗️ How It Works

1. Extract — tree-sitter parsers turn each file into nodes and raw call edges.
2. Resolve — the ResolverEngine maps raw calls to fully qualified names, or leaves them explicitly unresolved.
3. Store — SQLite holds the graph; queries are breadth-first traversals over it.

graph LR    A[Source Code] --> B[Extractors]    B --> C[Resolver Engine]    C --> D[(SQLite Graph DB)]    D --> E[MCP Server]    D --> F[Prompt Compiler]    E --> G[AI Agents]    F --> G

The details — and a pipeline graph CGIS regenerates from its own source on every change — are in HOW_IT_WORKS.md, and the full map of every document with its generated cross-references to the code is in docs/INDEX.md.

🛡️ Guardian: Graph-Aware Code Review

Guardian is CGIS's built-in LLM reviewer — it reviews pull requests using the graph as context, not just the diff text. It runs in CI and posts inline comments anchored to the exact line.

• Two-stage, recall-first: a finder surfaces every plausible defect (optimised for recall), then a separate skeptic pass filters false positives — closer to how human reviewers work, and far more reliable than a single precision-gated prompt.
• Local or cloud, no lock-in: point it at Ollama (qwen2.5-coder, llama3.1, granite-code, …) for free local inference, or at Mistral / Gemini / Claude / OpenCode Go (DeepSeek) in the cloud. You can even mix them — a strong cloud finder with a free local cross-model skeptic.
• Graph-aware context: the reviewer sees impact graphs, architectural drift, and project ontology — so it catches structural and convention defects a flat-diff reviewer can't.
• Deterministic anchoring: every inline comment is positioned by a verbatim quote from the diff, not the model's (often wrong) line guess.
• Dogfooded & measured: Guardian reviews CGIS's own pull requests, and a benchmark harness scores it against curated ground truth — so prompt changes are validated, not guessed.

# Build the graph, then review a PR with a local model (no API key).# --inline posts over HTTPS with GH_TOKEN (or GITHUB_TOKEN); no gh CLI needed.# The reusable workflow exports GH_TOKEN for you.cgis ingest ./src --output graph.dbGUARDIAN_PROVIDER=ollama GUARDIAN_MODEL=qwen2.5-coder:14b \  uv run python scripts/guardian_review.py --pr 123 --db graph.db --inline
# Or OpenCode Go / DeepSeek: deepseek-v4.1-flash unless GUARDIAN_MODEL names another.# GUARDIAN_OPENCODE_EFFORT is low unless set (the catalog lists low|high|max; other values# pass through to the gateway). GUARDIAN_OPENCODE_BASE_URL pins a different gateway.# No ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is needed for this provider.GUARDIAN_PROVIDER=opencode-go GUARDIAN_MODEL=deepseek-v4.1-flash OPENCODE_API_KEY=... \  uv run python scripts/guardian_review.py --pr 123 --db graph.db --inline
# Or a Claude skeptic over a Mistral finder: Claude Haiku 5.5 unless GUARDIAN_SKEPTIC_MODEL names# another, at GUARDIAN_ANTHROPIC_EFFORT=low unless set (low|medium|high|xhigh|max). Claude models# reject a sampling temperature, so GUARDIAN_TEMPERATURE must be unset.GUARDIAN_SKEPTIC=anthropic ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... MISTRAL_API_KEY=... \  uv run python scripts/guardian_review.py --pr 123 --db graph.db --inline

In GitHub Actions, opencode-go needs no static key: the reusable workflow exchanges a short-lived GitHub OIDC token for inference access immediately before the review. Enable OIDC for GitHub Actions in the Opencode console, set the calling repository's OPENCODE_CLIENT_ID variable, and grant the review job id-token: write. OPENCODE_API_KEY is then minted at run time and never stored as a secret. Sign-in happens when GUARDIAN_PROVIDER is opencode-go, opencode, or unset (unset means the minted key makes opencode the auto-detected provider); an explicit other provider skips it.

No GPU on hand? Benchmark it on a notebook GPU → — free end to end, since the fixtures score without an LLM judge. Or point Guardian at a remote Ollama → — over an frp stcp tunnel, no public port, and a guard that refuses a review of a silently truncated prompt.

🔒 Privacy

CGIS collects nothing: no telemetry, no analytics, no account. Your code and the graph built from it stay on your machine. The one exception is opt-in: Guardian, if you run it with a cloud model, sends the reviewed diff to the provider you chose. See PRIVACY.md.

🛠️ Development

Requires Python 3.12+ and uv.

git clone https://github.com/zaebee/codegraph-brain && cd codegraph-brainuv syncmake pytest

See CONTRIBUTING.md for the standards: strict MyPy, linting, ontology compliance.

💼 Architecture Audit

CGIS is free and you can run it yourself. If you would rather have the analysis than the tool, I run a fixed-price audit of your codebase's structure — authorisation coverage, blast radius, coupling, architectural drift — delivered in five working days, $2,400 fixed, with an explicit list of what the analysis cannot see. Read what's included →