Review Pr

tirth8205/code-review-graph/skills/review-pr

by tirth82056b12d11625cbec3b6773e076cb3d136464fa90e5No licenseListed Oct 9, 2026Updated Oct 9, 2026

Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.

Instructions onlySoftware Development
AI-generated overview

Reviews a pull request or branch diff using a knowledge graph for structural context and blast-radius analysis.

What it does
Guides an agent through reviewing all commits of a pull request or branch against its base branch. It uses knowledge-graph tools to detect risk-scored changed functions, test gaps and affected flows, then queries callers and tests for high-risk functions. It produces a structured review containing a summary, risk level, blast radius, per-file changes and impact, missing tests, and recommendations.
When to use it
Use it when reviewing a pull request or branch diff and you want structural context such as callers, dependents and test coverage. It suits reviews where blast radius and missing tests matter, not just line-level comments.
Requirements
Requires git access to the repository and the knowledge-graph tools named in the instructions (context, graph build/update, change detection, review context, impact radius, semantic search). Ships no scripts; instructions only.

Review PR

Review all commits of a pull request or branch against its base branch.

Steps

  1. Identify the changes. With a branch name run git diff --name-only main...<branch>; otherwise diff the current branch against main (or master). Use that ref as base below.
  2. Call get_minimal_context_tool(task="review PR", base="main"). If it returns status: not_ready, call build_or_update_graph_tool() and continue.
  3. Call detect_changes_tool(base="main", detail_level="minimal") for risk-scored changed functions, test gaps and affected flows across the whole branch.
  4. For high-risk functions call query_graph_tool(pattern="callers_of", target="<function>") and query_graph_tool(pattern="tests_for", target="<function>"). Flag public API changes whose callers were not updated.
  5. Call get_review_context_tool(base="main") for source snippets, or get_impact_radius_tool(base="main") for the full dependent list, only when step 3 leaves a high-risk item unclear.
  6. Read the changed source of the highest-impact files first. Do not load whole files unless the change needs it.

Output

## PR Review: <title>
### Summary<1-3 sentences>
### Risk- Overall: Low / Medium / High- Blast radius: <n> files, <m> functions- Test coverage: <covered> of <changed> changed functions
### Files#### <path>- Changes: <what>- Impact: <who depends on it>- Issues: <bugs, style, concerns>
### Missing Tests- <function> in <file>
### Recommendations1. <action>

Tips

  • Use semantic_search_nodes_tool to find related code the PR may have missed.

Source and attribution

Source:tirth8205/code-review-graphinskills/review-prat commit6b12d11

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal