Code Debugging

by lingzhi2279e6c085d65e3No license386 starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated 7 months ago

Debug experiment code with structured error analysis. Categorize errors, apply targeted fixes with retry logic, and use reflection to prevent recurring issues. Use when experiment code fails or produces incorrect results.

Instructions onlySoftware Development
AI-generated overview

Debugs failing experiment code by categorizing errors, applying targeted fixes with retries, and reflecting on root causes.

What it does
Takes an error message, stderr output, or a code file and classifies the failure into categories such as syntax, import, runtime, timeout, output, or logic errors. It then analyzes the root cause, applies a fix strategy matched to the error severity, and retries up to a limited number of attempts. It finishes by explaining why the error occurred and noting patterns to avoid in future code.
When to use it
Use when experiment code fails to run or produces incorrect results, such as crashes, missing outputs, or unexpectedly poor accuracy. It is suited to structured debugging of research or experiment scripts rather than general application development.
Requirements
Instructions only; no scripts are shipped. It references a debug patterns document at a local skills path, so that reference file needs to be present for the full workflow.

Code Debugging

Systematically debug experiment code with structured error categorization and fix strategies.

Input

  • $0 — Error message, stderr output, or code file with issues
  • $1 — Optional: the code that produced the error

References

  • Debug patterns and state machine: ~/.claude/skills/code-debugging/references/debug-patterns.md

Workflow

Step 1: Categorize the Error

CategoryExamplesSeverity
SyntaxErrorInvalid syntax, indentationLow
ImportErrorMissing module, wrong nameLow
RuntimeErrorDivision by zero, shape mismatchMedium
TimeoutErrorInfinite loop, too slowMedium
OutputErrorMissing files, wrong formatMedium
LogicErrorWrong results, 0% accuracyHigh

Step 2: Analyze Root Cause

  1. Read the error traceback (last 1500 chars if truncated)
  2. Identify the exact line and variable causing the error
  3. Check for common patterns:
    • Device mismatch (CPU vs GPU tensors)
    • Shape mismatch in matrix operations
    • Missing data normalization
    • Off-by-one errors in indexing
    • Incorrect loss function for task type

Step 3: Apply Fix Strategy

For syntax/import errors: Direct fix, single attempt For runtime errors: Fix and rerun, up to 4 retries For logic errors: Reflect on approach, consider alternative methods For timeout: Reduce dataset size, optimize bottleneck, add early stopping

Step 4: Reflect and Prevent

After fixing:

  1. Explain why the error occurred
  2. Identify which lines caused it
  3. Describe the fix line-by-line
  4. Note patterns to avoid in future code

Fix Strategy State Machine

Stage 0 (first attempt) → repost code as freshStage 1 (second attempt) → repost or leave depending on severityStage 2 (third attempt) → regenerate from scratch if still failing

Rules

  • Prefer minimal targeted edits over full rewrites
  • Maximum 4-5 fix attempts before changing approach
  • Always truncate long error outputs to last 1500 characters
  • After fixing, verify the fix doesn't introduce new errors
  • Keep error history to avoid repeating the same mistakes
  • If 0% accuracy: check accuracy calculation first, then check data pipeline

Related Skills

  • Upstream: experiment-code
  • See also: paper-to-code, data-analysis

Source and attribution

Source:lingzhi227/agent-research-skillsinskills/code-debuggingat commit9e6c085

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal