Principle Sequence Verifiable Units

by cursorccb5507cec15No license10K starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated today

Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.

AI-generated overview

Guides agents to split multi-step work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, and to stack commits and PRs so the sequence proves itself.

What it does
This skill is an instruction-only principle for sequencing work. It tells the agent to break sweeps, migrations, or runs of similar edits into small units, each ending in a state that can be checked, and to verify each unit before starting the next. It also covers delivery: stacking commits and PRs in an order that reads as an argument, such as a failing test first and the fix on top. It produces no files or scripts; it shapes how the agent plans and orders its work.
When to use it
Use it for multi-step work such as sweeps, migrations, or repeated similar edits, and when deciding how to stack commits and pull requests. It fits situations where a break should be caught at the unit that caused it rather than after a batch.
Requirements
No tools, packages, runtimes, credentials, or network access are required. It ships no scripts; it is instructions only.

Sequence work into verifiable units

Order work as a sequence of small units, each ending in a state you can check, and don't advance until the current one is green.

Why: A break caught at the unit that caused it is cheap to localize. A break caught after a batch is buried, and you have already built further on a broken base. Sequencing those same units into a delivery a reviewer can replay turns "trust me" into "watch it go red, then green."

Execution. In a sweep, migration, or any run of similar edits, verify each change before starting the next. Each unit is a before/after bracket: known-good state, one change, run the check, then proceed. Rebase onto clean trunk first so every check measures against the real baseline. When a lever does the edits, the per-unit check is nearly free. Run it anyway.

Delivery. Stack commits and PRs in the order that proves the work. The canonical shape is the failing test first, then the fix on top. Other story orders are a subtraction before the reshape, a baseline capture before the treatment, the scaffold before the feature. Each commit lands on its own and the sequence reads as an argument.

The sequencing complement to the prove-it-works principle skill, which keeps each check real, and the build-the-lever principle skill, which makes the per-unit check cheap.

Source and attribution

Source:cursor/pluginsinpstack/skills/principle-sequence-verifiable-unitsat commitccb5507

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal