Re0 Work

LilMGenius/paperthin/skills/coil/re0-work

by LilMGenius7d5dc6235990230e45a24a25c527d81701da5458No licenseListed Oct 9, 2026Updated Oct 9, 2026

Restart a project or artifact from v0 while preserving only proven lessons, contracts, gates, vocabulary, real-surface tests, and negative corpus. Use when the foundation is wrong, accumulated code is misleading progress, or a new pass should learn from the old one without inheriting its accidental architecture.

Instructions onlyProductivity & Workflow
AI-generated overview

Guides a controlled project restart from v0, preserving only proven lessons, contracts, gates and tests.

What it does
This skill provides a workflow for restarting a project or artifact from v0 after a flawed foundation. It walks through reading prior plans, lessons, notes and QA evidence, then explicitly splitting what to preserve (contracts, schemas, quality gates, vocabulary, reusable services, real-surface tests, negative corpus) from what to discard (scaffold, explanatory UI, debug panels, shallow generated content, accidental abstractions). It produces a v0 skeleton plan with one complete vertical loop and a named first quality gate, plus verification checks before finishing.
When to use it
Use it when a project's foundation is wrong, accumulated code is misleading progress, or a new pass should learn from the old one without inheriting its accidental architecture. It fits situations where a restart is needed but earned knowledge must survive.
Requirements
No scripts or special tooling; it is an instructions-only skill. It relies on the agent having access to the current plan, lessons or re0-memo notes, local domain notes, QA evidence, and any triggering user complaint.

Start over from what the previous cycle proved, not from what it happened to build.

Goal

re0-work is a controlled restart. It keeps earned knowledge and refuses to copy forward accidental architecture. Starting from scratch is not amnesia: contracts, schemas, vocabulary, real-surface tests, quality gates, and negative corpus survive when they earned it. Scaffold, explanatory UI, debug panels, shallow generated content, and code whose only value was learning what not to do do not.

Workflow

  1. Read the current plan, any lessons or re0-memo notes, local domain notes, QA evidence, and any user complaint that triggered the restart.
  2. Identify what to preserve: contracts, schemas that survived QA, quality gates, vocabulary, reusable services, real-surface tests, and negative corpus.
  3. Identify what to discard: explanatory UI, debug panels, scaffold, shallow generated content, accidental abstractions, and code whose only value was learning what not to do.
  4. Name the first quality gate before planning code.
  5. Write a v0 skeleton plan with one complete vertical loop.
  6. Build only the first loop until it clears the gate.

Rules

  • Starting from scratch means no copy-forward unless the artifact earned it.
  • One complete vertical loop beats many shallow surfaces.
  • Preserve provenance in local docs, not in the shipped product.
  • Do not rebuild around a vague lesson. Turn it into a gate or leave it out.
  • Do not delete negative corpus; archive or reference it where the next cycle will see it.
  • If a reusable module survives, name the contract that proved it survives.

Verification

Before finishing:

  1. The preserve/discard split is explicit and evidence-backed.
  2. The new v0 plan has one complete vertical loop and a named first gate.
  3. No old architecture is copied forward merely because it exists.
  4. A fresh builder can start without rereading the failed codebase.

Source and attribution

Source:LilMGenius/paperthininskills/coil/re0-workat commit7d5dc62

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal