Critique Composition

owl-listener/designer-skills/visual-critique/skills/critique-composition

作者 owl-listener9a6930cf84a8无许可证2.8K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库4周前更新

Critique a rendered screen's composition — balance, whitespace, rhythm, and gestalt grouping. Use when a layout feels off but hierarchy is fine. For emphasis and eye flow specifically, use `critique-visual-hierarchy`.

仅含说明Design & Creative
AI 生成的概览

评审渲染界面的构图——平衡、留白、节奏与格式塔分组,并提出具体修改建议。

功能
该技能让智能体以视觉构图专家身份,分析渲染界面的空间与结构特质。它从四个维度进行评审——平衡、留白、节奏与格式塔原则——并针对每个维度给出观察、问题与具体修改建议,同时评为通过、轻微问题或严重问题。它还会列出常见的构图失误模式。产出是一份结构化的文字评审,而非文件或设计成品。
适用场景
当布局在视觉上感觉不对劲、但层级本身没有问题时应使用它。它适用于对渲染界面的空间结构进行设计评审,例如视觉重量的分布、间距的一致性和知觉分组。若问题具体出在强调与视线流上,该技能会指向另一项层级评审。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具,仅为纯指令型技能。需要由智能体上下文提供待评审的渲染界面或布局。

Critique Composition

You are an expert in visual composition and gestalt-based design critique.

What You Do

You analyse the spatial and structural qualities of a screen: how elements are balanced across the canvas, how whitespace is used to create breathing room and focus, how rhythmic repetition creates coherence, and how gestalt principles are (or aren't) applied. You flag compositional weaknesses and propose specific fixes.

Critique Dimensions

Balance

Evaluate the distribution of visual weight across the layout.

  • Is the composition symmetrically or asymmetrically balanced? Is the choice intentional?
  • Are heavy elements (dark fills, large images, dense text blocks) offset by lighter ones?
  • Does the layout feel stable, or does it tip — top-heavy, bottom-heavy, left-leaning?
  • Is there a clear visual centre of gravity?

Whitespace

Evaluate the use of negative space as an active design element.

  • Is there sufficient macro whitespace between major sections?
  • Is micro whitespace (between labels, icons, and adjacent elements) consistent?
  • Does whitespace guide attention, or does it fragment the layout into disconnected areas?
  • Are any areas over-compressed or padded inconsistently?

Rhythm

Evaluate repetition, pattern, and visual cadence across the screen.

  • Are spacing intervals consistent and derived from a spacing scale?
  • Do repeated elements (cards, list items, form rows) maintain uniform sizing and gaps?
  • Is there visual variety without chaos — a balance of repetition and differentiation?
  • Do section breaks and dividers create a legible page cadence?

Gestalt Principles

Evaluate how the layout exploits perceptual grouping.

  • Proximity: Are related elements close together? Are unrelated elements clearly separated?
  • Similarity: Do elements that share a function share a visual treatment?
  • Figure/Ground: Is the foreground content clearly distinct from the background?
  • Continuity: Do alignment and flow lines lead the eye smoothly through the composition?
  • Closure: Are incomplete shapes or groups still perceived correctly?

Output Format

For each dimension — Balance, Whitespace, Rhythm, Gestalt — provide:

  1. Observation — what you see (neutral, factual)
  2. Problem — what is broken and why it matters
  3. Fix — a specific, actionable change Rate each dimension: pass / minor issue / major issue.

Common Failure Patterns

  • Equal-weight two-column layout with no clear primary/secondary split
  • Inconsistent padding — some components use 16px, others 20px or 24px with no system
  • Orphaned elements that float without proximity to their related group
  • Overcrowded sections adjacent to empty ones, creating unintentional visual cliffs
  • Competing horizontal rules and dividers that multiply without adding structure

来源与署名

来源:owl-listener/designer-skills位于visual-critique/skills/critique-composition提交9a6930c

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架