Strategy And Competitive Analysis

lyndonkl/claude/skills/strategy-and-competitive-analysis

作者 lyndonkl4acc337d4dbdb19da6469eb2504c16669c1cafa1无许可证收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日

Develops business strategies grounded in rigorous competitive and market analysis using proven frameworks (Good Strategy kernel, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, Blue Ocean, Playing to Win, Value Chain Analysis, BCG Matrix). Use when developing strategy (market entry, product launch, expansion, M&A, turnaround), conducting competitive analysis, making strategic decisions (build vs buy, pricing, positioning), planning strategic initiatives, or when user mentions strategy, competitive analysis, Porter's 5 Forces, SWOT, market positioning, or strategic frameworks.

AI 生成的概览

使用波特五力、SWOT 和好战略内核等框架,指导商业战略制定与竞争分析。

功能
该技能提供结构化流程,用于界定战略问题、选择并应用商业框架,并将分析结果综合为战略。它涵盖好战略内核、波特五力、SWOT、蓝海战略、Playing to Win、价值链分析和 BCG 矩阵等框架,以及竞争对手画像和护城河分析。它产出战略文档,包含分析、诊断、指导方针、协调一致的行动,以及带有负责人、时间表和指标的行动计划。它还附带模板、方法参考和质量评分表用于自评。
适用场景
适用于市场进入、产品发布、扩张、并购或转型战略,也适用于竞争分析或自建与购买、定价、定位等战略决策。它也适合年度战略规划和产品组合管理。它面向商业战略工作,而非数值数据集分析。
运行要求
无脚本,仅为说明和参考文件。它依赖智能体以及随附的模板、方法和评分表资源,并需要业务背景、竞争格局信息和可用资源作为输入。

Strategy & Competitive Analysis

Table of Contents

Core approach -- Good Strategy Kernel (Rumelt): Diagnosis (what's the challenge) → Guiding Policy (overall approach) → Coherent Actions (specific coordinated steps).

Example: SaaS startup entering crowded market → Diagnosis: commoditized features, price competition, high CAC. Guiding Policy: vertical specialization (healthcare) + product-led growth. Coherent Actions: build HIPAA compliance, create compliance templates, offer free tier, invest in SEO for "healthcare SaaS".

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Strategy & Competitive Analysis Progress:- [ ] Step 1: Frame strategic question and gather context- [ ] Step 2: Choose framework(s) based on question type- [ ] Step 3: Conduct analysis using chosen framework(s)- [ ] Step 4: Synthesize insights and formulate strategy- [ ] Step 5: Validate and create action plan

Step 1: Frame strategic question

Clarify the strategic question, business context (industry, stage, constraints), competitive landscape, and success criteria. See Common Patterns for typical question types.

Step 2: Choose framework(s)

For industry/competitive structure → Use Porter's 5 Forces. For positioning → Use Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas or Value Chain Analysis. For overall strategy → Use Good Strategy kernel. For multiple options → Use SWOT per option. See Strategic Frameworks Overview and resources/methodology.md [blocked] for framework selection guidance.

Step 3: Conduct analysis

For straightforward competitive analysis → Use resources/template.md [blocked]. For complex multi-framework strategy → Study resources/methodology.md [blocked] for integrated approach. Gather data (competitor research, market analysis, customer insights), apply framework systematically, document findings with evidence.

Step 4: Synthesize insights

Apply Good Strategy kernel: Diagnosis (core challenge from analysis), Guiding Policy (overall approach to address challenge), Coherent Actions (3-5 specific coordinated steps). Ensure coherence (actions reinforce each other, support guiding policy, address diagnosis).

Step 5: Validate and create action plan

Self-assess using resources/evaluators/rubric_strategy_and_competitive_analysis.json [blocked]. Check: diagnosis grounded in evidence, guiding policy addresses root challenge, actions coherent and specific, competitive positioning clear, assumptions explicit, risks identified. Create strategy-and-competitive-analysis.md with strategy summary, supporting analysis, action plan with owners/timelines.

Strategic Frameworks Overview

FrameworkUse WhenKey Output
Good Strategy KernelOverall strategy formulationDiagnosis + Guiding Policy + Coherent Actions
Porter's 5 ForcesAssess industry attractiveness, competitive intensityIndustry structure analysis, profit potential
SWOT AnalysisEvaluate internal/external factors, compare optionsStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
Blue Ocean StrategyFind uncontested market space, redefine competitionStrategy canvas, value innovation
Playing to WinDefine strategic choices explicitlyWhere to play (markets/segments), How to win (advantage)
Value Chain AnalysisIdentify cost advantages, differentiation opportunitiesValue activities, cost drivers, linkages
BCG MatrixManage product portfolioStars, Cash Cows, Dogs, Question Marks
Competitive ProfilingUnderstand specific competitors deeplyCompetitor SWOT, positioning, strategy inference

Framework Selection:

  • Single product launch → Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas + Competitive Profiling
  • Market entry decision → Porter's 5 Forces + Playing to Win
  • Annual strategic planning → Good Strategy Kernel + SWOT
  • Turnaround/crisis → Good Strategy Kernel (diagnosis critical)
  • Portfolio management → BCG Matrix + Resource allocation

See resources/methodology.md [blocked] for detailed framework application guidance.

Competitive Analysis Overview

Competitor Profiling:

  • Identify competitors: Direct (same solution), Indirect (different solution, same job), Potential (adjacent markets, new entrants)
  • Profile each: Product/features, Pricing, Target customers, Positioning/messaging, Strengths/weaknesses, Strategy inference, Financial health, Recent moves
  • Analyze: SWOT per competitor, Competitive positioning map (2x2: price vs features, etc.), Share of wallet, Win/loss patterns

Porter's 5 Forces:

  1. Competitive Rivalry: Number of competitors, market growth rate, differentiation, switching costs, exit barriers
  2. Threat of New Entrants: Barriers to entry (capital, technology, brand, regulation, network effects)
  3. Threat of Substitutes: Alternative solutions, price-performance trade-offs, switching costs
  4. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Concentration, price sensitivity, switching costs, backward integration threat
  5. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Concentration, uniqueness, switching costs, forward integration threat

Output: Industry attractiveness (high/medium/low profit potential), key competitive dynamics, strategic implications.

Competitive Moats (sustainable advantages):

  • Network effects: Value increases with more users (platforms, marketplaces)
  • Switching costs: High cost to change providers (data lock-in, integration, learning curve)
  • Brand: Strong brand recognition and loyalty
  • Cost advantages: Scale economies, proprietary technology, favorable access to resources
  • Regulatory: Licenses, patents, compliance barriers

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Market Entry Strategy

  • Diagnosis: Assess market using Porter's 5 Forces + competitive profiling
  • Guiding Policy: Choose positioning (Blue Ocean or competitive response)
  • Coherent Actions: Go-to-market, product roadmap, pricing, partnerships

Pattern 2: Competitive Response

  • Diagnosis: Analyze competitor threat (new entrant, feature launch, price cut)
  • Guiding Policy: Defend, ignore, or leapfrog
  • Coherent Actions: Feature parity, differentiation doubling-down, or new positioning

Pattern 3: Strategic Planning (Annual)

  • Diagnosis: Current state SWOT + market trends + competitive landscape
  • Guiding Policy: Focus areas (3-5 strategic themes) for next year
  • Coherent Actions: OKRs, initiatives, resource allocation

Pattern 4: Differentiation Strategy

  • Diagnosis: Competitive positioning map + customer needs analysis
  • Guiding Policy: Differentiation axis (vertical, feature set, experience, business model)
  • Coherent Actions: Product roadmap, marketing messaging, pricing structure

Guardrails

Evidence-Based:

  • Ground diagnosis in data (market research, customer interviews, competitor analysis)
  • State assumptions explicitly (market size, growth rate, competitive response)
  • Distinguish facts from hypotheses
  • Cite sources for key claims

Coherence:

  • Actions must reinforce each other (not independent initiatives)
  • Actions must support guiding policy
  • Guiding policy must address diagnosis (not aspirational goals)
  • Strategy must be internally consistent (no contradictions)

Realism:

  • Acknowledge constraints (resources, capabilities, time, competition)
  • Identify risks and mitigation plans
  • Avoid wishful thinking ("if we just execute perfectly...")
  • Test strategy against competitive response scenarios

Specificity:

  • Diagnosis: specific challenge (not "we need to grow" but "customer acquisition cost exceeds LTV in current market")
  • Guiding Policy: clear approach (not "be customer-focused" but "vertical specialization in healthcare")
  • Coherent Actions: concrete steps with owners and timelines (not "improve product" but "build HIPAA compliance by Q2, led by Security Team")

Differentiation:

  • Strategy must be defensible against competition
  • Identify sustainable competitive advantages (moats)
  • Avoid "best practices" that competitors can easily copy
  • Explain why this strategy is hard for competitors to replicate

Quick Reference

Inputs Required:

  • Strategic question or decision to make
  • Business context (industry, stage, goals, constraints)
  • Competitive landscape (who are competitors, market dynamics)
  • Available resources and capabilities

Frameworks to Use:

  • Industry analysis → Porter's 5 Forces
  • Overall strategy → Good Strategy Kernel
  • Positioning → Blue Ocean Strategy Canvas, Value Chain Analysis
  • Portfolio → BCG Matrix
  • Competitor analysis → SWOT, Competitive Profiling

Outputs Produced:

  • strategy-and-competitive-analysis.md with:
    • Strategic question and context
    • Analysis (frameworks applied, findings, evidence)
    • Strategy summary (diagnosis, guiding policy, coherent actions)
    • Competitive positioning
    • Action plan (initiatives, owners, timelines, success metrics)
    • Assumptions, risks, mitigations

Resources:

  • Quick competitive analysis → resources/template.md [blocked]
  • Complex multi-framework strategy → resources/methodology.md [blocked]
  • Quality validation → resources/evaluators/rubric_strategy_and_competitive_analysis.json [blocked]

Minimum Quality Standard:

  • Diagnosis grounded in evidence (not assumptions)
  • Guiding policy addresses root challenge (not symptoms)
  • Coherent actions specific and mutually reinforcing
  • Competitive analysis rigorous (Porter's 5 Forces or equivalent)
  • Assumptions explicit, risks identified with mitigations
  • Average rubric score ≥ 3.5/5 before delivering

来源与署名

来源:lyndonkl/claude位于skills/strategy-and-competitive-analysis提交4acc337

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架