DC5 WHOIS

tech.dc5.whois由 whois.dc5.tech 發布官方發布者v2026.10.30更新於 Oct 30, 2026

WHOIS, RDAP, DNS, IP / ASN / CIDR and Web3 name (ENS, Unstoppable, Handshake) lookups. No API key.

已驗證Streamable HTTP可網頁執行網頁搜尋與抓取安全與監控

概覽

DC5 WHOIS 的託管 MCP 服務(whois.dc5.tech),由 whois.dc5.tech 發布;無需登入;Streamable HTTP;8 個工具。

暫無 AI 概覽:以下資訊來自註冊中心條目和服務本身。

發布者
whois.dc5.tech
端點
whois.dc5.tech
最近檢查

安裝

在 SourceWeft 中

  1. 開啟 儀表板中的 DC5 WHOIS,將其新增到工作區。
  2. 為需要使用其工具的對話啟用該服務。

Web executable,透過 Streamable HTTP。 遠端服務在工作區中設定後即可從網頁執行環境執行。

交給代理程式安裝

把這段提示詞貼上到 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 等代理程式,或 SourceWeft 對話中。代理程式會讀取該伺服器的安裝指南,先向你展示發布者、端點和登入方式,經你同意後再把它新增到你的客戶端。金鑰不會寫進任何命令。

閱讀 https://sourceweft.com/mcp/tech.dc5.whois%2Fdc5-whois/install.md,並按其中說明把這個 MCP 伺服器接入我的客戶端。修改任何設定之前,先告訴我它的發布者、端點和登入方式,等我確認。不要把 API 金鑰寫進命令或我會提交的檔案;問我金鑰應從哪裡取得。

檢視代理程式所依據的安裝指南

其他 MCP 客戶端

把它新增到你客戶端的 mcpServers 設定中。

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dc5-whois": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://whois.dc5.tech/mcp"
    }
  }
}

工具

8

check_aspa_path

Verify an AS path with ASPA

Check an AS_PATH against the published ASPA objects (RPKI attestations of which providers a network authorises), following the verification procedure of draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification. The result is valid, invalid or unknown, with the reason and the first hop that broke the path. Use it to find out whether a path shows a route leak or an unauthorised provider. "Unknown" only means some network on the path published no ASPA; it is not a fault. Behavior: offline, answered from the local RPKI snapshot. The procedure is an Internet-Draft, not an RFC, and the neighbor-AS and AS_SET prerequisite checks of a real router are left out. Only the path is read; it is neither stored nor logged.

輸入參數path必填direction

check_lookalike

Look-alike (homograph) check

Check whether one domain or Web3 name is a visual look-alike (homograph): letters from different scripts mixed in one label, or every non-ASCII letter having a Latin twin, so раураl.com reads as paypal.com. Returns the scripts used and the Latin name it imitates. Use it to screen candidate or incoming names quickly (phishing triage, brand monitoring). lookup_target already includes this warning for the name it looks up, so there is no need to call both for one name. Behavior: offline and instant; no DNS, registry or network call. It catches script tricks only, not typos or digit swaps such as paypa1.com, so a clean result does not mean the domain is safe.

輸入參數name必填

check_mail_security

Mail security grade

Grade one domain's email authentication and list every check: SPF (single record, the 10 DNS-lookup limit across includes, the all qualifier), DMARC (policy, inheritance from the organizational domain, pct, report addresses), MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, BIMI, DANE and null MX. The level is strong, fair, weak, no_mail (domain declares it sends no mail) or none (no MX, SPF or DMARC at all). Use it for questions about spoofing, deliverability or a DMARC rollout. lookup_target gives only the overall grade; this tool gives the status and a one-line finding for each check. Behavior: reads public DNS only and never connects to the domain's mail servers, so it cannot test SMTP TLS, certificates or whether a mailbox exists. Usually under 2 s.

輸入參數domain必填

check_route

Check a prefix against an origin AS

Check one (prefix, origin AS) pair against the public records: RPKI route origin validation (RFC 6811), the routing registries (IRR route objects) and how many RIPE RIS peers see that origin for the prefix. Use it to answer whether an AS is authorised to originate a prefix, why a route may be dropped by networks that filter on RPKI, or whether a registry object matches an announcement. For everything about one prefix or AS use lookup_target instead. Behavior: offline, answered from local snapshots; the result lists only the datasets this instance has loaded. RPKI "invalid" can be a stale ROA and an IRR object is a claim, so neither is proof of a hijack or of authorisation. A prefix RIS does not see may still be announced to peers it does not have.

輸入參數origin必填prefix必填

get_tld_info

Top-level domain facts

Facts about one top-level domain from local datasets: whether it is delegated in the root zone, its type (country-code or infrastructure when derivable), the registry's RDAP server, root-zone name servers, whether the root zone publishes a DS record (DNSSEC) and which DS algorithms, and any Web3 namespace that claims the same label (for example .eth, .crypto, .bnb, or a collision such as .xyz). Use it to answer where to send an RDAP query for a TLD, whether a TLD is signed, or whether a name under it could mean something else on a blockchain. For one domain use lookup_target instead. Behavior: offline and instant, answered from synced IANA and root-zone data; makes no network call. A field without data is omitted, never guessed. Registry operator and delegation date are not included.

輸入參數tld必填

list_data_sources

Data sources and freshness

List the local datasets and feeds behind lookup_target (RIR delegations, IANA, Public Suffix List, cloud / CDN ranges, Tor and Private Relay, reputation lists, GeoLite2) with state, record count, generation date and a stale flag. Use it to judge how current a reputation, RIR, cloud or geolocation answer is, or to explain why such a section is missing from a lookup (dataset not loaded or stale). Registry, DNS and Web3 data are fetched live and are not listed here. Behavior: takes no arguments and makes no external calls.

無需輸入參數。

lookup_many

Look up several targets at once

Look up up to 10 domains, IPs, CIDRs, ASNs or Web3 names in one call and get one short line per target (type, registrar and expiry, nameservers, network owner, origin AS, cloud, reputation, Web3 status) plus the same facts as structured fields and a details_url for each. Use it to triage a list, for example the domains in a phishing report or the IPs in a log excerpt. For the full fact sheet of one target use lookup_target. Behavior: each target is a live lookup like lookup_target and counts against the same rate limit, so a long list can hit it; targets that were refused say so and can be retried later. Up to 3 run at once, the whole call is cut off after about 22 s and targets that did not finish say so. One failing target does not fail the others.

輸入參數queries必填

lookup_target

WHOIS / RDAP / DNS / network / Web3 lookup

Look up one domain, IP address, CIDR block, ASN (AS15169), EVM address (0x…) or Web3 name (ENS .eth, Unstoppable, SPACE ID .bnb, Handshake hns:) and get a compact fact sheet. Domains: registrar, dates, status, nameservers, DNS records, overall mail-security grade, third-party services seen in DNS, possibly dangling records. IPs, CIDRs and ASNs: network owner, origin AS, RIR, cloud / CDN provider, Tor or iCloud Private Relay tag, geolocation, abuse contact, local reputation. Web3 names: registration status, addresses, records, ENS expiry. A 0x EVM address: its ENS primary name on Ethereum, Base, Optimism, Arbitrum, Linea and Scroll (reverse lookup). A look-alike warning is added when the name uses deceptive letters. Use it first for any question about who owns, runs, hosts or registered something. Prefer check_mail_security when you need each email check rather than the grade, and check_lookalike to screen many names without network calls. Behavior: queries registries, DNS and (for Web3) blockchain RPC live, usually in 1-5 s, at most about 12 s. If one source fails, the rest is still returned and the failure is listed under errors. Reputation covers local blocklists only: no match is not a clean bill of health. Queries are not logged or stored. The result ends with details_url, the full page with every record and its provenance.

輸入參數query必填namespace

版本歷史

4
  1. v2026.10.30最新Oct 30, 2026
  2. v2026.10.24Oct 25, 2026
  3. v2026.10.23Oct 23, 2026
  4. v2026.10.18-cdf49ebOct 19, 2026

評分

已滿足適用檢查項的 83%

該評分衡量此收錄條目的完整程度,依據註冊中心條目、端點與公開來源計算得出。它不是對伺服器本身的評價,也不表示伺服器安全或目前可用:可連通性是帶日期的檢查結果,評分也不包含安裝量或使用者評價。

  • 近 30 天內可連通必需25 分
  • 已宣告認證方式必需10 分
  • 已列出工具必需15 分
  • 描述必需15 分
  • 圖示10 分
  • 文件15 分

    請宣告包含 README 的 GitHub 儲存庫,或在 OAuth 受保護資源後設資料中提供 resource_documentation。

  • 授權條款不適用

    託管服務按其提供方的條款使用,因此這裡不要求授權條款。此檢查項不計入百分比。