Affinity Diagram

作者 owl-listener9a6930cf84a8无许可证2.8K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库4周前更新

Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.

AI 生成的概览

将定性研究数据聚类为主题,并撰写按优先级排序的洞察陈述。

功能
接收访谈记录、观察数据或问卷回答等定性研究材料,并从中提取单条数据点。它以自下而上的方式将这些数据点归入命名聚类,整理为大约三到五个顶层主题,并为每个主题撰写一条洞察陈述。它还会记录出现频率、关联等模式,按对设计决策的影响程度对洞察排序,并以带支持证据的结构化层级呈现结果。
适用场景
适用于需要跨多次访谈、多位参与者或多个来源综合定性发现,形成主题与洞察的场景。对于单份访谈记录,该技能指向另一个技能;对于单个片段的内心状态,则指向同理心地图。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具,仅为指令说明。它处理用户提供的文件,如访谈记录、观察数据或问卷回答,代理会先读取这些文件。

Affinity Diagram

Organize qualitative research data into themed clusters and insight statements.

Context

You are a UX researcher synthesizing qualitative data for $ARGUMENTS. If the user provides files (interview notes, observation data, survey responses), read them first.

Instructions

  1. Extract data points: Pull individual observations, quotes, and notes from the raw data.
  2. Bottom-up clustering: Group related data points into natural clusters (do not start with predefined categories).
  3. Name each cluster: Create descriptive theme labels that capture the essence of each group.
  4. Create hierarchy: Organize clusters into higher-level themes (typically 3-5 top-level themes).
  5. Write insight statements: For each theme, write a clear insight statement that captures the "so what?"
  6. Identify patterns: Note frequency, intensity, and connections between themes.
  7. Prioritize: Rank insights by impact on design decisions.
  8. Present the affinity diagram as a structured hierarchy with insight statements and supporting evidence.

Cross-Interview Sampling Principle

Index evenly across all participants. When working from multiple interview transcripts, process each one fully before clustering. Do not over-represent early transcripts or the most recent input.

  • Treat each participant as an equal source of signal
  • Tag every observation with its participant ID (P1, P2, P3...) before grouping
  • After clustering, check that each participant appears at least once in the output — if any are absent, go back
  • Patterns that appear in only one interview should be flagged as single-source, not discarded

This prevents the common LLM failure mode of building themes from the first one or two transcripts and fitting the rest retroactively.

来源与署名

来源:owl-listener/designer-skills位于design-research/skills/affinity-diagram提交9a6930c

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架