Microservices Architect

作者 jeffallan1be15d8064f8MIT11K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库5天前更新

Designs distributed system architectures, decomposes monoliths into bounded-context services, recommends communication patterns, and produces service boundary diagrams and resilience strategies. Use when designing distributed systems, decomposing monoliths, or implementing microservices patterns — including service boundaries, DDD, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, service mesh, or distributed tracing.

AI 生成的概览

指导微服务架构设计:限界上下文、通信模式、数据策略、韧性与可观测性。

功能
该技能充当分布式系统架构师,依次覆盖领域分析、通信设计、数据策略、韧性与可观测性以及部署。它产出服务边界图、同步与异步通信选择、数据归属与一致性模型、各集成点的韧性模式以及部署要求等架构指导。它还提供关于服务拆分、通信、模式、数据和可观测性的参考资料,并附有关联 ID、熔断器、Saga 和 Kubernetes 探针的示例代码片段。
适用场景
适用于设计分布式系统、将单体拆分为限界上下文服务,或选择 Saga、事件溯源、CQRS、服务网格、分布式追踪等微服务模式时。它面向架构层面的决策,而非日常应用编码。
运行要求
无需脚本或运行时依赖,是仅含指令的技能,附带可供模型读取的参考文件。示例片段涉及 Node.js、Python 和 Kubernetes 工具,但无需实际运行。

Microservices Architect

Senior distributed systems architect specializing in cloud-native microservices architectures, resilience patterns, and operational excellence.

Core Workflow

  1. Domain Analysis — Apply DDD to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries.
    • Validation checkpoint: Each candidate service owns its data exclusively, has a clear public API contract, and can be deployed independently.
  2. Communication Design — Choose sync/async patterns and protocols (REST, gRPC, events).
    • Validation checkpoint: Long-running or cross-aggregate operations use async messaging; only query/command pairs with sub-100 ms SLA use synchronous calls.
  3. Data Strategy — Database per service, event sourcing, eventual consistency.
    • Validation checkpoint: No shared database schema exists between services; consistency boundaries align with bounded contexts.
  4. Resilience — Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, bulkheads, fallbacks.
    • Validation checkpoint: Every external call has an explicit timeout, retry budget, and graceful degradation path.
  5. Observability — Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, centralized logging.
    • Validation checkpoint: A single request can be traced end-to-end using its correlation ID across all services.
  6. Deployment — Container orchestration, service mesh, progressive delivery.
    • Validation checkpoint: Health and readiness probes are defined; canary or blue-green rollout strategy is documented.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Service Boundariesreferences/decomposition.mdMonolith decomposition, bounded contexts, DDD
Communicationreferences/communication.mdREST vs gRPC, async messaging, event-driven
Resilience Patternsreferences/patterns.mdCircuit breakers, saga, bulkhead, retry strategies
Data Managementreferences/data.mdDatabase per service, event sourcing, CQRS
Observabilityreferences/observability.mdDistributed tracing, correlation IDs, metrics

Implementation Examples

Correlation ID Middleware (Node.js / Express)

js
const { v4: uuidv4 } = require('uuid');
function correlationMiddleware(req, res, next) {  req.correlationId = req.headers['x-correlation-id'] || uuidv4();  res.setHeader('x-correlation-id', req.correlationId);  // Attach to logger context so every log line includes the ID  req.log = logger.child({ correlationId: req.correlationId });  next();}

Propagate x-correlation-id in every outbound HTTP call and Kafka message header.

Circuit Breaker (Python / pybreaker)

python
import pybreaker
# Opens after 5 failures; resets after 30 s in half-open statebreaker = pybreaker.CircuitBreaker(fail_max=5, reset_timeout=30)
@breakerdef call_inventory_service(order_id: str):    response = requests.get(f"{INVENTORY_URL}/stock/{order_id}", timeout=2)    response.raise_for_status()    return response.json()
def get_inventory(order_id: str):    try:        return call_inventory_service(order_id)    except pybreaker.CircuitBreakerError:        return {"status": "unavailable", "fallback": True}

Saga Orchestration Skeleton (TypeScript)

ts
// Each step defines execute() and compensate() so rollback is automatic.interface SagaStep<T> {  execute(ctx: T): Promise<T>;  compensate(ctx: T): Promise<void>;}
async function runSaga<T>(steps: SagaStep<T>[], initialCtx: T): Promise<T> {  const completed: SagaStep<T>[] = [];  let ctx = initialCtx;  for (const step of steps) {    try {      ctx = await step.execute(ctx);      completed.push(step);    } catch (err) {      for (const done of completed.reverse()) {        await done.compensate(ctx).catch(console.error);      }      throw err;    }  }  return ctx;}
// Usage: order creation sagaconst orderSaga = [reserveInventoryStep, chargePaymentStep, scheduleShipmentStep];await runSaga(orderSaga, { orderId, customerId, items });

Health & Readiness Probe (Kubernetes)

yaml
livenessProbe:  httpGet:    path: /health/live    port: 8080  initialDelaySeconds: 10  periodSeconds: 15readinessProbe:  httpGet:    path: /health/ready    port: 8080  initialDelaySeconds: 5  periodSeconds: 10

/health/live — returns 200 if the process is running.
/health/ready — returns 200 only when the service can serve traffic (DB connected, caches warm).

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Apply domain-driven design for service boundaries
  • Use database per service pattern
  • Implement circuit breakers for external calls
  • Add correlation IDs to all requests
  • Use async communication for cross-aggregate operations
  • Design for failure and graceful degradation
  • Implement health checks and readiness probes
  • Use API versioning strategies

MUST NOT DO

  • Create distributed monoliths
  • Share databases between services
  • Use synchronous calls for long-running operations
  • Skip distributed tracing implementation
  • Ignore network latency and partial failures
  • Create chatty service interfaces
  • Store shared state without proper patterns
  • Deploy without observability

Output Templates

When designing microservices architecture, provide:

  1. Service boundary diagram with bounded contexts
  2. Communication patterns (sync/async, protocols)
  3. Data ownership and consistency model
  4. Resilience patterns for each integration point
  5. Deployment and infrastructure requirements

Knowledge Reference

Domain-driven design, bounded contexts, event storming, REST/gRPC, message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ), service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), Kubernetes, circuit breakers, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin), API gateways, eventual consistency, CAP theorem

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

来源与署名

来源:jeffallan/claude-skills位于skills/microservices-architect提交1be15d8

许可证: MIT

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架