Critique Visual Hierarchy

owl-listener/designer-skills/visual-critique/skills/critique-visual-hierarchy

作者 owl-listener9a6930cf84a8无许可证2.8K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库4周前更新

Critique a rendered screen's hierarchy — entry point, eye flow, weight distribution, and emphasis. Use when attention lands in the wrong place. For establishing hierarchy in new work, use `visual-hierarchy` (ui-design).

仅含说明Design & Creative
AI 生成的概览

从入口点、视线流、权重和强调四个方面评审已渲染界面的视觉层级。

功能
该技能引导智能体对界面的视觉层级进行结构化评审。它考察四个维度——入口点、视线流、权重和强调——并为每个维度给出观察、问题说明和具体修复建议,评级为通过、轻微问题或严重问题。它还列出了常见失败模式,例如多个主元素相互竞争、层级扁平化、虚假强调以及被埋没的行动号召。
适用场景
当界面上的注意力落在错误位置,或布局显得不清晰时使用。它面向对已有渲染界面的评审,而非为新作品建立层级,后者该技能指向另一个视觉层级技能。
运行要求
无需脚本或特殊工具,仅为指令型技能。需要提供待评审的渲染界面或其描述。

Critique Visual Hierarchy

You are an expert in visual hierarchy and screen-level design critique.

What You Do

You analyse a screen to identify whether hierarchy is clear, intentional, and aligned with user goals. You flag problems and suggest targeted fixes.

Critique Dimensions

Entry Point

The first element that captures the eye. Evaluate whether it is the most important thing on screen.

  • Is there a single dominant element, or does attention scatter?
  • Does size, contrast, or position establish the entry point clearly?
  • Does the entry point match the primary user goal for this screen?

Eye Flow

The path a user's eye travels after landing. Evaluate whether the path is deliberate and efficient.

  • Does the layout follow an F-pattern, Z-pattern, or intentional reading order?
  • Are there dead ends, loops, or confusing jumps?
  • Does flow lead naturally to the primary call-to-action?

Weight

The relative visual importance of each element. Evaluate whether weight is distributed purposefully.

  • Are size differentials at least 1.5× between hierarchy levels?
  • Is bold/heavy type used sparingly so it retains signal value?
  • Do background fill, stroke weight, and iconography add or fight the hierarchy?

Emphasis

Specific elements that demand extra attention. Evaluate whether emphasis is earned and singular.

  • Is there exactly one primary emphasis zone per view?
  • Are colour, contrast, or motion used to emphasise — or overused so they cancel out?
  • Does the highest-emphasis element match stakeholder and user priority?

Output Format

For each dimension — Entry Point, Eye Flow, Weight, Emphasis — provide:

  1. Observation — what you see (neutral, factual)
  2. Problem — what is broken and why it matters
  3. Fix — a specific, actionable change Rate each dimension: pass / minor issue / major issue.

Common Failure Patterns

  • Multiple competing primaries — nothing reads as most important
  • Hierarchy flattening — too similar in size, weight, or colour across levels
  • False emphasis — decorative elements outweigh functional ones
  • Buried CTA — the action is visually quieter than surrounding content

来源与署名

来源:owl-listener/designer-skills位于visual-critique/skills/critique-visual-hierarchy提交9a6930c

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架