Conventional Commit

marcelorodrigo/agent-skills/skills/conventional-commit

作者 marcelorodrigo99d50948fbc18bce6107dafc74a92e86634acbc2MIT收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日

Create conventional commit messages following best conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits specification.

AI 生成的概览

指导为 git 变更编写符合约定式提交规范的提交信息和分支名称。

功能
提供按约定式提交(Conventional Commits)格式编写 git 提交信息的规范,包括标题、正文和页脚结构。它列出 feat、fix、docs、refactor 等提交类型、主题行规则、正文指南、破坏性变更与回滚格式,以及分支命名模式。产出的是格式化的提交信息和分支名称,而非代码。
适用场景
适用于提交代码变更、起草提交信息或整理 git 历史记录时。也适用于在提交前检查是否位于功能分支。
运行要求
需要 git 来执行文中所示的分支检查命令。不附带脚本或软件包,仅为说明性指令。

Conventional Commit Messages

Follow these conventions when creating commits.

Prerequisites

Before committing, ensure you're working on a feature branch, not the main branch.

bash
# Check current branchgit branch --show-current

If you're on main or master, create a new branch first:

bash
# Create and switch to a new branchgit checkout -b <type>/<short-description>

Branch naming should follow the pattern: <type>/<short-description> where type matches the commit type (e.g., feat/add-user-auth, fix/null-pointer-error, refactor/extract-validation).

Format

<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<body>
<footer>

The header is required. Scope is optional. All lines must stay under 100 characters.

Commit Types

TypePurpose
buildBuild system or CI changes
choreRoutine maintenance tasks
ciContinuous integration configuration
depsDependency updates
docsDocumentation changes
featNew feature
fixBug fix
perfPerformance improvement
refactorCode refactoring (no behavior change)
revertRevert a previous commit
styleCode style and formatting
testTests added, updated or improved

Subject Line Rules

  • Use imperative, present tense: "add feature" not "added feature"
  • Do not capitalize the first letter
  • No period at the end
  • Maximum 70 characters

Body Guidelines

  • Explain what and why, not how
  • Use imperative mood and present tense
  • Include motivation for the change
  • Contrast with previous behavior when relevant

Conventional Commits

The commit contains the following structural elements, to communicate intent to the consumers of your library:

  • fix: a commit of the type fix patches a bug in your codebase (this correlates with PATCH in Semantic Versioning).
  • feat: a commit of the type feat introduces a new feature to the codebase (this correlates with MINOR in Semantic Versioning).
  • BREAKING CHANGE: a commit that has a footer BREAKING CHANGE:, or appends a ! after the type/scope, introduces a breaking API change (correlating with MAJOR in Semantic Versioning). A BREAKING CHANGE can be part of commits of any type.
  • types other than fix: and feat: are allowed, for example @commitlint/config-conventional (based on the Angular convention) recommends build:, chore:, ci:, docs:, style:, refactor:, perf:, test:, and others.
  • footers other than BREAKING CHANGE: <description> may be provided and follow a convention similar to git trailer format.

Examples

Simple fix

fix(api): handle null response in user endpoint
The user API could return null for deleted accounts, causing a crashin the dashboard. Add null check before accessing user properties.

Feature with scope

feat(alerts): add Slack thread replies for alert updates
When an alert is updated or resolved, post a reply to the originalSlack thread instead of creating a new message. This keeps relatednotifications grouped together.

Refactor

refactor: extract common validation logic to shared module
Move duplicate validation code from three endpoints into a sharedvalidator class. No behavior change.

Breaking change

feat(api)!: remove deprecated v1 endpoints
Remove all v1 API endpoints that were deprecated in version 23.1.Clients should migrate to v2 endpoints.
BREAKING CHANGE: v1 endpoints no longer available

Revert Format

revert: feat(api): add new endpoint
This reverts commit abc123def456.
Reason: Caused performance regression in production.

Principles

  • Each commit should be a single, stable change
  • Commits should be independently reviewable
  • The repository should be in a working state after each commit

References

来源与署名

来源:marcelorodrigo/agent-skills位于skills/conventional-commit提交99d5094

许可证: MIT

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架