Competitive Intel

alirezarezvani/claude-skills/c-level-advisor/skills/competitive-intel

作者 alirezarezvani19392f7a0826MIT27K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库5周前更新

Systematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.

AI 生成的概览

指导系统化的竞争对手跟踪,产出销售作战卡、定位简报和赢单/丢单分析。

功能
该技能提供一套结构化的竞争情报工作流程,涵盖竞争对手识别、跟踪维度、SWOT 与定位图分析以及功能差距分析。它定义了面向销售的作战卡、面向营销的定位更新、面向产品的功能差距摘要和面向管理层的一页简报等输出格式,并给出月度、事件触发和季度的执行节奏。它还概述了赢单/丢单访谈流程以及各高管角色的情报分发职责。该技能不包含脚本,仅引用一份操作手册和一个作战卡模板。
适用场景
适用于分析竞争对手、制作销售作战卡、跟踪市场动向或将产品与替代方案进行定位时。也适用于赢单/丢单分析和周期性的竞争格局复盘。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具,仅为说明性内容。它引用两个随附文件:references/ci-playbook.md 和 templates/battlecard-template.md,并假定可访问评测网站、融资数据库和招聘信息等外部来源用于调研。

Competitive Intelligence

Systematic competitor tracking. Not obsession — intelligence that drives real decisions.

Keywords

competitive intelligence, competitor analysis, battlecard, win/loss analysis, competitive positioning, competitive tracking, market intelligence, competitor research, SWOT, competitive map, feature gap analysis, competitive strategy

Quick Start

Ask in natural language for the deliverable you need:

"Map our competitive landscape" — direct, indirect, and future competitors "Build a battlecard for [competitor]" — sales-ready battlecard "Run a win/loss analysis" — recent wins and losses by reason "What did [competitor] do recently?" — competitor update tracking "Build a competitive positioning map" — 2x2 positioning map

Framework: 5-Layer Intelligence System

Layer 1: Competitor Identification

Direct competitors: Same ICP, same problem, comparable solution, similar price point. Indirect competitors: Same budget, different solution (including "do nothing" and "build in-house"). Future competitors: Well-funded startups in adjacent space; large incumbents with stated roadmap overlap.

The 2x2 Threat Matrix:

Same ICPDifferent ICP
Same problemDirect threatAdjacent (watch)
Different problemDisplacement riskIgnore for now

Update this quarterly. Who's moved quadrants?

Layer 2: Tracking Dimensions

Track these 8 dimensions per competitor:

DimensionSourcesCadence
Product movesChangelog, G2/Capterra reviews, Twitter/LinkedInMonthly
Pricing changesPricing page, sales call intel, customer feedbackTriggered
FundingCrunchbase, TechCrunch, LinkedInTriggered
Hiring signalsLinkedIn job postings, IndeedMonthly
PartnershipsPress releases, co-marketingTriggered
Customer winsCase studies, review sites, LinkedInMonthly
Customer lossesWin/loss interviews, churned accountsOngoing
Messaging shiftsHomepage, ads (Facebook/Google Ad Library)Quarterly

Layer 3: Analysis Frameworks

SWOT per Competitor:

  • Strengths: What do they do well? Where do they win?
  • Weaknesses: Where do they lose? What do customers complain about?
  • Opportunities: What could they do that would threaten you?
  • Threats: What's their existential risk?

Competitive Positioning Map (2 axis): Choose axes that matter for your buyers:

  • Common: Price vs Feature Depth; Enterprise-ready vs SMB-ready; Easy to implement vs Configurable
  • Pick axes that show YOUR differentiation clearly

Feature Gap Analysis:

FeatureYouCompetitor ACompetitor BGap status
[Feature]✅✅❌Your advantage
[Feature]❌✅✅Gap — roadmap?
[Feature]✅❌❌Moat
[Feature]❌❌✅Competitor B only

Layer 4: Output Formats

For Sales (CRO): Battlecards — one page per competitor, designed for pre-call prep. See templates/battlecard-template.md

For Marketing (CMO): Positioning update — message shifts, new differentiators, claims to stop or start making.

For Product (CPO): Feature gap summary — what customers ask for that we don't have, what competitors ship, what to reprioritize.

For CEO/Board: Monthly competitive summary — 1-page: who moved, what it means, recommended responses.

Layer 5: Intelligence Cadence

Monthly (scheduled):

  • Review all tier-1 competitors (direct threats, top 3)
  • Update battlecards with new intel
  • Publish 1-page summary to leadership

Triggered (event-based):

  • Competitor raises funding → assess implications within 48 hours
  • Competitor launches major feature → product + sales response within 1 week
  • Competitor poaches key customer → win/loss interview within 2 weeks
  • Competitor changes pricing → analyze and respond within 1 week

Quarterly:

  • Full competitive landscape review
  • Update positioning map
  • Refresh ICP competitive threat assessment
  • Add/remove companies from tracking list

Win/Loss Analysis

This is the highest-signal competitive data you have. Most companies do it too rarely.

When to interview:

  • Every lost deal >$50K ACV
  • Every churn >6 months tenure
  • Every competitive win (learn why — it may not be what you think)

Who conducts it:

  • NOT the AE who worked the deal (too close, prospect won't be candid)
  • Customer success, product team, or external researcher

Question structure:

  1. "Walk me through your evaluation process"
  2. "Who else were you considering?"
  3. "What were the top 3 criteria in your decision?"
  4. "Where did [our product] fall short?"
  5. "What was the deciding factor?"
  6. "What would have changed your decision?"

Aggregate findings monthly:

  • Win reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Loss reasons (rank by frequency)
  • Competitor win rates (by competitor, by segment)
  • Patterns over time

The Balance: Intelligence Without Obsession

Signs you're over-tracking competitors:

  • Roadmap decisions are primarily driven by "they just shipped X"
  • Team morale drops when competitors fundraise
  • You're shipping features you don't believe in to match their checklist
  • Pricing discussions always start with "well, they charge X"

Signs you're under-tracking:

  • Your AEs get blindsided on calls
  • Prospects know more about competitors than your team does
  • You missed a major product launch until customers told you
  • Your positioning hasn't changed in 12+ months despite market moves

The right posture:

  • Know competitors well enough to win against them
  • Don't let them set your agenda
  • Your roadmap is led by customer problems, informed by competitive gaps

Distributing Intelligence

AudienceFormatCadenceOwner
AEs + SDRsUpdated battlecards in CRMMonthly + triggeredCRO
ProductFeature gap analysisQuarterlyCPO
MarketingPositioning briefQuarterlyCMO
Leadership1-page competitive summaryMonthlyCEO/COO
BoardCompetitive landscape slideQuarterlyCEO

One source of truth: All competitive intel lives in one place (Notion, Confluence, Salesforce). Avoid Slack-only distribution — it disappears.


Red Flags in Competitive Intelligence

SignalWhat it means
Competitor's win rate >50% in your core segmentFundamental positioning problem, not sales problem
Same objection from 5+ deals: "competitor has X"Feature gap that's real, not just optics
Competitor hired 10 engineers in your domainMajor product investment incoming
Competitor raised >$20M and targets your ICP12-month runway for them to compete hard
Prospects evaluate you to justify competitor decisionYou're the "check box" — fix perception or segment

Integration with C-Suite Roles

Intelligence TypeFeeds ToOutput Format
Product movesCPORoadmap input, feature gap analysis
Pricing changesCRO, CFOPricing response recommendations
Funding roundsCEO, CFOStrategic positioning update
Hiring signalsCHRO, CTOTalent market intelligence
Customer wins/lossesCRO, CMOBattlecard updates, positioning shifts
Marketing campaignsCMOCounter-positioning, channel intelligence

References

  • references/ci-playbook.md — OSINT sources, win/loss framework, positioning map construction
  • templates/battlecard-template.md — sales battlecard template

来源与署名

来源:alirezarezvani/claude-skills位于c-level-advisor/skills/competitive-intel提交19392f7

许可证: MIT

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架