Unslop

poteto/noodle/.agents/skills/unslop

by poteto82d2921c52370f23f29086de81ccfb600939c037No licenseListed Oct 9, 2026Updated Oct 9, 2026

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use for docs, READMEs, blog posts, any non-code text that should sound human. Triggers: "unslop", "humanize", "make this sound human", "clean up this writing", "edit for voice", "de-AI this text".

Instructions onlyWriting & Content
AI-generated overview

Edits prose to strip AI writing tells and add a more human voice.

What it does
Provides a checklist of AI writing patterns across content, language, style, communication artifacts and filler, then guides rewriting text to remove them. It also suggests ways to add voice, such as varying rhythm, stating opinions and being specific. The output is revised prose that preserves meaning while sounding less machine-generated.
When to use it
Use it on non-code text such as documentation, READMEs or blog posts that should read as human-written. It fits requests to humanize, de-AI or clean up writing, or to edit for voice.
Requirements
No scripts or tools; it is an instruction-only skill that needs nothing beyond the agent.

Unslop

Edit text to remove AI patterns and add human voice.

Process

  1. Scan for the patterns below
  2. Rewrite — preserve meaning, match intended tone
  3. Add soul (see next section)
  4. Self-audit: "What makes this obviously AI generated?" Fix remaining tells.

Adding soul

Removing patterns is half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is just as obvious.

  • Have opinions. React to facts instead of neutrally listing pros and cons.
  • Vary rhythm. Short sentences. Then longer ones that take their time. Mix it up.
  • Acknowledge complexity. "Impressive but also kind of unsettling" beats "impressive."
  • Use "I" when it fits. First person isn't unprofessional.
  • Let some mess in. Perfect structure feels algorithmic.
  • Be specific. Not "this is concerning" but "there's something unsettling about agents churning away at 3am."

Patterns to detect and fix

Content

  1. Significance inflation — "pivotal moment", "testament to", "evolving landscape", "setting the stage for", "indelible mark", "deeply rooted". Cut puffery, state what happened.
  2. Notability name-dropping — listing media outlets without context. Pick one, say what was said.
  3. Superficial -ing phrases — "highlighting...", "ensuring...", "reflecting...", "showcasing...", "fostering...". Delete or expand with real sources.
  4. Promotional language — "nestled", "vibrant", "breathtaking", "groundbreaking", "renowned", "stunning", "must-visit". Use neutral descriptions.
  5. Vague attributions — "Experts believe", "Industry reports suggest", "Some critics argue". Name the source or delete.
  6. Formulaic challenges — "Despite challenges... continues to thrive." Replace with specific facts.

Language

  1. AI vocabulary — Additionally, crucial, delve, enduring, enhance, fostering, garner, interplay, intricate, landscape (abstract), pivotal, showcase, tapestry (abstract), testament, underscore, vibrant. Replace with plain words.
  2. Copula avoidance — "serves as", "stands as", "boasts", "features". Just say "is" or "has".
  3. Negative parallelisms — "It's not just X, it's Y." State the point directly.
  4. Rule of three — forcing ideas into groups of three. Use the natural number.
  5. Synonym cycling — protagonist/main character/central figure/hero in one paragraph. Pick one, repeat it.
  6. False ranges — "from X to Y" where X and Y aren't on a meaningful scale. List topics directly.

Style

  1. Em dash overuse — avoid em dashes entirely. Use periods, commas, or parentheses. Em dashes are an AI tell.
  2. Colon overuse — colons are fine before a list or example. Not as mid-sentence connectors. "If you're coming from traditional automation: instead of registering event handlers, you describe conditions" adds nothing with the colon. Rewrite to let the point stand on its own without comparison framing. "Describing when the scheduler should fire works best as plain English." Same meaning, no crutch punctuation.
  3. Boldface overuse — don't bold every proper noun or acronym.
  4. Inline-header lists — "Performance: Performance improved..." Convert to prose.
  5. Title case headings — use sentence case.
  6. Decorative emojis — remove from headings and bullets.
  7. Curly quotes — replace with straight quotes.

Communication artifacts

  1. Chatbot phrases — "I hope this helps!", "Let me know if...", "Of course!", "Certainly!" Remove.
  2. Cutoff disclaimers — "While specific details are limited..." Find sources or remove.
  3. Sycophantic tone — "Great question! You're absolutely right!" Respond directly.

Filler

  1. Filler phrases — "In order to" → "To". "Due to the fact that" → "Because". "It is important to note that" → delete.
  2. Excessive hedging — "could potentially possibly be argued that it might" → "may".
  3. Generic conclusions — "The future looks bright." State specific plans or facts.

Source and attribution

Source:poteto/noodlein.agents/skills/unslopat commit82d2921

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal