Build Fix

codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/skills/build-fix

作者 codewithmukesh23300897f4d1无许可证754 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库2个月前更新

Autonomous iteration loops for .NET: drive a broken build or failing test suite to green with bounded iterations, progress detection, and fail-safe guards that prevent infinite retries and wasted tokens. The build-fix loop (dotnet build, parse, categorize, fix, rebuild) is the primary flow; the test-fix loop is a first-class variant. Invoke when the build is broken, after a major refactor or dependency update, or when the user says "fix the build", "build is broken", "make it compile", "make the tests pass", "fix failing tests", "keep going until it works", "autonomous", "loop", "auto-fix", or "keep fixing".

AI 生成的概览

通过有界且带防护的迭代循环,让损坏的 .NET 构建和失败的测试套件恢复通过。

功能
该技能为 .NET 项目定义了一套自主迭代循环:运行 dotnet build、解析编译错误、按根本原因归类、应用针对性修复并重新构建,直到构建通过或触发防护机制。测试修复变体运行 dotnet test --no-build,在改动前先诊断每个失败,并禁止削弱断言。它强制限定迭代次数、检测进展、保证原子性,并在卡住、回归、级联失败或严重错误时安全退出,每次迭代都报告进展。
适用场景
适用于 .NET 构建损坏且存在多个编译错误、代码改动或重构或 NuGet 升级后测试失败,以及合并或脚手架生成后尚未编译通过的情况。也适用于用户提出修复构建、让它编译通过或让测试通过等请求。
运行要求
需要带 dotnet CLI 的 .NET SDK(dotnet build、dotnet test),并能访问项目或解决方案。它引用可选的 MCP 工具用于诊断、符号查找、引用分析和项目依赖图,并涉及相关技能与 dotnet-architect 代理。不附带脚本,仅为指令。

/build-fix

What

The kit's autonomous iteration-loop skill. It drives a broken dotnet build (or failing dotnet test) to green by looping: run, parse failures, categorize by root cause, apply targeted fixes, re-run. It repeats until green or a guard fires — the same way an experienced developer works through a wall of red, but with hard limits that stop it from thrashing.

This is not a single-pass fix. It handles cascading errors where fixing one issue reveals the next.

When

  • The build is broken and there are multiple compiler errors
  • Tests are failing after code changes or a build-fix pass
  • After a major refactor that touched type names, namespaces, or signatures
  • After updating NuGet packages (especially major version bumps)
  • After merging a branch with conflicts resolved but not compiled
  • After scaffolding or code generation that needs manual adjustments
  • User says: "fix the build", "make it compile", "make the tests pass", "keep going until it works", "keep fixing"

How

Loop Discipline (applies to every loop)

  1. Bounded iteration, always — Default max 5 iterations, hard cap 10 (user "keep going" extends by 3, never past 10). If 5 iterations cannot solve it, the problem needs human judgment, not a 6th identical attempt.
  2. Progress or exit — Each iteration must reduce the error/failure count. Same errors after a fix attempt = STUCK: stop, report, and re-plan with a different approach. Never retry the same fix that already failed.
  3. Categorize before fixing — Group errors by root cause and fix the highest-leverage first (one missing using can erase a dozen downstream errors).
  4. Transparency per iteration — Report what changed and why: Iteration 3/5: fixed CS0246 by adding using System.Text.Json, 2 remain. Never modify files silently.
  5. Atomicity — Each iteration leaves the codebase no worse than before. If iteration 3 fails, the code stays in iteration 2's state.

Primary Flow: Build-Fix Loop (max 5 iterations)

  1. Build — Run dotnet build, capture full error output

  2. Parse — Extract every error CS#### with file, line, and message

  3. Categorize — Group by root cause:

    CategoryCodesFix strategy
    Missing using/referenceCS0246, CS0234Add using, package, or project ref
    Type mismatchCS0029, CS1503Check expected type, cast or convert
    API changeCS0117, CS7036Check new signature, update call sites
    NullabilityCS8600–CS8604Add null check, ?. or ??
    Ambiguity / duplicateCS0104, CS0121, CS0111Qualify namespace, remove dupe
    Missing memberCS1061Check spelling, verify member exists
    Missing implementationCS0535Implement interface/abstract members
    Obsolete APICS0618Replace with recommended alternative
  4. Fix — Apply targeted fixes, root-cause/highest-leverage errors first

  5. Rebuild — Run dotnet build again, compare error count

  6. Evaluate — Zero errors: run dotnet test as a sanity check, report success. Fewer errors: continue. Same errors: STUCK — exit and re-plan. More errors: revert the iteration, report REGRESSION.

Variant: Test-Fix Loop (max 5; 3 if it follows a build-fix pass)

Same loop, same guards, with dotnet test --no-build as the runner and one critical extra step — diagnose before fixing:

  1. Read the test — understand the assertion and setup
  2. Read the production code — understand the actual behavior
  3. Decide where the bug lives: wrong expectation → fix the test; production bug → fix the code; incomplete setup → fix the setup; contract changed → update the test to match
  4. Never weaken an assertion to make a test pass. BAD: Assert.Equal(expected, actual) → Assert.NotNull(actual). GOOD: fix the production code so the original assertion passes.

Fail-Safe Guards (immediate exit)

  • STUCK — same errors/failures after a fix, or count oscillates (3 → 2 → 3): report what could not be fixed and what a human should check
  • REGRESSION — an iteration introduced more errors than it fixed: revert its changes, report
  • Cascading failures — fixing one error spawns 3+ new ones twice in a row: the approach is wrong, stop
  • Critical error — wrong SDK, missing project file, corrupted solution, or the test runner itself fails: human intervention needed, stop
  • User interruption — finish the current iteration, report progress, ask how to proceed

Other Loops

The same discipline — bounded iterations, progress detection, fail-safe guards — governs refactor passes (/de-sloppify: verify build + tests after each target, revert on failure) and scaffolding (/scaffold: generate, then run nested build-fix and test-fix loops). Nested loops get a smaller budget (parent 5 → nested 3), max nesting depth 2, total budget 15.

Invokes

TypeNamePurpose
Skillinstinct-systemCapture fix patterns in MEMORY.md
Agentdotnet-architectConsulted for architectural error patterns

MCP Tools Used

  • get_diagnostics — Compiler errors/warnings scoped to file or project
  • find_symbol — Locate moved or renamed types
  • find_references — Assess blast radius of a broken API change
  • get_project_graph — Dependency order for fixing reference errors

Example

User: /build-fix
Claude: Running dotnet build...  Found 12 errors across 4 files.
  Iteration 1/5:  - 6 errors: Missing namespace (CS0246) — adding using directives  - 3 errors: Type mismatch (CS1503) — updating method signatures  - 3 errors: Interface not implemented (CS0738) — package API changed
  Rebuilding... 3 errors remaining.
  Iteration 2/5:  - 3 errors: CS0738 after xunit.v3 upgrade    - IAsyncLifetime.InitializeAsync now returns ValueTask (was Task in v2),      and DisposeAsync comes from IAsyncDisposable    - Updating 3 test fixtures to the ValueTask signatures
  Rebuilding... 0 errors. Build is green.
  Running dotnet test... All 47 tests passed.  Added to Memory > Packages: "xunit.v3 IAsyncLifetime uses ValueTask signatures"

Related

  • /verify — Full verification pass (build + test + format + diagnostics)
  • /tdd — Red-green-refactor when building new features test-first
  • /de-sloppify — Clean up code quality issues after the build is green

来源与署名

来源:codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit位于skills/build-fix提交2330089

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架

更多来自 codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit 的技能

Wrap Up

codewithmukesh

在会话结束时把已完成工作、待办任务与经验写入交接文件,并在会话开始时重新载入。

Productivity & Workflow7542个月前更新

Workflow Mastery

codewithmukesh

Claude Code workflow mastery for .NET developers. Covers parallel execution with git worktrees, plan mode strategy, verification loops, auto-formatting hooks, permission setup for dotnet CLI, prompting techniques, subagent patterns, and context discipline — token budget management, MCP-first navigation, lazy loading, and subagent isolation — all adapted for the .NET ecosystem. Load this skill when setting up Claude Code for a .NET project, optimizing workflows, running parallel sessions, when context is running low or sessions feel sluggish, when exploring a large codebase efficiently, or when the user mentions "productivity", "workflow", "parallel", "worktree", "plan mode", "permissions", "hooks", "10x", "setup Claude Code", "speed up development", "context", "tokens", "budget", "running out of context", "too many files", or "large codebase". Inspired by tips from Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code) and the Anthropic team.

待分类7542个月前更新

Vertical Slice

codewithmukesh

指导 .NET 开发者采用垂直切片架构组织应用,涵盖功能文件夹、端点分组与处理程序模式。

Software Development7542个月前更新

Testing

codewithmukesh

Testing strategy for .NET 10 applications. Covers xUnit v3, WebApplicationFactory for integration tests, Testcontainers for real database testing, Verify for snapshot testing, and the AAA pattern. Load this skill when writing tests, setting up test infrastructure, reviewing test coverage, or when the user mentions "test", "xUnit", "WebApplicationFactory", "Testcontainers", "integration test", "unit test", "bUnit", "snapshot test", "Verify", "test coverage", "AAA pattern", "WireMock", or "FakeTimeProvider".

待分类7542个月前更新

Tdd

codewithmukesh

Guided test-driven development workflow for .NET 10 using xUnit v3, WebApplicationFactory, Testcontainers, and Verify snapshots. Follows the strict red-green-refactor cycle. Use when: "TDD", "test-driven", "let's TDD this", "red green refactor", "write the test first", or when building a feature with clear acceptance criteria.

待分类7542个月前更新

Spec

codewithmukesh

通过结构化提问,把模糊的功能想法转化为双方确认并持久化的规格说明文件。

Productivity & Workflow7542个月前更新