
Using Superpowers
by obra5bf4e7801107No license290K starsListed Sep 23, 2026Updated Sep 23, 2026Repository updated yesterday
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
Only the file list is public. File contents are available once the skill is installed in a workspace.
| Path | Size | Type |
|---|---|---|
| references/antigravity-tools.md | 1.5 KB | text/markdown |
| references/claude-code-tools.md | 1.4 KB | text/markdown |
| references/codex-tools.md | 4.7 KB | text/markdown |
| references/gemini-tools.md | 4.5 KB | text/markdown |
| references/hermes-tools.md | 1.9 KB | text/markdown |
| references/muse-tools.md | 1.9 KB | text/markdown |
| references/pi-tools.md | 1.2 KB | text/markdown |
| SKILL.md | 3.1 KB | text/markdown |
Source and attribution
Source:obra/superpowersinskills/using-superpowersat commit5bf4e78
License: No license
Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.
More from obra/superpowers

Writing Plans
obra
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Verification Before Completion
obra
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

Using Git Worktrees
obra
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback

Test Driven Development
obra
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

Requesting Code Review
obra
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Receiving Code Review
obra
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation