React Composition 2026

patternsdev/skills/react/react-composition-2026

by patternsdev48bf58a488cdMIT253 starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated 5 months ago

Teaches modern React composition patterns for 2025/2026. Use when designing component APIs, building shared UI libraries, or refactoring prop-heavy components.

AI-generated overview

Reference guide on modern React composition patterns for designing, reviewing, and refactoring component APIs.

What it does
Provides ten documented React composition patterns, each with an avoid/prefer code comparison, covering boolean-prop replacement, compound components with context, explicit variants, children over render props, state decoupling, provider-lifted state, polymorphic as props, React 19 ref handling, slots, and headless components. It is an instruction-only reference: the agent applies these patterns when designing component APIs, generating code, or reviewing component architecture. It produces guidance and suggested refactors rather than files or runnable output.
When to use it
Use when a component has accumulated several boolean props, when building reusable UI components or a shared component library, or when refactoring rigid, hard-to-extend components. Also suited to reviewing component architecture for flexibility and maintainability.
Requirements
No scripts or assets; instructions only. The agent needs file-reading and search tools (Read, Grep, Glob) to inspect .tsx and .jsx sources. No packages, credentials, or network access are required.

Modern React Composition Patterns

Table of Contents

Composition patterns for building flexible, maintainable React components that scale. These patterns replace boolean-prop proliferation, rigid component APIs, and tangled state with composable, explicit designs.

When to Use

Reference these patterns when:

  • A component has more than 3-4 boolean props controlling its behavior
  • Building reusable UI components or a shared component library
  • Refactoring components that are difficult to extend
  • Designing component APIs that other teams will consume
  • Reviewing component architecture for flexibility and maintainability

Instructions

  • Apply these patterns during component design, code generation, and review. When you see boolean prop accumulation or rigid component APIs, suggest the appropriate composition pattern.

Details

Overview

The core principle: composition over configuration. Instead of adding boolean props and conditional branches to handle every variant, compose smaller, focused components together. This makes components easier to understand, test, and extend — for both humans and AI agents.


1. Replace Boolean Props with Composition

Impact: HIGH — Prevents combinatorial explosion and makes intent explicit.

Boolean props multiply complexity: 4 booleans = 16 possible states, most of which are untested. Replace them with composable children.

Avoid — boolean prop accumulation:

tsx
<Card  showHeader  showFooter  collapsible  bordered  withShadow  headerAction="close"  size="large"/>

Prefer — explicit composition:

tsx
<Card variant="bordered" shadow="md">  <Card.Header>    <h3>Title</h3>    <Card.CloseButton />  </Card.Header>  <Card.Body collapsible>    <p>Content here</p>  </Card.Body>  <Card.Footer>    <Button>Save</Button>  </Card.Footer></Card>

Each piece is explicit, testable, and independently optional.


2. Build Compound Components with Context

Impact: HIGH — Shared implicit state without prop drilling.

Compound components are a group of components that work together, sharing state through context rather than props. The parent owns the state; children consume it.

Avoid — parent manages everything through props:

tsx
<Select  options={options}  value={value}  onChange={onChange}  renderOption={(opt) => <span>{opt.icon} {opt.label}</span>}  renderSelected={(opt) => <b>{opt.label}</b>}  placeholder="Choose..."  clearable  searchable  maxHeight={300}/>

Prefer — compound components:

tsx
const SelectContext = createContext<SelectState | null>(null)
function Select({ children, value, onChange }: SelectProps) {  const [open, setOpen] = useState(false)  const ctx = useMemo(() => ({ value, onChange, open, setOpen }), [value, onChange, open])
  return (    <SelectContext.Provider value={ctx}>      <div className="select-root">{children}</div>    </SelectContext.Provider>  )}
function Trigger({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  const { open, setOpen } = useSelectContext()  return <button onClick={() => setOpen(!open)}>{children}</button>}
function Options({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  const { open } = useSelectContext()  if (!open) return null  return <ul role="listbox">{children}</ul>}
function Option({ value, children }: OptionProps) {  const { value: selected, onChange, setOpen } = useSelectContext()  return (    <li      role="option"      aria-selected={value === selected}      onClick={() => { onChange(value); setOpen(false) }}    >      {children}    </li>  )}
Select.Trigger = TriggerSelect.Options = OptionsSelect.Option = Option

Usage:

tsx
<Select value={color} onChange={setColor}>  <Select.Trigger>Pick a color</Select.Trigger>  <Select.Options>    <Select.Option value="red">Red</Select.Option>    <Select.Option value="blue">Blue</Select.Option>  </Select.Options></Select>

3. Create Explicit Variant Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Makes each mode a clear, focused component.

When a component has distinct "modes" (dialog vs drawer, inline vs modal, card vs list-item), create explicit variant components instead of toggling with props.

Avoid — one component with mode props:

tsx
function MediaDisplay({ type, src, title, showControls, autoPlay, loop }: Props) {  if (type === 'video') {    return <video src={src} controls={showControls} autoPlay={autoPlay} loop={loop} />  }  if (type === 'audio') {    return <audio src={src} controls={showControls} />  }  return <img src={src} alt={title} />}

Prefer — explicit variants:

tsx
function VideoPlayer({ src, controls, autoPlay, loop }: VideoProps) {  return <video src={src} controls={controls} autoPlay={autoPlay} loop={loop} />}
function AudioPlayer({ src, controls }: AudioProps) {  return <audio src={src} controls={controls} />}
function Image({ src, alt }: ImageProps) {  return <img src={src} alt={alt} />}

Each variant has exactly the props it needs — no impossible states, no unused props.


4. Use Children Over Render Props for Composition

Impact: MEDIUM — Simpler API, better readability.

Render props (renderHeader, renderItem) were essential before hooks, but today children provides cleaner composition for most cases.

Avoid — render prop proliferation:

tsx
<DataTable  data={users}  renderHeader={() => <h2>Users</h2>}  renderRow={(user) => <UserRow user={user} />}  renderEmpty={() => <EmptyState />}  renderFooter={() => <Pagination />}/>

Prefer — children composition:

tsx
<DataTable data={users}>  <DataTable.Header>    <h2>Users</h2>  </DataTable.Header>  <DataTable.Body>    {users.map(user => <UserRow key={user.id} user={user} />)}  </DataTable.Body>  <DataTable.Empty>    <EmptyState />  </DataTable.Empty>  <DataTable.Footer>    <Pagination />  </DataTable.Footer></DataTable>

Reserve render props for cases where the parent needs to provide data to the renderer (e.g., virtualized list items).


5. Decouple State Implementation from UI

Impact: MEDIUM — Swap state management without changing components.

Define a generic interface for your state shape (value, actions, metadata), then let providers implement it. Components consume the interface, not the implementation.

Define the interface:

typescript
interface CounterState {  count: number  increment: () => void  decrement: () => void  isLoading: boolean}
const CounterContext = createContext<CounterState | null>(null)
function useCounter() {  const ctx = useContext(CounterContext)  if (!ctx) throw new Error('useCounter must be used within a CounterProvider')  return ctx}

Implement with local state:

tsx
function LocalCounterProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  const [count, setCount] = useState(0)  const value = useMemo(() => ({    count,    increment: () => setCount(c => c + 1),    decrement: () => setCount(c => c - 1),    isLoading: false,  }), [count])  return <CounterContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CounterContext.Provider>}

Swap to API-backed state without changing consumers:

tsx
function ApiCounterProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  const { data, mutate } = useSWR('/api/counter', fetcher)  const value = useMemo(() => ({    count: data?.count ?? 0,    increment: () => mutate(patch('/api/counter', { delta: 1 })),    decrement: () => mutate(patch('/api/counter', { delta: -1 })),    isLoading: !data,  }), [data, mutate])  return <CounterContext.Provider value={value}>{children}</CounterContext.Provider>}

The useCounter() consumers never change.


6. Lift State to Provider Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Enables sibling communication without prop threading.

When two sibling components need shared state, lift it into a provider rather than threading callbacks through the parent.

Avoid — parent threads state to siblings:

tsx
function Page() {  const [selected, setSelected] = useState<string | null>(null)  return (    <div>      <Sidebar selected={selected} onSelect={setSelected} />      <Detail selected={selected} />    </div>  )}

Prefer — provider manages shared state:

tsx
function SelectionProvider({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  const [selected, setSelected] = useState<string | null>(null)  return (    <SelectionContext.Provider value={{ selected, setSelected }}>      {children}    </SelectionContext.Provider>  )}
function Page() {  return (    <SelectionProvider>      <Sidebar />      <Detail />    </SelectionProvider>  )}

Both Sidebar and Detail consume useSelection() directly.


7. Use Polymorphic as Props for Flexible Elements

Impact: MEDIUM — One component, any underlying element or component.

The as prop pattern lets consumers control the rendered element while keeping your component's styles and behavior.

tsx
type BoxProps<C extends React.ElementType = 'div'> = {  as?: C  children: React.ReactNode} & Omit<React.ComponentPropsWithoutRef<C>, 'as' | 'children'>
function Box<C extends React.ElementType = 'div'>({  as,  children,  ...props}: BoxProps<C>) {  const Component = as || 'div'  return <Component {...props}>{children}</Component>}

Usage:

tsx
<Box>Default div</Box><Box as="section">A section</Box><Box as="a" href="/about">A link</Box><Box as={Link} to="/about">Router link</Box>

8. React 19: Drop forwardRef, Use ref as a Prop

Impact: MEDIUM — Simpler component definitions.

React 19 passes ref as a regular prop. No more forwardRef wrapper.

React 18 (deprecated pattern):

tsx
const Input = forwardRef<HTMLInputElement, InputProps>(function Input(props, ref) {  return <input ref={ref} {...props} />})

React 19:

tsx
function Input({ ref, ...props }: InputProps & { ref?: React.Ref<HTMLInputElement> }) {  return <input ref={ref} {...props} />}

Similarly, use() can read either promises or context and can be called conditionally:

tsx
import { use } from 'react'
function Panel({ themePromise }: { themePromise: Promise<Theme> }) {  const theme = use(themePromise)  // unwraps promise  const user = use(UserContext)    // conditional context read  return <div className={theme.bg}>{user.name}</div>}

9. Slot Pattern for Layout Components

Impact: MEDIUM — Named insertion points without render props.

For layout components with multiple content areas, use a slot pattern based on child type detection or named sub-components.

tsx
function AppLayout({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  const slots = React.Children.toArray(children)  const header = slots.find(    (child): child is React.ReactElement => React.isValidElement(child) && child.type === AppLayout.Header  )  const content = slots.filter(    (child) => !React.isValidElement(child) || child.type !== AppLayout.Header  )
  return (    <div className="app-layout">      <header>{header}</header>      <main>{content}</main>    </div>  )}
AppLayout.Header = function Header({ children }: { children: React.ReactNode }) {  return <>{children}</>}

Usage:

tsx
<AppLayout>  <AppLayout.Header>    <Logo />    <Nav />  </AppLayout.Header>  <Dashboard /></AppLayout>

10. Headless Components for Maximum Flexibility

Impact: HIGH — Logic without opinions about rendering.

Headless components provide behavior (state, keyboard handling, ARIA attributes) without any markup. Consumers supply the rendering.

tsx
function useToggle(initial = false) {  const [on, setOn] = useState(initial)  const toggle = useCallback(() => setOn(o => !o), [])  const buttonProps = {    'aria-pressed': on,    onClick: toggle,    role: 'switch' as const,  }  return { on, toggle, buttonProps }}

Usage — consumer controls all rendering:

tsx
function DarkModeSwitch() {  const { on, buttonProps } = useToggle(false)  return (    <button {...buttonProps} className={on ? 'dark' : 'light'}>      {on ? 'Dark' : 'Light'} Mode    </button>  )}

Libraries like Radix UI, Headless UI, and React Aria follow this pattern. Prefer them over fully-styled component libraries when you need design flexibility.


Source

Patterns from patterns.dev — composition guidance for the broader React community.

Source and attribution

Source:patternsdev/skillsinreact/react-composition-2026at commit48bf58a

License: MIT

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal