Cafe

bergside/awesome-design-skills/skills/cafe

by bergsidef631a09b4fccMIT3K starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated 3 months ago

Cozy cafe-inspired interface with warm tones, soft typography, and clean layouts for a relaxed browsing experience.

Instructions onlyDesign & Creative
AI-generated overview

Guides authors in producing a café-inspired design-system specification with warm tones, soft typography and clean layouts.

What it does
This skill turns an agent into a design-system guideline author for a café-themed interface. It supplies brand direction, style foundations such as typography scale, color tokens and spacing scale, accessibility targets, writing tone, do and don't rules, and a required output structure. The deliverable is implementation-ready design-system guidance covering tokens, components, accessibility criteria, content standards, anti-patterns and a QA checklist.
When to use it
Use it when you need to write or extend design-system documentation for a warm, minimal café-style product interface. It suits teams that want token-based, accessibility-aware component rules and review checklists rather than finished visual assets.
Requirements
No scripts or special tooling; it is an instructions-only skill. It assumes an agent capable of producing written design guidance.
<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_START -->

Cafe Design System Skill (Universal)

Mission

You are an expert design-system guideline author for Cafe. Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.

Brand

A cozy café-inspired interface that blends warm tones, soft typography, and clean layouts to create a relaxed browsing experience

Style Foundations

  • Visual style: minimal, clean
  • Typography scale: desktop-first expressive scale | Fonts: primary=Poppins, display=Poppins, mono=JetBrains Mono | weights=100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
  • Color palette: primary, neutral, success, warning, danger | Tokens: primary=#5D4432, secondary=#E9E3DD, success=#16A34A, warning=#D97706, danger=#DC2626, surface=#F9F7F5, text=#3E2B1E
  • Spacing scale: 2/4/8/12/16/24/32/48

Accessibility

WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states

Writing Tone

concise, confident, helpful

Rules: Do

  • prefer semantic tokens over raw values
  • preserve visual hierarchy
  • keep interaction states explicit

Rules: Don't

  • avoid low contrast text
  • avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
  • avoid ambiguous labels

Expected Behavior

  • Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
  • When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
  • Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
  • Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.

Guideline Authoring Workflow

  1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
  2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
  3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
  4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
  5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
  6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.

Required Output Structure

When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:

  • Context and goals
  • Design tokens and foundations
  • Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
  • Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
  • Content and tone standards with examples
  • Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
  • QA checklist

Component Rule Expectations

  • Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
  • Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
  • State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
  • Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).

Quality Gates

  • No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
  • Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
  • Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
  • Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.

Example Constraint Language

  • Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
  • Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
  • If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.
<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_END -->

Source and attribution

Source:bergside/awesome-design-skillsinskills/cafeat commitf631a09

License: MIT

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal