Unbounded Query

adobe/skills/plugins/aem/cloud-service/skills/code-assessment/unbounded-query

作者 adobe940b8795c0dfApache-2.0197 个星标收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库今天更新

AEM Cloud Service expert skill — handle an explicitly-unbounded query (`p.limit=-1` predicate or JCR `setLimit(-1)`): bound it when capping is provably safe, otherwise flag it for human pagination. Use for "bound my query", "unbounded query", "query causing OOM", or a scan that flags `p.limit=-1`. Top CSO OOM cause: an unbounded result set traversed in a loop fills the heap and saturates the instance. The analyzer locates the explicit markers; the recipe triages each by how the result is consumed — single-result → 1, already-bounded list → N, iterate-all on the request path → escalate. Never silently cap a result the caller reads in full.

AI 生成的概览

对 AEM Cloud Service 中无界查询(p.limit=-1 或 setLimit(-1))进行分诊,仅在可证明安全处加界,其余标记待人工处理。

功能
该技能处理 AEM Cloud Service 中显式无界的查询,识别依据是 QueryBuilder 的 p.limit=-1 谓词或 JCR 的 setLimit(-1) 调用。它按结果的消费方式对每个被标记的调用点分类,仅在可证明安全时施加较窄的界限,例如只读取单条结果或列表本身已有界的情况。在请求路径上遍历全部行的调用点不做修改,而是升级为人工分页处理。它从不提交,所有已应用的修改都在 diff 中审核。
适用场景
当某个查询与内存溢出或堆内存事故相关、扫描标记出无界查询,或有人要求为查询加界时使用。适用于“为我的查询加界”“无界查询”“导致 OOM 的查询”等请求。不适用于已设置正数界限的查询,也不适用于对已有界查询做分页调优。
运行要求
仅为说明性内容,不附带脚本。需要 AEM Cloud Service 代码库,并引用了分析脚本和运行手册文件,这些文件不在本技能文件夹内。

Unbounded query — AEM as a Cloud Service

This pattern is executed by the code-assessment runbook — follow ../references/runbook.md for the full flow (preflight → plan → apply → verify, run log). This skill supplies the detection + recipe the runbook applies.

Overview

A query asked to return everything — a QueryBuilder predicate p.limit=-1, or a JCR Query.setLimit(-1) — loads the entire result set into heap. When that result grows and the rows are traversed in a loop, the heap fills and the instance OOMs: this is the top co-occurring cause of out-of-memory outages in the CSO dataset.

-1 means the caller wants every row, so capping is not behaviour-neutral. Lowering it to a fixed bound silently drops rows whenever the real result exceeds the cap — trading a loud OOM for a silent data/count/UI bug. So this pattern does not blanket-cap: it triages each site by how the result is consumed (Resolution contract below), bounds only where that is provably safe, and escalates the rest for human pagination rather than editing them. The skill never commits — every applied edit is reviewed in the diff.

Classification — confirm this pattern applies

  • A QueryBuilder predicate map sets p.limit to -1 (…put("p.limit", "-1")), or a JCR/javax.jcr.query.Query (or QueryManager-built query) calls setLimit(-1).
  • The user asks to "bound a query", mentions an "unbounded query", or a query implicated in an OOM / heap incident; or a scan flagged unbounded-query.
  • Not this pattern: a query that already sets a positive bound (p.limit=100, setLimit(100)); a -1 on a different predicate key (only p.limit is the marker); pagination tuning of an already-bounded query.

Discovery

Detection is performed by the analyzer (../scripts/analyze.sh), run by the runbook:

bash
bash ../scripts/analyze.sh <workspace-root> --pattern unbounded-query

Match criteria (what the detector flags): the two explicit unbounded markers, matched on source literals (parse-level, no type resolution):

  • …put("p.limit", "-1") — a QueryBuilder predicate-map entry whose key is exactly p.limit and value is "-1", written inline or referenced through a same-file final constant (e.g. UNLIMITED_RESULT = "-1").
  • …setLimit(-1) — a setLimit call whose single argument is -1, inline or via a same-file final constant.

Emitted at the call's line, with the call as the snippet. The match is on the marker value (literal or a same-file constant resolving to it), so a bounded query ("100", setLimit(100)) or a -1 on any other key is not flagged — precise by construction, no scope analysis needed.

Resolution contract

guided — triage each flagged site by how the result is consumed; the safe automatic edit is narrow, and the default for "iterate-all on the request path" is to flag for human pagination, not edit. Cardinal rule: never silently cap a result the caller reads in full.

Call-site shapeActionDisposition
Single-result — reads first hit only (.get(0), .next() once, getFirstResource()), no getTotalMatches()bound → 1apply
Already-bounded list — caller shows top-N / already pagesbound → N / page sizeapply
Iterate-all, local + simple — query build + result loop in one method, stable sort, no post-filterwrap in p.offset loopapply (mark review)
Iterate-all, request path — cross-method, post-filtered, aggregate/count, or unsorteddo not editskipped: needs-pagination
Off-request migration / batchskipskipped: bound-changes-correctness
Test code (src/test/)skipskipped: test-scope

Bounding is the exception (provably safe sites); escalation is the default when safety cannot be proven. The recipe gives the per-branch edits and the exact reason strings.

Review checklist

  • The fix matches how the result is consumed (single-hit → 1; bounded list → N; iterate-all → paginate or escalate)
  • No request-path query that consumes all rows was silently capped — those are skipped: needs-pagination
  • Where a bound was applied, the caller cannot legitimately exceed it (or paging was added)
  • No getTotalMatches() / count dependency broken by the new limit
  • Paging (where added) has a stable sort and survives any post-query filter
  • Surgical edit — no reformatting

Recipe

Read recipe.md [blocked] in full before editing: input contract, the triage decision table, per-branch edits (QueryBuilder predicate, JCR setLimit, offset paging), the escalation reason strings, skip policy, before/after, editing strategy.

Handoff

The skill never commits. See ../references/git-workflow.md for git vs in-place handoff and the suggested commit message.

来源与署名

来源:adobe/skills位于plugins/aem/cloud-service/skills/code-assessment/unbounded-query提交940b879

许可证: Apache-2.0

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架