Gateguard

作者 affaan-mef648e01899b无许可证275K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库3天前更新

API、エージェント、およびLLMエンドポイントのアクセス制御と認可パターン。

AI 生成的概览

一个 PreToolUse 钩子,在代码修改前拦截首次编辑并强制收集事实。

功能
GateGuard 是一个 PreToolUse 钩子,会拒绝首次 Edit、Write 或 Bash 尝试,告知模型需要收集哪些具体事实,并在事实呈现后允许重试。它为编辑、新建文件、破坏性 Bash 命令和常规 Bash 命令分别定义了门禁,并给出对比启用与未启用门禁的 A/B 测试结果。它仅包含说明,可通过项目配置文件或环境变量进行配置。
适用场景
适用于编辑会影响多个模块的代码库、包含具有特定模式或日期格式的数据文件的项目,以及 AI 生成代码必须符合既有模式的团队。它面向模型倾向于猜测而非调查的工作流程。
运行要求
不包含脚本,仅为说明。方案 A 引用 ECC 钩子文件和 hooks.json;方案 B 需要安装 gateguard-ai Python 包并运行 gateguard init 以生成 .gateguard.yml 配置文件。

GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate

A PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation ("are you sure?"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.

When to Activate

  • Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules
  • Projects with data files that have specific schemas or date formats
  • Teams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns
  • Any workflow where Claude tends to guess instead of investigating

Core Concept

LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.

But asking "list every file that imports this module" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.

Three-stage gate:

1. DENY  — block the first Edit/Write/Bash attempt2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presented

No competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.

Evidence

Two independent A/B tests, identical agents, same task:

TaskGatedUngatedGap
Analytics module8.0/106.5/10+1.5
Webhook validator10.0/107.0/10+3.0
Average9.06.75+2.25

Both agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.

Gate Types

Edit / MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)

MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.

Before editing {file_path}, present these facts:
1. List ALL files that import/require this file (search the tree — Glob/Grep, or find/grep via Bash)2. List the public functions/classes affected by this change3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim

Write Gate (first new file creation)

Before creating {file_path}, present these facts:
1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (search the tree — Glob/Grep, or find/grep via Bash)3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,   and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim

Destructive Bash Gate (every destructive command)

Triggers on: rm -rf, git reset --hard, git push --force, drop table, etc.

1. List all files/data this command will modify or delete2. Write a one-line rollback procedure3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatim

Routine Bash Gate (once per session)

1. The current user request in one sentence2. What this specific command verifies or produces

Quick Start

Option A: Use the ECC hook (zero install)

The hook at scripts/hooks/gateguard-fact-force.js is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.

If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with ECC_GATEGUARD=off. For hook-level control, keep using ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS with the GateGuard hook ID.

Option B: Full package with config

bash
pip install gateguard-aigateguard init

This adds .gateguard.yml for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles).

Anti-Patterns

  • Don't use self-evaluation instead. "Are you sure?" always gets "yes." This is experimentally verified.
  • Don't skip the data schema check. Both A/B test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used %Y/%m/%d %H:%M. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs.
  • Don't gate every single Bash command. Routine bash gates once per session. Destructive bash gates every time. This balance avoids slowdown while catching real risks.

Best Practices

  • Let the gate fire naturally. Don't try to pre-answer the gate questions — the investigation itself is what improves quality.
  • Customize gate messages for your domain. If your project has specific conventions, add them to the gate prompts.
  • Use .gateguard.yml to ignore paths like .venv/, node_modules/, .git/.

Related Skills

  • safety-guard — Runtime safety checks (complementary, not overlapping)
  • code-reviewer — Post-edit review (GateGuard is pre-edit investigation)

来源与署名

来源:affaan-m/ecc位于docs/ja-JP/skills/gateguard提交ef648e0

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架