Diff Intake

作者 amplitude96fc7d4c58bb无许可证42 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库今天更新

Reads a PR or branch diff and produces a structured YAML change brief for downstream analytics instrumentation skills. Use this as the first step whenever a user shares a PR link, branch comparison, or raw diff and wants to understand what changed, what needs tracking, or how to instrument a feature. Trigger on phrases like "review this PR", "what changed in this branch", "help me instrument this diff", "check analytics coverage for this change", or any request to start the analytics review workflow.

AI 生成的概览

读取 PR 或分支差异,生成用于分析埋点的结构化 YAML 变更简报。

功能
该技能检查拉取请求或分支比较,对变更文件进行分类,并阅读核心逻辑文件的差异。它会提炼面向用户的变化和涉及的交互界面,判定整体变更类型与分析范围,并输出一份机器可读的 YAML 变更简报。它被定位为分析埋点工作流的第一步,供下游的事件发现与埋点技能使用。
适用场景
当用户提供 PR 链接、分支比较或原始差异,并想了解改了什么、需要跟踪什么或如何为某功能埋点时使用。适用于审查 PR、检查某次变更的分析覆盖情况,或启动分析审查工作流等请求。
运行要求
需要访问代码仓库及其历史记录,以及 GitHub CLI(gh)用于基于 PR 的输入,或 git 用于分支比较。获取 PR 时可能需要托管服务的身份验证。该技能不附带脚本,仅为指令。

diff-intake

Follow this skill step by step. You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and precise — no prose around the YAML block.

Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize

Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.

Fetching changes

  • PR URL gh pr view <number-or-url> gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"'
  • Branch comparison git log <main|master>..<branch> git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch>
  • Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.

Categorize files

Assign each file to a category based on its path:

  • Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
  • Generated: anything with generated in its path
  • Testing: test files
  • Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
  • Documentation: READMEs, docs/
  • Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations

For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).

Step 2: Build the file summary map

Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map. Only process and include Core Logic files.

Fetching detailed diffs

  • PR gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOid Using the response, get a detailed diff git diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
  • Branch comparison git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>

For each file, record

  • summary — 2-line summary of what changed
  • stack — frontend, backend, or shared

Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces

While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level signals that downstream event discovery needs:

  • user_facing_changes — a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do, see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.
  • surfaces.components — the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.

For each surface, record:

  • name — component, route, page, hook, or surface name
  • file — repo-relative path
  • change — added, modified, or deleted

If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit surfaces.components rather than inventing one.

Step 3: Classify the overall change

Infer the change type and analytics scope:

TypeAnalytics implication
featHigh — new surfaces likely need tracking
fixLow–Medium — may affect existing event conditions
refactorLow — tracking paths may move, regression risk
perfLow — usually no tracking impact
revertMedium — need to check what tracking was lost
style / docs / test / build / ci / choreNone — skip analytics analysis

analytics_scope = highest implication present:

  • none — only no-impact types
  • low — only perf/refactor
  • medium — fix
  • high — any feature or capability addition

If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.

Step 4: Emit the YAML brief

Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly. List each file individually in file_summary_map (no globs).

yaml
change_brief:  classification:    primary: feat           # dominant conventional commit type    types: [feat, fix]      # all types detected    analytics_scope: high   # none | low | medium | high    stack: frontend         # frontend | backend | fullstack  summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"  user_facing_changes:    - "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."  surfaces:    components:      - name: "AvatarUpload"        file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"        change: modified  file_summary_map:         # each entry includes a layer field    - file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"      summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"      layer: frontend       # frontend | backend | shared    - file: "src/api/upload.ts"      summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"      layer: backend

来源与署名

来源:amplitude/mcp-marketplace位于plugins/amplitude/skills/diff-intake提交96fc7d4

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架