Diff Intake

by amplitude96fc7d4c58bbNo license42 starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated today

Reads a PR or branch diff and produces a structured YAML change brief for downstream analytics instrumentation skills. Use this as the first step whenever a user shares a PR link, branch comparison, or raw diff and wants to understand what changed, what needs tracking, or how to instrument a feature. Trigger on phrases like "review this PR", "what changed in this branch", "help me instrument this diff", "check analytics coverage for this change", or any request to start the analytics review workflow.

Instructions onlySoftware Development
AI-generated overview

Reads a PR or branch diff and emits a structured YAML change brief for analytics instrumentation.

What it does
This skill inspects a pull request or branch comparison, categorizes the changed files, and reads the core logic diffs. It derives user-facing changes and touched interaction surfaces, classifies the overall change type and analytics scope, and outputs a single machine-readable YAML change brief. It is positioned as the first step of an analytics instrumentation workflow, feeding downstream event-discovery and instrumentation skills.
When to use it
Use it when a user shares a PR link, branch comparison, or raw diff and wants to know what changed, what needs tracking, or how to instrument a feature. It fits requests such as reviewing a PR, checking analytics coverage for a change, or starting an analytics review workflow.
Requirements
Requires access to the repository and its history, plus the GitHub CLI (gh) for PR-based input or git for branch comparisons. Authentication to the hosting service may be needed for PR fetches. It ships no scripts; it is instructions only.

diff-intake

Follow this skill step by step. You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and precise — no prose around the YAML block.

Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize

Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.

Fetching changes

  • PR URL gh pr view <number-or-url> gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"'
  • Branch comparison git log <main|master>..<branch> git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch>
  • Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.

Categorize files

Assign each file to a category based on its path:

  • Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
  • Generated: anything with generated in its path
  • Testing: test files
  • Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
  • Documentation: READMEs, docs/
  • Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations

For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).

Step 2: Build the file summary map

Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map. Only process and include Core Logic files.

Fetching detailed diffs

  • PR gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOid Using the response, get a detailed diff git diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
  • Branch comparison git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>

For each file, record

  • summary — 2-line summary of what changed
  • stack — frontend, backend, or shared

Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces

While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level signals that downstream event discovery needs:

  • user_facing_changes — a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do, see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.
  • surfaces.components — the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.

For each surface, record:

  • name — component, route, page, hook, or surface name
  • file — repo-relative path
  • change — added, modified, or deleted

If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit surfaces.components rather than inventing one.

Step 3: Classify the overall change

Infer the change type and analytics scope:

TypeAnalytics implication
featHigh — new surfaces likely need tracking
fixLow–Medium — may affect existing event conditions
refactorLow — tracking paths may move, regression risk
perfLow — usually no tracking impact
revertMedium — need to check what tracking was lost
style / docs / test / build / ci / choreNone — skip analytics analysis

analytics_scope = highest implication present:

  • none — only no-impact types
  • low — only perf/refactor
  • medium — fix
  • high — any feature or capability addition

If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.

Step 4: Emit the YAML brief

Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly. List each file individually in file_summary_map (no globs).

yaml
change_brief:  classification:    primary: feat           # dominant conventional commit type    types: [feat, fix]      # all types detected    analytics_scope: high   # none | low | medium | high    stack: frontend         # frontend | backend | fullstack  summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"  user_facing_changes:    - "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."  surfaces:    components:      - name: "AvatarUpload"        file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"        change: modified  file_summary_map:         # each entry includes a layer field    - file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"      summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"      layer: frontend       # frontend | backend | shared    - file: "src/api/upload.ts"      summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"      layer: backend

Source and attribution

Source:amplitude/mcp-marketplaceinplugins/amplitude/skills/diff-intakeat commit96fc7d4

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal