Simple Issue Description

作者 every-app89e5a00717cd无许可证22K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库今天更新

Turn a rough bug report, feature request, support note, or pull request into a short, plain-language issue focused on the problem and desired behavior. Use when a contributor asks to simplify an issue, explain what a PR is for, create the corresponding issue for a PR, remove implementation detail from a report, or invokes /simple-issue-description.

AI 生成的概览

把粗略的缺陷报告、功能请求或拉取请求改写成简短、通俗的问题描述。

功能
该技能把粗略笔记、支持消息、问题文本、PR 描述或差异改写成聚焦于实际现象和期望行为的简短问题。它产出简短的 Markdown 问题,包含标题、TL;DR、当前行为、期望行为以及可选的额外上下文,正文通常控制在约 200 词以内。对于混杂的多个问题,它会先起草最主要的一个并逐条列出其余问题;若来源只显示重构或清理,则不会强行生成问题。
适用场景
当贡献者想要简化问题、说明拉取请求的目的、为 PR 创建对应问题,或从报告中去除实现细节时使用。在调用 /simple-issue-description 时同样适用。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具,仅为指令。它基于提供的笔记、对话、问题、PR 描述或差异工作,并可能查看 PR 中的规格、设计文档或 README 变更。

Simple Issue Description

Write an issue a maintainer can understand in under a minute. Focus on what someone experiences and what should happen instead.

Workflow

  1. Read the supplied notes, conversation, issue, PR description, or diff. In a PR, also check for spec, design doc, or README changes — they often state the intent better than the description does.
  2. Identify the concrete problem. State who or what is affected when the source makes that clear.
  3. Describe the desired behavior without prescribing an implementation.
  4. Keep only context that helps someone understand or reproduce the problem.
  5. If the source is a PR or diff, describe the problem the change tries to solve, not the files or code it changes.
  6. Draft the issue immediately unless the problem and desired behavior cannot be determined. In that case, ask one short clarifying question.

One issue per problem. If the source bundles unrelated problems, draft the issue for the most significant one, list the others in a line each, and tell the contributor to split them into separate issues and separate pull requests.

If the source adds a capability instead of fixing a misbehavior, do not stage the absence as a bug. Describe what a user cannot do today and the full user experience of the feature: who uses it, from where, and what they see.

Do not invent user impact, reproduction steps, or certainty that the source does not support. If the source only shows cleanup, refactoring, or a possible code smell, say that no concrete problem is clear instead of manufacturing an issue — this rule wins over step 6. Reply with two or three sentences: what the source shows, and what evidence would make it issue-worthy.

If the source fixes a security weakness that is not already public, do not draft a public issue describing it. Suggest reporting it privately to the maintainer instead.

Writing rules

  • Use plain language and short sentences.
  • Keep the issue under 200 words unless it is clear that more is necessary to describe the reproduction steps or a large feature.
  • Lead with behavior, not code, architecture, or the proposed fix. A one-sentence plain-language cause is fine when the symptom cannot be understood without it.
  • Keep technical details only when they are necessary to reproduce or understand the problem. Limits and defaults that make the symptom make sense (batch sizes, quotas, caps) count as necessary.
  • Preserve useful evidence such as error messages, screenshots, links, and documentation references.
  • Do not mention that AI wrote or reviewed the issue.
  • Avoid filler, praise, roadmap language, and exhaustive edge cases.
  • Use the contributor's level of certainty. Do not present a guess as a confirmed bug; write "can" or "appears to" when the source describes a risk rather than an observed failure.

Output format

The first line is the issue title — when filing on GitHub, put it in the title field instead of repeating it in the body. For a missing capability, title the outcome ("Flag pages with no structured data") rather than a fake bug ("Audits never mention structured data").

Omit the Extra context section when there is nothing useful to add. Constraints and scope notes belong there, including what is not affected when a maintainer would reasonably worry that it is.

markdown
# <Short title describing the problem or desired outcome>
## TL;DR
<In one or two sentences, explain what happens now and what should happen instead.>
## What is happening?
<Describe the current behavior in plain language. Include a concrete example when available.>
## What should happen?
<Describe the desired behavior without proposing how to build it.>
## Extra context
<Optional reproduction steps, error text, screenshots, links, or constraints.>

Example

markdown
# The chat jumps away from messages I am reading
## TL;DR
When I scroll up to read an older message, a new response moves me back to the bottom of the chat. The chat should stay where I left it until I choose to return to the latest message.
## What is happening?
New responses automatically scroll the chat to the bottom, even when I am reading earlier messages.
## What should happen?
Keep my current scroll position and show that a new message is available.

来源与署名

来源:every-app/open-seo位于.agents/skills/simple-issue-description提交89e5a00

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架