Nemo Mbridge Perf Moe Long Context

nvidia/skills/skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-long-context

作者 nvidiacf5224d14250Apache-2.03.5K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库今天更新

Long-context MoE training guidance for Megatron Bridge. Covers CP sizing, selective recompute, dispatcher choices, and practical patterns from DSV3, Qwen3, and Qwen3-Next long-context experiments.

仅含说明AI & Agents
AI 生成的概览

为 Megatron Bridge 的长上下文 MoE 训练提供配置指导,涵盖上下文并行、重计算、调度器与常见陷阱。

功能
该技能为在 Megatron Bridge 中以长序列长度训练混合专家(MoE)模型提供书面指导。它说明注意力内存与激活驻留如何成为主要瓶颈,并给出上下文并行规模估算、选择性重计算与完全重计算的取舍、调度器与流水线布局选择以及 CUDA Graph 使用的经验规则。它还列出 DSV3 与 Qwen3 模型在 128K 和 256K 下的代表性配置组合,以及常见陷阱。其产出是建议与配置模式,而非代码或文件。
适用场景
适用于以长序列长度训练 MoE 模型,或排查导致长上下文 MoE 显存不足、吞吐下降的改动时。在为 128K 级别训练选择上下文并行规模、重计算设置或调度器时也适用。
运行要求
不需要脚本或工具,仅为说明与参考资料。它按路径引用配套文档和另一个技能,并假定使用者熟悉 Megatron Bridge 的训练配置。

MoE Long-Context Training

Stable docs: @docs/training/moe-optimization.md Card: @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-long-context/card.yaml

What Changes At Long Context

Once sequence length moves well past the 4K-class regime, attention memory and activation residency become the dominant constraints. For MoE models, that usually means you need some combination of:

  • context parallelism
  • selective recompute
  • lower precision
  • CPU offload for optimizer state
  • a dispatcher and PP layout that do not waste the smaller remaining DP budget

Rounded Scaling Patterns

DSV3 on H100

The DSV3 long-context runs show a stable pattern:

  • selective recompute works better than full recompute once you move past the shortest contexts
  • throughput stays in a fairly narrow band from mid-length through very long contexts if CP is increased appropriately
  • the trade shifts from "memory fit" to "GPU-count feasibility" as CP grows

In other words, long context does not immediately collapse utilization if the layout is chosen well, but it does consume the DP budget very quickly.

Qwen3-Next on GB200

Qwen3-Next behaves more like a memory-sensitive medium-scale model:

  • 8K and 32K remain practical with moderate CP
  • 64K is possible, but the throughput drop is noticeable and memory becomes much tighter
  • pipeline layout and grouped-GEMM improvements matter almost as much as CP

Qwen3 235B on GB200

Qwen3 235B shows that long context can still be efficient on NVL72 systems when TP, CP, and HybridEP are coordinated. The best 128K-class configurations are not just "fit-only" recipes; they can remain highly efficient if routing, parallelism, and recompute are balanced.

CP Sizing Rules Of Thumb

  1. Start from a 4K shard target: a good first guess is CP ~= seq_len / 4096, then round to a practical power-of-two layout.

  2. Keep DP alive if possible: long-context scaling becomes brittle once CP, EP, TP, and PP together squeeze DP down to the floor.

  3. Prefer selective recompute: recompute modules such as up_proj, norm, moe, moe_act, or mlp before reaching for full recompute.

  4. Avoid SDPA-heavy recompute at very long context: recomputing attention internals can add a lot of work for less memory benefit than recomputing smaller MoE and MLP-side modules.

  5. Use TP as another lever on NVL72 systems: GB200 and GB300 runs can sometimes trade some CP for TP while still staying efficient.

  6. Assume GBS will need to shrink: as CP rises and DP falls, you may need to reduce global batch size or accept higher GA.

Representative Config Families

DSV3 at 128K on H100

text
TP=1  CP=32  EP=32  PP=8  VPP=4Precision: FP8-classDispatcher: DeepEPRecompute: up_proj, norm, moe, mlpExtra memory help: optimizer CPU offload

DSV3 at 256K on H100

text
TP=1  CP=64  EP=32  PP=8  EDP=2  VPP=4Precision: FP8-classDispatcher: DeepEPRecompute: up_proj, norm, moe, mlpExtra memory help: optimizer CPU offload

Qwen3 235B at 128K on GB200

text
TP=4  CP=4  EP=32  PP=4  VPP=12Precision: BF16 or MXFP8Dispatcher: HybridEPRecompute: moe_act, normCUDA Graph: attn + moe_router + moe_preprocess

Recompute And CUDA Graph Guidance

For long-context MoE training:

  • start with selective recompute
  • add CUDA graphs only after the shapes and routing path are stable
  • keep sequence length and MBS fixed when using CUDA graphs
  • if the run depends on highly dynamic batches, prefer eager execution

Useful references:

  • @docs/training/activation-recomputation.md
  • @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-cuda-graphs/SKILL.md

Pitfalls

  1. CP does not replace EP or PP: it adds another dimension; it does not make the others disappear.

  2. A good 4K baseline can still be a bad long-context baseline: routing mode, recompute choice, and offload strategy often need to change.

  3. GPU-count feasibility becomes the real constraint: very long context can look fine in a single recipe, then become impossible once EP and PP are added honestly across the full model.

  4. CUDA graphs need static shapes: variable-length batches and opportunistic padding strategies can silently break the path.

  5. Container and kernel support matters more at 128K+: long-context paths tend to rely on newer kernels and bug fixes than short-context bring-up does.

来源与署名

来源:nvidia/skills位于skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-moe-long-context提交cf5224d

许可证: Apache-2.0

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架