Policy Drafting

anthropics/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/skills/policy-drafting

作者 anthropics4a6c651889c97cc9140580363c73e0eb17379c2b无许可证9.6K 个星标收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日仓库9天前更新

Draft an employment policy with state supplements where law differs across the jurisdictional footprint. Use when the user says "draft a [topic] policy", "we need a policy on", "update our [topic] policy", or names a policy gap.

精选仅含说明Business & Finance
AI 生成的概览

起草雇佣政策,并在法律因司法辖区不同而有差异时生成各州补充条款。

功能
先界定政策主题,再逐一检查配置的司法辖区范围内各辖区是否有针对该主题的专门规定,并起草一份适用于所有地区的核心政策。随后仅在规则不同的辖区添加州补充条款,并对照现有员工手册检查冲突、过度承诺以及无意中构成合同的语言。产出包括核心政策、州补充条款,以及内部起草说明,涵盖辖区扫描、冲突、法律变动情况和复审周期。
适用场景
当用户要求起草远程办公、育儿假、带薪休假等主题的政策,指出政策空白,或需要为多州布局更新现有政策时使用。它是供律师审阅的起草辅助工具,不是可直接发布的政策。它只覆盖配置范围内的司法辖区,不负责批准或推行政策。
运行要求
无脚本,仅为指令。读取 ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/ 下的实践级配置文件(CLAUDE.md,以及可选的 matter 工作区);启用 matter 时,输出写入对应 matter 文件夹。

/policy-drafting

  1. Load ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md → jurisdictional footprint, handbook location.
  2. Use the workflow below.
  3. Draft core policy. Check each jurisdiction in footprint for required variants.
  4. Output: core policy + state supplements. Flag where law is currently shifting.

Matter context

Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /employment-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.


Purpose

A policy that's right for California may be wrong (or unnecessary) in Texas. This skill drafts a core policy and generates state supplements where the footprint requires different rules.

Load context

~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/employment-legal/CLAUDE.md → jurisdictional footprint, handbook location and format.

Workflow

Step 1: Scope the policy

  • What's the policy for? (Remote work, parental leave, social media, etc.)
  • Why now? (Legal requirement, incident, growth, gap noticed)
  • Who does it apply to? (All employees, certain roles, certain locations)

Step 2: Jurisdictional scan

For each state/country in the footprint, check: does this jurisdiction have a specific rule on this topic?

Common topics with jurisdictional variance:

TopicVariance
Paid leaveState mandates (CA, NY, CO, WA, etc.) with different accrual rates, uses, carryover
Parental leaveState programs layer on top of FMLA (CA PFL, NY PFL, etc.)
Meal and rest breaksCA is the outlier (penalty pay); most states minimal
Expense reimbursementCA requires; most states don't
Pay transparencyGrowing list of states requiring ranges in postings
Non-competesSee hiring-review skill — unenforceable in some states
Final payTiming varies widely

If the topic has no jurisdictional variance (dress code, say), skip this step.

Step 3: Draft the core policy

One policy. Applies everywhere. Clear and readable — employees should understand it without a lawyer.

Structure:

  • Purpose (one sentence — why this policy exists)
  • Scope (who it applies to)
  • The rule (what's required/permitted/prohibited)
  • Process (how to request, who approves, what happens if)
  • Questions (who to ask)

Avoid: "heretofore," "notwithstanding," nested exceptions. This is a handbook policy, not a contract.

Step 4: State supplements

For each jurisdiction where the rule differs, a supplement:

markdown
### [State] Supplement
Employees working in [State] are subject to the following in addition to / instead of the core policy:
- [Specific difference]- [Cite the state law if helpful]

Keep supplements tight. Only what's different — don't repeat the core.

Step 5: Cross-check

  • Does this policy conflict with anything already in the handbook?
  • Does it promise more than the company intends to deliver? (A policy is a promise — courts hold employers to handbook promises.)
  • Does it inadvertently create a contract? (Some states treat handbook policies as contractual — include the standard "this is not a contract" language if the handbook doesn't already.)

Output

markdown
# [Policy Name]
## Core Policy
[Full text]
## State Supplements
### [State 1][Supplement]
### [State 2][Supplement]
---
## Drafting Notes (internal — remove before handbook insertion)
- **Jurisdictional scan:** [which states checked, which have variance]- **Conflicts with existing handbook:** [none | list]- **Law currently shifting:** [any state where this is in flux]- **Review cadence:** [when to revisit — annual, or when X happens]

Draft, not a policy in effect. This is a drafting aid for attorney review, not a policy you can publish. Publishing a handbook policy has legal consequences — in several states it can bind the company as a contractual promise, and wage/leave/accommodation policies are routinely read against the employer. A licensed attorney, solicitor, barrister, or other authorised legal professional in your jurisdiction reviews, edits as needed, and takes professional responsibility before the policy is rolled out. Do not publish or distribute this draft unreviewed.

Handoff

To handbook-updates skill: when this policy is approved, it diffs against the current handbook and flags what changes.

What this skill does not do

  • Approve the policy. It drafts; a human approves.
  • Roll out the policy. Communication to employees is an HR workflow.
  • Cover every jurisdiction on earth — only the ones in the footprint. If the footprint expands, re-run.

来源与署名

来源:anthropics/claude-for-legal位于employment-legal/skills/policy-drafting提交4a6c651

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架