
Taskbounty Check
io.github.eliottreichPublished by GitHub account eliottreichv0.1.6Updated Oct 24, 2026
Local GitHub Actions/CI maintenance check (action pinning, token perms). Not a full security audit.
The publisher's own server: check.tattoo: tattoo size and placement guide
Overview
A local stdio MCP server that lets an assistant scan GitHub Actions workflows for maintenance hygiene issues and explain or plan fixes.
- What you can do
- Scan a repository's GitHub Actions workflows and update-automation config, returning a local summary of hygiene findings such as unpinned actions, broad token permissions and missing permissions blocks, plus context-dependent patterns flagged for review. Explain a finding in plain language. Generate a text fix plan for the user to apply themselves. Reports are written locally as HTML and JSON.
- When to use it
- Useful when you maintain GitHub Actions workflows, especially in apps scaffolded by low-code builders, and want an assistant to review CI hygiene and suggest fixes inside the editor. It is a maintenance check, not a full security audit.
- Requirements
- Runs as a local process via npx, so Node.js and npm are needed. No accounts, API keys or environment variables are declared. The default scan needs no network access; the opt-in --gh-org mode uses the user's existing gh CLI session.
Installation
In SourceWeft
- Open Taskbounty Check in the dashboard and add it to a workspace.
- Enable the server for the chats that should use its tools.
Desktop only via STDIO. STDIO servers start a local process, so they need the SourceWeft desktop host.
Other MCP clients
Follow the launch instructions in the repository.
README
taskbounty-check
A local check for GitHub Actions and CI maintenance hygiene (third-party action pinning, workflow token permissions, and update automation), built for apps shipped with Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Cursor, or v0.
Local by default. No uploads. No telemetry. It reads only your workflow files, on your machine.
The default code path makes no outbound network requests, writes its report locally, and sends
nothing anywhere. There is no analytics or phone-home of any kind. Only the opt-in --gh-org mode
uses the network (through your own gh session).
Works with Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex (local MCP server, below).
Three ways to use it
1. GitHub Action — add a maintenance check to CI that writes a summary to the run (no PR comments, no source upload):
Want a human to interpret or fix what the Action surfaces? Request a free launch-safety review. TaskBounty gets no access to your repo, source, or workflows unless you submit that form.
2. Agent / MCP — a local stdio server for Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex:
3. One-off CLI — scan the current repo locally and write a report:
Pin a version (
@0.1.6) in committed config and CI for reproducibility.@latestis convenient for a quick one-off, but a pinned version is the reproducible choice.
The GitHub job summary
The Action writes a counts-only maintenance summary to the workflow run (categories and next steps, no filenames, line numbers, or repo source). Below is that exact summary, rendered from this repo's own CI output:
[TaskBounty check: GitHub Actions maintenance summary]
See it produced live by the self-check job in this repository's Actions runs.
Prefer a guided walkthrough? Follow the five-minute real-repository quickstart.
Learn more
- Methodology — exactly what it reviews and how findings are labeled.
- Privacy and scope — local-by-default data handling.
- Limitations — what it does NOT check (below).
Supported checks (and honest limitations)
Checks (GitHub Actions + CI maintenance hygiene):
- Third-party actions pinned to a movable tag/branch instead of a commit SHA
- Broad (write-all) workflow token permissions
- Missing explicit
permissions:block - Update automation (Dependabot/Renovate) presence
- Context-dependent workflow patterns flagged for private review (e.g.
pull_request_target, script injection)
Does NOT check (these need a manual review): exposed secrets, auth/authorization, payments, webhooks, runtime behavior. It is a maintenance/hygiene check, not a full security audit or a penetration test.
What it does
- Reads only your GitHub Actions workflow files and update-automation config, scans them in-process with a deterministic ruleset (the same rules as the public checker), and writes a local HTML + JSON report. It does not execute workflows, install dependencies, or run any repository code.
Modes
--gh-org uses your existing gh CLI session to fetch each repo's workflow files to this
machine (read-only). Your GitHub token is never read by this tool and never sent to TaskBounty.
What is read, written, transmitted
Run --explain-data to print this at any time.
- Reads (allowlist — nothing else is opened):
<repo>/.github/workflows/*.yml|*.yamland update-automation config (dependabot.yml/renovate.json*). Never source files,.env, secrets, SSH keys, credential stores, or anything outside the selected repository roots. Symlinks that escape a root are skipped, never followed. - Writes (local only):
<out>.json(full detail) and<out>.html. - Transmits: nothing by default.
--shareuploads nothing — it writes a sanitized, counts-only file (scan id, label, candidate counts by category, private-review count, scanner version, timestamps; repo names only with--include-repo-names) for you to submit manually. Network stays off under--share. Only--gh-orgintentionally uses the network.
Flags
--share · --gh-org <org> · --manifest <file> · --org-label <label> ·
--include-repo-names · --dry-run · --explain-data · --delete-local-report ·
--no-network (default everywhere except --gh-org) · --out <basename> · --version · --help
Want help interpreting or fixing these results?
Request a free 20-minute launch-safety review: https://www.task-bounty.com/ai-app-security-check/review?utm_source=npm&utm_medium=npm_readme&utm_campaign=workflow_security
TaskBounty receives nothing unless you submit that form. The scan runs locally and the full report stays on your machine; the review form gives us no access to your repositories, source, workflows, or secrets.
GitHub Code Scanning (SARIF)
Emit SARIF 2.1.0 and surface findings in your repo's Security → Code scanning tab:
The SARIF carries deterministic rule ids (taskbounty/<rule>), severity levels, and file/line
references — no source contents, secrets, or environment values, and no network access.
Confirmed findings are emitted as kind: fail; lower-confidence items as kind: review.
Help interpreting SARIF results: https://www.task-bounty.com/ai-app-security-check/review?utm_source=github&utm_medium=sarif_docs&utm_campaign=workflow_security
Upload it with the official action (full example in examples/code-scanning.yml):
Local agent (MCP)
Run a local stdio MCP server so Codex, Claude Code, or Cursor can scan and reason about findings
in your editor. It runs locally, makes zero outbound network requests, uploads no source, and
never modifies files — generate_fix_plan returns a plan as text for you to apply yourself.
Tools: scan_repo (local scan summary), explain_finding (plain-language explanation), generate_fix_plan (text fix plan).
Want a human to review the plan? https://www.task-bounty.com/ai-app-security-check/review?utm_source=mcp&utm_medium=mcp_docs&utm_campaign=workflow_security
Cursor — .cursor/mcp.json:
Claude Code:
Codex — in ~/.codex/config.toml:
Security
Zero runtime dependencies. Published to npm with provenance (verify on the package's npm page). The default run makes no outbound requests and uploads nothing; see the methodology for the full data-handling and scope boundaries.
Source: README.md at commit 4eb432e
Tools
0Version history
1- v0.1.6LatestSep 16, 2026
Score
50% of the applicable checks met
How complete this listing is, computed from the registry entry, the endpoint and public sources. Not a rating of the server and not a statement that it is safe or working today: reachability is a dated check, and no installs or reviews go into the score.
- Reached in the last 30 days25 pts
Keep the endpoint answering the MCP handshake; SourceWeft probes it every 30 days.
- Auth declared10 pts
Declare the credential headers in the registry entry, or keep the endpoint answering the probe so its auth can be classified.
- Tools listed15 pts
Answer tools/list without a credential, or ship a package that starts in a sandbox without one.
- DescriptionRequired15 pts
- Logo10 pts
- Documentation15 pts
- License10 pts
Other Check integrations
check.tattoo: tattoo size and placement guide
tattoo.checkOfficial publisher
check.tattoo: tattoo size and placement guide's hosted MCP server, published by check.tattoo; no sign-in required; Streamable HTTP; 5 tools.
iva.pt — EU VAT check (VIES) and Portuguese VAT law
pt.ivaOfficial publisher
Validates EU VAT numbers against VIES and returns Portuguese VAT Code (CIVA) and RITI articles, in Portuguese or English.

U.S. Public Company Check
Published by GitHub account JusticeUA
Remote Apify-hosted MCP server that lets an assistant look up U.S. public company checks by SEC CIK: filing status, bankruptcy 8-K flag, LEI and sanctions.

Taiwan Company Check
Published by GitHub account JusticeUA
Remote MCP server that lets an assistant look up Taiwanese companies by Unified Business Number for tax status, LEI and sanctions checks.

Romania Company Check
Published by GitHub account JusticeUA
Looks up Romanian companies by CUI, returning status, insolvency, LEI and sanctions data from official registers.