Product Lens

affaan-m/ECC/pi/core/skills/product-lens

作者 affaan-mef648e01899ba3e8dc6371642deaaf64b4477775无许可证275K 个星标收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日仓库4天前更新

Validate the why before building through four product diagnostics — a YC-style product diagnostic that produces PRODUCT-BRIEF.md with a go/no-go recommendation, a founder review scoring product-market-fit signals, a user journey audit measuring time-to-value, and ICE feature prioritization. Use when pressure-testing product direction, choosing between features, sanity-checking a launch, or converting a vague idea into a product brief.

AI 生成的概览

提供四种产品诊断:YC 式产品简报、创始人评审、用户旅程审计与 ICE 功能优先级排序。

功能
该技能包含四种产品诊断模式:YC 式诊断,通过提出关键问题产出带风险与 go/no-go 建议的 PRODUCT-BRIEF.md;创始人评审,读取项目文件并对产品市场契合信号打分;用户旅程审计,梳理摩擦点与价值实现时间;以及基于 ICE 的功能优先级排序,将候选功能排成路线图。所有模式都旨在输出可执行的文档并给出明确的下一步,而不是长篇论述。它明确只负责产品诊断,不负责可直接实施的规格撰写,当简报需要转化为能力计划时会交接给 product-capability。
适用场景
适用于开始开发功能前验证“为什么做”、每周产品复盘、在多个功能之间取舍、发布前检查用户旅程,以及在工程规划前把模糊想法整理成产品简报。
运行要求
仅为说明文档,不附带脚本。模式 2 会读取 README、CLAUDE.md、package.json 及近期提交等项目文件,模式 3 需要以新用户身份克隆或安装产品,因此需要仓库与产品访问权限。文中还引用了配套命令(/browser-qa、/design-system audit、/canary-watch)以及 product-capability 环节。

Product Lens — Think Before You Build

This lane owns product diagnosis, not implementation-ready specification writing.

If the user needs a durable PRD-to-SRS or capability-contract artifact, hand off to product-capability.

When to Use

  • Before starting any feature — validate the "why"
  • Weekly product review — are we building the right thing?
  • When stuck choosing between features
  • Before a launch — sanity check the user journey
  • When converting a vague idea into a product brief before engineering planning starts

How It Works

Mode 1: Product Diagnostic

Like YC office hours but automated. Asks the hard questions:

1. Who is this for? (specific person, not "developers")2. What's the pain? (quantify: how often, how bad, what do they do today?)3. Why now? (what changed that makes this possible/necessary?)4. What's the 10-star version? (if money/time were unlimited)5. What's the MVP? (smallest thing that proves the thesis)6. What's the anti-goal? (what are you explicitly NOT building?)7. How do you know it's working? (metric, not vibes)

Output: a PRODUCT-BRIEF.md with answers, risks, and a go/no-go recommendation.

If the result is "yes, build this," the next lane is product-capability, not more founder-theater.

Mode 2: Founder Review

Reviews your current project through a founder lens:

1. Read README, CLAUDE.md, package.json, recent commits2. Infer: what is this trying to be?3. Score: product-market fit signals (0-10)   - Usage growth trajectory   - Retention indicators (repeat contributors, return users)   - Revenue signals (pricing page, billing code, Stripe integration)   - Competitive moat (what's hard to copy?)4. Identify: the one thing that would 10x this5. Flag: things you're building that don't matter

Mode 3: User Journey Audit

Maps the actual user experience:

1. Clone/install the product as a new user2. Document every friction point (confusing steps, errors, missing docs)3. Time each step4. Compare to competitor onboarding5. Score: time-to-value (how long until the user gets their first win?)6. Recommend: top 3 fixes for onboarding

Mode 4: Feature Prioritization

When you have 10 ideas and need to pick 2:

1. List all candidate features2. Score each on: impact (1-5) × confidence (1-5) ÷ effort (1-5)3. Rank by ICE score4. Apply constraints: runway, team size, dependencies5. Output: prioritized roadmap with rationale

Output

All modes output actionable docs, not essays. Every recommendation has a specific next step.

Integration

Pair with:

  • /browser-qa to verify the user journey audit findings
  • /design-system audit for visual polish assessment
  • /canary-watch for post-launch monitoring
  • product-capability when the product brief needs to become an implementation-ready capability plan

来源与署名

来源:affaan-m/ECC位于pi/core/skills/product-lens提交ef648e0

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架