Hipaa Compliance

作者 affaan-mef648e01899b无许可证275K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库3天前更新

HIPAA準拠実装、セキュリティ対策、監査ログ、およびデータ保護戦略。

AI 生成的概览

为处理 PHI 的美国医疗软件提供 HIPAA 合规决策指导、防护规则和升级路径。

功能
该技能是处理美国医疗合规任务时的 HIPAA 专用入口。它提供决策关卡,用于判断数据是否为 PHI、相关方是否属于受覆盖实体或业务伙伴、是否需要 BAA,以及访问和审计是否满足最小必要标准。它还列出了在日志、分析、提示词、URL 和第三方工具中处理 PHI 的防护规则,并指向相关的实施与审查技能。
适用场景
当请求明确提到 HIPAA、PHI、受覆盖实体、业务伙伴或 BAA 时使用。它也适用于构建或审查存储、处理、导出或传输 PHI 的美国医疗软件,以及评估日志、分析、LLM 提示词、存储或支持工作流是否存在 HIPAA 风险。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具;这是仅含说明的技能。它引用了 healthcare-phi-compliance、healthcare-reviewer 和 security-review 等其他技能,但这些技能不包含在此文件夹中。

HIPAA Compliance

Use this as the HIPAA-specific entrypoint when a task is clearly about US healthcare compliance. This skill intentionally stays thin and canonical:

  • healthcare-phi-compliance remains the primary implementation skill for PHI/PII handling, data classification, audit logging, encryption, and leak prevention.
  • healthcare-reviewer remains the specialized reviewer when code, architecture, or product behavior needs a healthcare-aware second pass.
  • security-review still applies for general auth, input-handling, secrets, API, and deployment hardening.

When to Use

  • The request explicitly mentions HIPAA, PHI, covered entities, business associates, or BAAs
  • Building or reviewing US healthcare software that stores, processes, exports, or transmits PHI
  • Assessing whether logging, analytics, LLM prompts, storage, or support workflows create HIPAA exposure
  • Designing patient-facing or clinician-facing systems where minimum necessary access and auditability matter

How It Works

Treat HIPAA as an overlay on top of the broader healthcare privacy skill:

  1. Start with healthcare-phi-compliance for the concrete implementation rules.
  2. Apply HIPAA-specific decision gates:
    • Is this data PHI?
    • Is this actor a covered entity or business associate?
    • Does a vendor or model provider require a BAA before touching the data?
    • Is access limited to the minimum necessary scope?
    • Are read/write/export events auditable?
  3. Escalate to healthcare-reviewer if the task affects patient safety, clinical workflows, or regulated production architecture.

HIPAA-Specific Guardrails

  • Never place PHI in logs, analytics events, crash reports, prompts, or client-visible error strings.
  • Never expose PHI in URLs, browser storage, screenshots, or copied example payloads.
  • Require authenticated access, scoped authorization, and audit trails for PHI reads and writes.
  • Treat third-party SaaS, observability, support tooling, and LLM providers as blocked-by-default until BAA status and data boundaries are clear.
  • Follow minimum necessary access: the right user should only see the smallest PHI slice needed for the task.
  • Prefer opaque internal IDs over names, MRNs, phone numbers, addresses, or other identifiers.

Examples

Example 1: Product request framed as HIPAA

User request:

Add AI-generated visit summaries to our clinician dashboard. We serve US clinics and need to stay HIPAA compliant.

Response pattern:

  • Activate hipaa-compliance
  • Use healthcare-phi-compliance to review PHI movement, logging, storage, and prompt boundaries
  • Verify whether the summarization provider is covered by a BAA before any PHI is sent
  • Escalate to healthcare-reviewer if the summaries influence clinical decisions

Example 2: Vendor/tooling decision

User request:

Can we send support transcripts and patient messages into our analytics stack?

Response pattern:

  • Assume those messages may contain PHI
  • Block the design unless the analytics vendor is approved for HIPAA-bound workloads and the data path is minimized
  • Require redaction or a non-PHI event model when possible

Related Skills

  • healthcare-phi-compliance
  • healthcare-reviewer
  • healthcare-emr-patterns
  • healthcare-eval-harness
  • security-review

来源与署名

来源:affaan-m/ecc位于docs/ja-JP/skills/hipaa-compliance提交ef648e0

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架