W Review

blockmatic/basilic-skills/skills/workflow/w-review

作者 blockmatic7e05e2abd052dc6b526e8a28e36d102d42bfd635无许可证1 个星标收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日仓库7天前更新

Review a change for evidenced defects and risks without editing it.

AI 生成的概览

以只读方式审查代码变更,用证据验证疑似缺陷并按影响排序报告发现。

功能
针对指定的 diff、分支、拉取请求或工作树,结合其预期行为进行审查;除非同时要求修复,否则保持只读。它会阅读测试以了解哪些主张确实被覆盖,检查范围内的审查维度(行为变更时包括文档/README),并可启动 2–3 个只读探索者分别承担这些维度。疑似缺陷必须通过具体执行路径、失败用例或源码证据加以验证,发现按影响排序,并附文件/行号、触发条件、后果和最小有效修复建议。
适用场景
适用于代码变更在合并前需要审查以发现有证据支持的缺陷和风险时。也适合审查者应保持只读、质疑验证声明而非批准变更的场景。
运行要求
仅为指令,不附带脚本。需要能够访问被审查的变更(diff、分支、PR 或工作树)、其测试,以及所引用的 references/review-dimensions.md 文件。

Use the specified diff, branch, PR, or working tree and its intended behavior. Remain read-only unless fixes are also requested.

  1. Understand the trigger and expected result before judging the implementation. Read tests to learn which claims are actually exercised.
  2. Check the in-scope review dimensions [blocked], including docs/README when behavior changed. Spawn 2–3 read-only explorers that split those dimensions. Concentrate on changed behavior, callers, and failure paths. Skip dimensions that are out of scope and say so.
  3. Validate suspected defects with a concrete execution path, failing case, or source evidence. Do not invent timings or vulnerabilities from appearances.
  4. Challenge verification claims. Order findings by impact with file/line, trigger, consequence, and smallest useful remedy. An inspection is not proof that tests passed and is not approval to merge.

来源与署名

来源:blockmatic/basilic-skills位于skills/workflow/w-review提交7e05e2a

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架