Hipaa Compliance

by affaan-mef648e01899bNo license275K starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated 3 days ago

HIPAA準拠実装、セキュリティ対策、監査ログ、およびデータ保護戦略。

AI-generated overview

Guides HIPAA compliance decisions for US healthcare software handling PHI, with guardrails and escalation paths.

What it does
This skill acts as a HIPAA-specific entrypoint for tasks involving US healthcare compliance. It provides decision gates about whether data is PHI, whether actors are covered entities or business associates, whether a BAA is needed, and whether access and auditability meet minimum necessary standards. It also lists guardrails for handling PHI in logs, analytics, prompts, URLs, and third-party tooling, and points to related implementation and review skills.
When to use it
Use it when a request explicitly mentions HIPAA, PHI, covered entities, business associates, or BAAs. It is also intended for building or reviewing US healthcare software that stores, processes, exports, or transmits PHI, and for assessing logging, analytics, LLM prompts, storage, or support workflows for HIPAA exposure.
Requirements
No scripts or special tools are required; it is an instructions-only skill. It references other skills such as healthcare-phi-compliance, healthcare-reviewer, and security-review, which are not included in this folder.

HIPAA Compliance

Use this as the HIPAA-specific entrypoint when a task is clearly about US healthcare compliance. This skill intentionally stays thin and canonical:

  • healthcare-phi-compliance remains the primary implementation skill for PHI/PII handling, data classification, audit logging, encryption, and leak prevention.
  • healthcare-reviewer remains the specialized reviewer when code, architecture, or product behavior needs a healthcare-aware second pass.
  • security-review still applies for general auth, input-handling, secrets, API, and deployment hardening.

When to Use

  • The request explicitly mentions HIPAA, PHI, covered entities, business associates, or BAAs
  • Building or reviewing US healthcare software that stores, processes, exports, or transmits PHI
  • Assessing whether logging, analytics, LLM prompts, storage, or support workflows create HIPAA exposure
  • Designing patient-facing or clinician-facing systems where minimum necessary access and auditability matter

How It Works

Treat HIPAA as an overlay on top of the broader healthcare privacy skill:

  1. Start with healthcare-phi-compliance for the concrete implementation rules.
  2. Apply HIPAA-specific decision gates:
    • Is this data PHI?
    • Is this actor a covered entity or business associate?
    • Does a vendor or model provider require a BAA before touching the data?
    • Is access limited to the minimum necessary scope?
    • Are read/write/export events auditable?
  3. Escalate to healthcare-reviewer if the task affects patient safety, clinical workflows, or regulated production architecture.

HIPAA-Specific Guardrails

  • Never place PHI in logs, analytics events, crash reports, prompts, or client-visible error strings.
  • Never expose PHI in URLs, browser storage, screenshots, or copied example payloads.
  • Require authenticated access, scoped authorization, and audit trails for PHI reads and writes.
  • Treat third-party SaaS, observability, support tooling, and LLM providers as blocked-by-default until BAA status and data boundaries are clear.
  • Follow minimum necessary access: the right user should only see the smallest PHI slice needed for the task.
  • Prefer opaque internal IDs over names, MRNs, phone numbers, addresses, or other identifiers.

Examples

Example 1: Product request framed as HIPAA

User request:

Add AI-generated visit summaries to our clinician dashboard. We serve US clinics and need to stay HIPAA compliant.

Response pattern:

  • Activate hipaa-compliance
  • Use healthcare-phi-compliance to review PHI movement, logging, storage, and prompt boundaries
  • Verify whether the summarization provider is covered by a BAA before any PHI is sent
  • Escalate to healthcare-reviewer if the summaries influence clinical decisions

Example 2: Vendor/tooling decision

User request:

Can we send support transcripts and patient messages into our analytics stack?

Response pattern:

  • Assume those messages may contain PHI
  • Block the design unless the analytics vendor is approved for HIPAA-bound workloads and the data path is minimized
  • Require redaction or a non-PHI event model when possible

Related Skills

  • healthcare-phi-compliance
  • healthcare-reviewer
  • healthcare-emr-patterns
  • healthcare-eval-harness
  • security-review

Source and attribution

Source:affaan-m/eccindocs/ja-JP/skills/hipaa-complianceat commitef648e0

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal