Convex Advisor

作者 get-convex2cfe645c87f9无许可证63 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库6天前更新

Read the Convex deployment's 72h insights (read limits, OCC contention), root-cause each event in code, report evidence-backed perf/cost findings with fixes.

AI 生成的概览

读取 Convex 部署的 72 小时洞察,并给出有证据支持、附带代码级修复建议的性能与成本发现。

功能
该技能通过官方 Convex MCP 检查 Convex 部署的 72 小时健康洞察,收集读取上限命中、读取阈值和 OCC 写入争用等类型化事件。随后它阅读被标记函数的代码,对每个事件进行根因分析,例如未使用索引的 collect 或读改写热点。它按 findings 总线格式输出发现,包含严重级别、位置、原始证据和建议修复,并按严重程度排序报告。整个过程只读,不会修改任何部署。
适用场景
当 Convex 云端 dev 或 prod 部署已积累一定流量,且你希望基于运行时证据而非静态审查做一次健康、性能或成本检查时使用。它适合诊断读取上限或 OCC 争用事件并给出可执行的修复方案。它不处理授权、代码风格或错误分诊,这些会转交其他能力。
运行要求
需要官方 Convex MCP 及其 status、insights、tables 和 functionSpec 工具,需要以登录用户身份访问云端 dev 或 prod 部署(预览环境或仅限部署密钥的场景不可用),并需要约 72 小时的流量数据才能使洞察有意义。该技能不附带脚本,仅为指令。
<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/convex-advisor.json — do not edit by hand. -->

Live-deployment advisor

Static review guesses; the deployment KNOWS. The official Convex MCP ships an insights tool with typed 72h health events per function — documentsReadLimit / bytesReadLimit (hard limit hits), documentsReadThreshold / bytesReadThreshold (approaching), occFailedPermanently / occRetried (write contention) — each carrying evidence (table_name, bytes_read, documents_read, occ document id + retry count). The advisor turns each event into a root-caused finding by reading the flagged function's actual code, and emits findings on the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json) so fixers can be dispatched and launch-readiness can score.

Workflow

  1. GUARD: run deploy-guard step 0-1 — identify + announce the deployment being read. Reading insights/logs on prod is allowed read-only; never enable mutating prod access for an advisory pass.
  2. GATHER (deterministic, via the official Convex MCP): status → deployment selector; insights → the typed 72h events; tables → schema + row counts; functionSpec → the public/internal surface. The insights tool is only available on cloud dev/prod deployments when logged in as a user (not on previews or deploy-key-scoped contexts) and needs ~72h of traffic; if it returns nothing or is unavailable, say so and fall back to offering convex-reviewer — do NOT invent findings.
  3. ROOT-CAUSE each insight event by reading the flagged function's code:
    • bytesReadThreshold/Limit or documentsReadThreshold/Limit → look for .collect() / unindexed .filter() / missing pagination on the named table; the fix is an index + .withIndex, .take(n), or .paginate (convex-expert patterns), or an aggregate component for counting shapes.
    • occRetried / occFailedPermanently → look for read-modify-write hotspots on the named document (shared counters, status toggles); the fix is @convex-dev/sharded-counter, narrowing the read set, or moving contention to a workpool.
    • repeated failures in logs (status: failure) → classify: crash loop in a cron, validator rejections, unhandled error shapes.
  4. EMIT findings per specs/finding.schema.json: class perf/correctness/cost, severity from the insight kind (limit hits = high, thresholds = med, retried = med, permanent OCC failure = high), locus {kind: deployment, functionId, tableName}, evidence {kind: insight-event, detail: the raw event}, confidence: confirmed (the event happened — it is not a hypothesis), fixCapability + autofixable where the repair is mechanical.
  5. REPORT: findings ranked by severity, each with (a) the runtime evidence in one line ('messages:list read 4.2MB from messages 31× yesterday'), (b) the code-level root cause with file:line, (c) the concrete fix and which capability applies it. Offer to apply fixes; apply only on confirmation, then re-run insights after traffic to verify the trend, or re-run the static check immediately.
  6. Scope discipline: this is a health/perf/cost pass. Route authz findings to convex-authz, code-idiom findings to convex-reviewer, error triage to sentinel — emit a pointer finding rather than duplicating their work.

Rules

  • Evidence-not-vibes: every finding cites a real insight event, log line, or table stat — if the deployment has no evidence, the advisor has no findings (offer convex-reviewer instead).
  • Read-only by construction: an advisory pass never mutates any deployment and never enables prod mutation flags (deploy-guard discipline applies).
  • Root-cause in the code before reporting: an insight event names the symptom; the finding must name the line and the mechanism.
  • Emit on the findings bus (specs/finding.schema.json), confidence: confirmed — runtime events are facts, not hypotheses.
  • Severity from the event kind: limit-hit / permanent-OCC-failure = high; threshold / retried = med.
  • Stay in lane: perf/cost/health only — hand authz to convex-authz, style to convex-reviewer, error triage to sentinel.
  • Prefer component fixes over hand-rolls when they match (sharded-counter for OCC on counters, aggregate for count scans) — same bias as suggest.

来源与署名

来源:get-convex/agent-skills位于skills/convex-advisor提交2cfe645

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架