The user wants to resume work. Optional cwd override: $ARGUMENTS
Quick start
Pick the most recent session whose cwd matches this project, then:
memory_recall { "query": "<session top concepts>", "limit": 10 }.
Expected output:
Why
Match the session by directory boundary, not raw prefix, so a sibling repo never gets mistaken for this one. Never invent observations for an empty session.
Workflow
- Resolve the project path: if
$ARGUMENTSis given, normalize it to absolute (path.resolve(process.cwd(), $ARGUMENTS)); else use the cwd. - Call
memory_sessions. Pick the most recent session whose normalizedcwdmatches by directory boundary: equality, ORcwd.startsWith(projectPath + sep), ORprojectPath.startsWith(cwd + sep). Prefercompletedoverabandoned. No match: report that this project has no matching session and stop. Do not substitute a different project's session. - If the session ended on an unanswered user-facing question, surface it FIRST.
Look in
summaryor recentconversationobservations whosenarrativeends in?. - Summarize: title/summary, key files, key decisions or errors, using
memory_recallon the top concepts, limit 10. Check each result's session or project provenance before including it; a query alone does not enforce scope. - End with one concrete "next step?" pointer.
Anti-patterns
WRONG: session.cwd.startsWith(projectPath) matches /repo-a-staging when the
project is /repo-a, resuming the wrong repo's session.
RIGHT: session.cwd === projectPath || session.cwd.startsWith(projectPath + sep),
a directory-boundary check that cannot cross sibling repos.
Checklist
- cwd override resolved to an absolute, normalized path.
- Match used a directory-boundary check, not a raw prefix.
- Unanswered question (if any) leads the response.
- Empty session is reported plainly, with an offer to start fresh.
See also
recap,session-history,recall: same session data, broader views.
Troubleshooting
See ../_shared/TROUBLESHOOTING.md if memory_sessions or memory_recall is not available.

