Automation Audit Ops

affaan-m/ECC/skills/automation-audit-ops

作者 affaan-mef648e01899ba3e8dc6371642deaaf64b4477775无许可证275K 个星标收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日仓库4天前更新

Evidence-first automation inventory and overlap audit workflow for ECC. Use when the user wants to know which jobs, hooks, connectors, MCP servers, or wrappers are live, broken, redundant, or missing before fixing anything.

AI 生成的概览

审计在用的自动化、任务、钩子、连接器和 MCP 服务器,并给出保留、合并、裁撤或优先修复的建议。

功能
该技能对自动化面进行以证据为先的审计:仓库钩子、GitHub Actions 与定时工作流、MCP 配置与已启用服务器、连接器、应用集成以及包装脚本。它按运行状态(已配置、已认证、近期验证过、陈旧或损坏、完全缺失)和问题类型对每一项分类,并追溯具体证据路径,如文件路径、工作流运行记录、钩子日志或失败特征。最后输出保留、合并、裁撤或优先修复的建议集,并按固定格式给出当前面、发现、建议和下一步动作。
适用场景
当用户询问哪些自动化在运行、哪些已损坏、哪些重复或缺失,或想了解哪些工具和连接器真正在发挥作用时使用。它适合已积累多种重复做法、需要在动手修复前收敛为单一规范路径的工作区。
运行要求
不附带脚本,仅为指令。它假定智能体能够读取实际工作区面,例如钩子脚本、工作流定义、MCP 与连接器配置、日志和命令输出。其中引用的其他 ECC 原生技能为可选输入。

Automation Audit Ops

Use this when the user asks what automations are live, which jobs are broken, where overlap exists, or what tooling and connectors are actually doing useful work right now.

This is an audit-first operator skill. The job is to produce an evidence-backed inventory and a keep / merge / cut / fix-next recommendation set before rewriting anything.

Skill Stack

Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:

  • workspace-surface-audit for connector, MCP, hook, and app inventory
  • knowledge-ops when the audit needs to reconcile live repo truth with durable context
  • github-ops when the answer depends on CI, scheduled workflows, issues, or PR automation
  • ecc-tools-cost-audit when the real problem is webhook fanout, queued jobs, or billing burn in the sibling app repo
  • research-ops when local inventory must be compared against current platform support or public docs
  • verification-loop for proving post-fix state instead of relying on assumed recovery

When to Use

  • user asks "what automations do I have", "what is live", "what is broken", or "what overlaps"
  • the task spans cron jobs, GitHub Actions, local hooks, MCP servers, connectors, wrappers, or app integrations
  • the user wants to know what was ported from another agent system and what still needs to be rebuilt inside ECC
  • the workspace has accumulated multiple ways to do the same thing and the user wants one canonical lane

Guardrails

  • start read-only unless the user explicitly asked for fixes
  • separate:
    • configured
    • authenticated
    • recently verified
    • stale or broken
    • missing entirely
  • do not claim a tool is live just because a skill or config references it
  • do not merge or delete overlapping surfaces until the evidence table exists

Workflow

1. Inventory the real surface

Read the current live surface before theorizing:

  • repo hooks and local hook scripts
  • GitHub Actions and scheduled workflows
  • MCP configs and enabled servers
  • connector- or app-backed integrations
  • wrapper scripts and repo-specific automation entrypoints

Group them by surface:

  • local runtime
  • repo CI / automation
  • connected external systems
  • messaging / notifications
  • billing / customer operations
  • research / monitoring

2. Classify each item by live state

For every surfaced automation, mark:

  • configured
  • authenticated
  • recently verified
  • stale or broken
  • missing

Then classify the problem type:

  • active breakage
  • auth outage
  • stale status
  • overlap or redundancy
  • missing capability

3. Trace the proof path

Back every important claim with a concrete source:

  • file path
  • workflow run
  • hook log
  • config entry
  • recent command output
  • exact failure signature

If the current state is ambiguous, say so directly instead of pretending the audit is complete.

4. End with keep / merge / cut / fix-next

For each overlapping or suspect surface, return one call:

  • keep
  • merge
  • cut
  • fix next

The value is in collapsing noisy automation into one canonical ECC lane, not in preserving every historical path.

Output Format

text
CURRENT SURFACE- automation- source- live state- proof
FINDINGS- active breakage- overlap- stale status- missing capability
RECOMMENDATION- keep- merge- cut- fix next
NEXT ECC MOVE- exact skill / hook / workflow / app lane to strengthen

Pitfalls

  • do not answer from memory when the live inventory can be read
  • do not treat "present in config" as "working"
  • do not fix lower-value redundancy before naming the broken high-signal path
  • do not widen the task into a repo rewrite if the user asked for inventory first

Verification

  • important claims cite a live proof path
  • each surfaced automation is labeled with a clear live-state category
  • the final recommendation distinguishes keep / merge / cut / fix-next

来源与署名

来源:affaan-m/ECC位于skills/automation-audit-ops提交ef648e0

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架