Chaos Engineer

by jeffallan1be15d8064f8MIT11K starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated 5 days ago

Designs chaos experiments, creates failure injection frameworks, and facilitates game day exercises for distributed systems — producing runbooks, experiment manifests, rollback procedures, and post-mortem templates. Use when designing chaos experiments, implementing failure injection frameworks, or conducting game day exercises. Invoke for chaos experiments, resilience testing, blast radius control, game days, antifragile systems, fault injection, Chaos Monkey, Litmus Chaos.

Instructions onlyDevOps & Cloud
AI-generated overview

Designs chaos experiments, failure injection frameworks and game day exercises for distributed systems, with runbooks and rollback procedures.

What it does
Guides a five-step workflow covering system analysis, experiment design, controlled execution, learning and automation. It produces experiment design documents, failure injection manifests and scripts, monitoring and alert configuration, rollback procedures, and learning summaries. Reference files cover experiment design, infrastructure chaos, Kubernetes chaos, tooling, and game days.
When to use it
Use when planning or running chaos experiments, building failure injection frameworks such as Chaos Monkey or Litmus, or facilitating game day exercises. Also suited to defining blast radius controls, safety mechanisms, and continuous chaos testing in CI/CD.
Requirements
No scripts ship with the skill; it is instructions and reference documents only. Running the described experiments requires access to the target systems and tooling such as kubectl, Litmus Chaos, toxiproxy, or Chaos Monkey.

Chaos Engineer

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing and executing chaos experiments
  • Implementing failure injection frameworks (Chaos Monkey, Litmus, etc.)
  • Planning and conducting game day exercises
  • Building blast radius controls and safety mechanisms
  • Setting up continuous chaos testing in CI/CD
  • Improving system resilience based on experiment findings

Core Workflow

  1. System Analysis - Map architecture, dependencies, critical paths, and failure modes
  2. Experiment Design - Define hypothesis, steady state, blast radius, and safety controls
  3. Execute Chaos - Run controlled experiments with monitoring and quick rollback
  4. Learn & Improve - Document findings, implement fixes, enhance monitoring
  5. Automate - Integrate chaos testing into CI/CD for continuous resilience

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Experimentsreferences/experiment-design.mdDesigning hypothesis, blast radius, rollback
Infrastructurereferences/infrastructure-chaos.mdServer, network, zone, region failures
Kubernetesreferences/kubernetes-chaos.mdPod, node, Litmus, chaos mesh experiments
Tools & Automationreferences/chaos-tools.mdChaos Monkey, Gremlin, Pumba, CI/CD integration
Game Daysreferences/game-days.mdPlanning, executing, learning from game days

Safety Checklist

Non-obvious constraints that must be enforced on every experiment:

  • Steady state first — define and verify baseline metrics before injecting any failure
  • Blast radius cap — start with the smallest possible impact scope; expand only after validation
  • Automated rollback ≤ 30 seconds — abort path must be scripted and tested before the experiment begins
  • Single variable — change only one failure condition at a time until behaviour is well understood
  • No production without safety nets — customer-facing environments require circuit breakers, feature flags, or canary isolation
  • Close the loop — every experiment must produce a written learning summary and at least one tracked improvement

Output Templates

When implementing chaos engineering, provide:

  1. Experiment design document (hypothesis, metrics, blast radius)
  2. Implementation code (failure injection scripts/manifests)
  3. Monitoring setup and alert configuration
  4. Rollback procedures and safety controls
  5. Learning summary and improvement recommendations

Concrete Example: Pod Failure Experiment (Litmus Chaos)

The following shows a complete experiment — from hypothesis to rollback — using Litmus Chaos on Kubernetes.

Step 1 — Define steady state and apply the experiment

bash
# Verify baseline: p99 latency < 200ms, error rate < 0.1%kubectl get deploy my-service -n productionkubectl top pods -n production -l app=my-service

Step 2 — Create and apply a Litmus ChaosEngine manifest

yaml
# chaos-pod-delete.yamlapiVersion: litmuschaos.io/v1alpha1kind: ChaosEnginemetadata:  name: my-service-pod-delete  namespace: productionspec:  appinfo:    appns: production    applabel: "app=my-service"    appkind: deployment  # Limit blast radius: only 1 replica at a time  engineState: active  chaosServiceAccount: litmus-admin  experiments:    - name: pod-delete      spec:        components:          env:            - name: TOTAL_CHAOS_DURATION              value: "60"          # seconds            - name: CHAOS_INTERVAL              value: "20"          # delete one pod every 20s            - name: FORCE              value: "false"            - name: PODS_AFFECTED_PERC              value: "33"          # max 33% of replicas affected
bash
# Apply the experimentkubectl apply -f chaos-pod-delete.yaml
# Watch experiment statuskubectl describe chaosengine my-service-pod-delete -n productionkubectl get chaosresult my-service-pod-delete-pod-delete -n production -w

Step 3 — Monitor during the experiment

bash
# Tail application logs for errorskubectl logs -l app=my-service -n production --since=2m -f
# Check ChaosResult verdict when completekubectl get chaosresult my-service-pod-delete-pod-delete \  -n production -o jsonpath='{.status.experimentStatus.verdict}'

Step 4 — Rollback / abort if steady state is violated

bash
# Immediately stop the experimentkubectl patch chaosengine my-service-pod-delete \  -n production --type merge -p '{"spec":{"engineState":"stop"}}'
# Confirm all pods are healthykubectl rollout status deployment/my-service -n production

Concrete Example: Network Latency with toxiproxy

bash
# Install toxiproxy CLIbrew install toxiproxy   # macOS; use the binary release on Linux
# Start toxiproxy server (runs alongside your service)toxiproxy-server &
# Create a proxy for your downstream dependencytoxiproxy-cli create -l 0.0.0.0:22222 -u downstream-db:5432 db-proxy
# Inject 300ms latency with 10% jitter — blast radius: this proxy onlytoxiproxy-cli toxic add db-proxy -t latency -a latency=300 -a jitter=30
# Run your load test / observe metrics here ...
# Remove the toxic to restore normal behaviourtoxiproxy-cli toxic remove db-proxy -n latency_downstream

Concrete Example: Chaos Monkey (Spinnaker / standalone)

bash
# chaos-monkey-config.yml — restrict to a single ASGdeployment:  enabled: true  regionIndependence: falsechaos:  enabled: true  meanTimeBetweenKillsInWorkDays: 2  minTimeBetweenKillsInWorkDays: 1  grouping: APP           # kill one instance per app, not per cluster  exceptions:    - account: production      region: us-east-1      detail: "*-canary"  # never kill canary instances
# Apply and trigger a manual kill for testingchaos-monkey --app my-service --account staging --dry-run false

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

Source and attribution

Source:jeffallan/claude-skillsinskills/chaos-engineerat commit1be15d8

License: MIT

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal