Commit Work

by softaworks3027f20f3181No license2.5K starsListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026Repository updated 7 months ago

Create high-quality git commits: review/stage intended changes, split into logical commits, and write clear commit messages (including Conventional Commits). Use when the user asks to commit, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits.

AI-generated overview

Guides reviewing, staging and splitting git changes into logical commits with Conventional Commit messages.

What it does
This skill provides a checklist workflow for preparing git commits: inspecting the working tree, deciding commit boundaries, staging only intended changes (including patch staging for mixed edits), and reviewing the staged diff. It produces final commit messages in Conventional Commits format, a short what/why summary per commit, and the staging and review commands used. It also includes a commit message template reference and a step to run the smallest relevant verification before continuing.
When to use it
Use it when the user asks to commit changes, craft a commit message, stage changes, or split work into multiple commits. It fits repositories where commits should be logically scoped and messages should follow Conventional Commits.
Requirements
Requires a git repository and git available to the agent; no scripts are shipped, only instructions and a reference template. Conventional Commits style is stated as required, and the workflow expects the ability to run git status, git diff, git add -p, git restore --staged, git commit -v, and the repository's fastest relevant check.

Commit work

Goal

Make commits that are easy to review and safe to ship:

  • only intended changes are included
  • commits are logically scoped (split when needed)
  • commit messages describe what changed and why

Inputs to ask for (if missing)

  • Single commit or multiple commits? (If unsure: default to multiple small commits when there are unrelated changes.)
  • Commit style: Conventional Commits are required.
  • Any rules: max subject length, required scopes.

Workflow (checklist)

  1. Inspect the working tree before staging
    • git status
    • git diff (unstaged)
    • If many changes: git diff --stat
  2. Decide commit boundaries (split if needed)
    • Split by: feature vs refactor, backend vs frontend, formatting vs logic, tests vs prod code, dependency bumps vs behavior changes.
    • If changes are mixed in one file, plan to use patch staging.
  3. Stage only what belongs in the next commit
    • Prefer patch staging for mixed changes: git add -p
    • To unstage a hunk/file: git restore --staged -p or git restore --staged <path>
  4. Review what will actually be committed
    • git diff --cached
    • Sanity checks:
      • no secrets or tokens
      • no accidental debug logging
      • no unrelated formatting churn
  5. Describe the staged change in 1-2 sentences (before writing the message)
    • "What changed?" + "Why?"
    • If you cannot describe it cleanly, the commit is probably too big or mixed; go back to step 2.
  6. Write the commit message
    • Use Conventional Commits (required):
      • type(scope): short summary
      • blank line
      • body (what/why, not implementation diary)
      • footer (BREAKING CHANGE) if needed
    • Prefer an editor for multi-line messages: git commit -v
    • Use references/commit-message-template.md if helpful.
  7. Run the smallest relevant verification
    • Run the repo's fastest meaningful check (unit tests, lint, or build) before moving on.
  8. Repeat for the next commit until the working tree is clean

Deliverable

Provide:

  • the final commit message(s)
  • a short summary per commit (what/why)
  • the commands used to stage/review (at minimum: git diff --cached, plus any tests run)

Source and attribution

Source:softaworks/agent-toolkitinskills/commit-workat commit3027f20

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal