Dedash

LilMGenius/paperthin/skills/depth/dedash

作者 LilMGenius7d5dc6235990230e45a24a25c527d81701da5458无许可证收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日

Remove em-dashes and the dashes standing in for them from a user-owned scope, reading each occurrence in context and choosing the punctuation or wording that fits.

仅含说明Writing & Content
AI 生成的概览

在用户指定的范围内移除破折号及其替代符号,并按语法作用逐处选择替换标点。

功能
该技能在用户指定的范围内查找起破折号作用的符号,范围可以是段落、字段、文件、选区或目录树。它按语法作用逐处替换,使用逗号、括号、冒号、句号、分号或小幅改写,并保留连字符、范围号、负号、代码及有意使用的符号。随后它会重读改动后的句子,修正节奏和标点问题,并报告检查范围、数量、按作用分类的替换以及判断存疑之处。
适用场景
当文本中的破折号或类似符号需要删除或改用其他标点时使用。它适合编辑用户拥有并明确指定的段落、字段、文件、选区或目录树。它不用于整批字符替换,也不改动指定范围之外的标点。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具,仅为说明性技能。它要求用户明确指定范围,并在进行编辑时提到使用 PYTHONUTF8=1 进行 Unicode 安全编辑。

Remove em-dashes and the dashes standing in for them from the scope the user names, one occurrence at a time, while leaving hyphens, ranges, and deliberate marks alone.

Goal

Replace each em-dash that should not remain with the mark or wording its clause actually needs. Target any dash doing an em-dash's job, whatever its exact character: U+2014 and its longer or repurposed look-alikes all read the same on the page. The user owns the scope: a passage, field, file, selection, or tree. Do not widen it without asking.

Workflow

  1. FIND: Take the exact scope from the user and locate every dash doing an em-dash's job in it, judged by the role it plays in the sentence, not its codepoint: any mark that sets off an aside, an appositive, an abrupt turn, or a missing conjunction. The em-dash (U+2014) is the common one; the horizontal bar (U+2015) and the two- and three-em dashes (U+2E3A, U+2E3B) read the same and count. The en-dash (U+2013) is the boundary case: it counts when it joins clauses where an em-dash would fit, but stays when it spans a range's endpoints, numeric or not (1990–2020, the London–Paris route). A dash doing a non-em job (a hyphen, a minus, a range) stays. Surface anything genuinely ambiguous as a judgment call rather than changing it blindly.
  2. REPLACE per role: Choose per occurrence by grammatical role:
    • Parenthetical aside: commas or parentheses when the dashed material can be lifted out of the sentence.
    • Appositive: a colon or comma when the dashed material renames, defines, or expands the noun before it.
    • Abrupt turn: a full stop, semicolon, or comma when the dash marks a pivot, interruption, or restart.
    • False-conjunction break: rewrite the sentence when the dash stands in for a missing "and", "but", "because", "so", or another real connective.
  3. LEAVE-ALONE: Unless the user explicitly includes them and the context proves them wrong, leave untouched:
    • hyphenated compounds, minus signs, and negative numbers
    • ranges such as 1-10, 1–10, or London–Paris; a range dash is not an em-dash
    • code, diffs, command output, identifiers, serialized data, URLs, paths, anchors, and query strings
    • quoted or clearly deliberate em-dashes in stylized prose; these surface as judgment calls, never as blind mutations
  4. RE-READ: Read every changed sentence in place. Fix awkward rhythm, dangling punctuation, doubled spaces, and connector loss introduced by the replacement. If the sentence now needs wording instead of punctuation, rewrite the smallest clause that solves it.
  5. REPORT: State the scope checked, how many dashes were found and changed, which replacements were used by role, and anything left alone or surfaced as a judgment call.

Rules

  • Never do blanket replacement. The same glyph can require different punctuation in different clauses.
  • Never replace an em-dash with a hyphen as the cleanup.
  • Mutate with edit-safety: edit unicode-safe (PYTHONUTF8=1) and replace each dash per occurrence, never a blanket sweep; if the scope contains no such dash, report a MISS rather than changing nearby punctuation.
  • Preserve the user's voice. This skill removes a mark where requested; it does not flatten style outside the user-owned scope.

Verification

Before finishing, confirm:

  1. The scope stayed exactly user-owned.
  2. Every replacement was selected per occurrence by grammatical role.
  3. Leave-alone cases stayed untouched or were reported as judgment calls.
  4. The report includes counts and any judgment calls.

来源与署名

来源:LilMGenius/paperthin位于skills/depth/dedash提交7d5dc62

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架