Multi Reviewer Patterns

by wshobson46891e7e60daNo licenseListed Oct 8, 2026Updated Oct 8, 2026

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.

Instructions onlySoftware Development

AI-generated overview

Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and reporting.

What it does: Provides guidance for organizing multi-reviewer code reviews across dimensions such as security, performance, architecture, testing, and accessibility. It defines merge rules and a deduplication process for findings reported at the same location, severity criteria and calibration rules, and a consolidated report template with a summary table.
When to use it: Use when organizing a multi-dimensional code review, deciding which review dimensions to assign, deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers, calibrating severity ratings consistently, or producing a consolidated review report. It is suited to code handling user input or authentication, data access or hot path changes, structural changes, new functionality, and UI or frontend changes. It is not for writing or debugging code itself.
Requirements: No scripts or tools required; instructions only, with a reference file on review dimensions.

Multi-Reviewer Patterns

Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and producing consolidated reports.

When to Use This Skill

Organizing a multi-dimensional code review
Deciding which review dimensions to assign
Deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers
Calibrating severity ratings consistently
Producing a consolidated review report

Review Dimension Allocation

Available Dimensions

Dimension	Focus	When to Include
Security	Vulnerabilities, auth, input validation	Always for code handling user input or auth
Performance	Query efficiency, memory, caching	When changing data access or hot paths
Architecture	SOLID, coupling, patterns	For structural changes or new modules
Testing	Coverage, quality, edge cases	When adding new functionality
Accessibility	WCAG, ARIA, keyboard nav	For UI/frontend changes

Recommended Combinations

Scenario	Dimensions
API endpoint changes	Security, Performance, Architecture
Frontend component	Architecture, Testing, Accessibility
Database migration	Performance, Architecture
Authentication changes	Security, Testing
Full feature review	Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing

Finding Deduplication

When multiple reviewers report issues at the same location:

Merge Rules

Same file:line, same issue — Merge into one finding, credit all reviewers
Same file:line, different issues — Keep as separate findings
Same issue, different locations — Keep separate but cross-reference
Conflicting severity — Use the higher severity rating
Conflicting recommendations — Include both with reviewer attribution

Deduplication Process

For each finding in all reviewer reports:  1. Check if another finding references the same file:line  2. If yes, check if they describe the same issue  3. If same issue: merge, keeping the more detailed description  4. If different issue: keep both, tag as "co-located"  5. Use highest severity among merged findings

For each finding in all reviewer reports:  1. Check if another finding references the same file:line  2. If yes, check if they describe the same issue  3. If same issue: merge, keeping the more detailed description  4. If different issue: keep both, tag as "co-located"  5. Use highest severity among merged findings

Severity Calibration

Severity Criteria

Severity	Impact	Likelihood	Examples
Critical	Data loss, security breach, complete failure	Certain or very likely	SQL injection, auth bypass, data corruption
High	Significant functionality impact, degradation	Likely	Memory leak, missing validation, broken flow
Medium	Partial impact, workaround exists	Possible	N+1 query, missing edge case, unclear error
Low	Minimal impact, cosmetic	Unlikely	Style issue, minor optimization, naming

Calibration Rules

Security vulnerabilities exploitable by external users: always Critical or High
Performance issues in hot paths: at least Medium
Missing tests for critical paths: at least Medium
Accessibility violations for core functionality: at least Medium
Code style issues with no functional impact: Low

Consolidated Report Template

markdown

## Code Review Report
**Target**: {files/PR/directory}**Reviewers**: {dimension-1}, {dimension-2}, {dimension-3}**Date**: {date}**Files Reviewed**: {count}
### Critical Findings ({count})
#### [CR-001] {Title}
**Location**: `{file}:{line}`**Dimension**: {Security/Performance/etc.}**Description**: {what was found}**Impact**: {what could happen}**Fix**: {recommended remediation}
### High Findings ({count})
...
### Medium Findings ({count})
...
### Low Findings ({count})
...
### Summary
| Dimension    | Critical | High  | Medium | Low   | Total  || ------------ | -------- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ || Security     | 1        | 2     | 3      | 0     | 6      || Performance  | 0        | 1     | 4      | 2     | 7      || Architecture | 0        | 0     | 2      | 3     | 5      || **Total**    | **1**    | **3** | **9**  | **5** | **18** |
### Recommendation
{Overall assessment and prioritized action items}

## Code Review Report
**Target**: {files/PR/directory}**Reviewers**: {dimension-1}, {dimension-2}, {dimension-3}**Date**: {date}**Files Reviewed**: {count}
### Critical Findings ({count})
#### [CR-001] {Title}
**Location**: `{file}:{line}`**Dimension**: {Security/Performance/etc.}**Description**: {what was found}**Impact**: {what could happen}**Fix**: {recommended remediation}
### High Findings ({count})
...
### Medium Findings ({count})
...
### Low Findings ({count})
...
### Summary
| Dimension    | Critical | High  | Medium | Low   | Total  || ------------ | -------- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ || Security     | 1        | 2     | 3      | 0     | 6      || Performance  | 0        | 1     | 4      | 2     | 7      || Architecture | 0        | 0     | 2      | 3     | 5      || **Total**    | **1**    | **3** | **9**  | **5** | **18** |
### Recommendation
{Overall assessment and prioritized action items}

Source and attribution

Source:wshobson/agentsinplugins/agent-teams/skills/multi-reviewer-patternsat commit46891e7

License: No license

Content belongs to its original authors. SourceWeft indexes it from a public repository.

Report or request removal

Multi Reviewer Patterns

Multi-Reviewer Patterns

When to Use This Skill

Review Dimension Allocation

Available Dimensions

Recommended Combinations

Finding Deduplication

Merge Rules

Deduplication Process

Severity Calibration

Severity Criteria

Calibration Rules

Consolidated Report Template

Source and attribution

More from wshobson/agents

Uv Package Manager

Web Component Design

Python Type Safety

Visual Design Foundations

Responsive Design

Python Resource Management

More in Software Development

Playground

M5 Onboard

Cardputer Buddy

Dpop Adoption

Gemini Live Api

Gemini Api