Review

作者 parcadeid07ff4b06b62无许可证3.9K 个星标收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日仓库8个月前更新

Comprehensive code review workflow - parallel specialized reviews → synthesis

仅含说明Software Development
AI 生成的概览

运行多视角代码审查流程，并行执行专项审查并给出最终综合结论。

功能
该技能定义了一套代码审查流程，将审查任务并行分派给多个专项代理，分别关注代码质量、架构一致性和变更影响。随后由综合代理汇总各项发现，给出 APPROVE、REQUEST_CHANGES 或 NEEDS_DISCUSSION 的最终结论，并列出按优先级排序的阻塞与非阻塞事项。它还描述了完整审查、快速审查、安全专项审查和拉取请求审查等模式。
适用场景
适用于被要求审查代码、拉取请求或合并前的实现，或需要设置质量门禁的场景。也适合针对重要变更获取反馈和风险评估的请求。
运行要求
仅为说明性指令，不包含脚本。它假定运行环境支持按指定代理类型（critic、plan-reviewer、review-agent，以及可选的 aegis）分派子代理任务并支持后台执行。

/review - Code Review Workflow

Multi-perspective code review with parallel specialists.

When to Use

  • "Review this code"
  • "Review my PR"
  • "Check this before I merge"
  • "Get feedback on implementation"
  • Before merging significant changes
  • Quality gates

Workflow Overview

         ┌──────────┐         │  critic  │ ─┐         │ (code)   │  │         └──────────┘  │                       │         ┌──────────┐  │      ┌──────────────┐         │plan-reviewer│ ─┼────▶ │ review-agent │         │ (plan)   │  │      │ (synthesis)  │         └──────────┘  │      └──────────────┘                       │         ┌──────────┐  │         │plan-reviewer│ ─┘         │ (change) │         └──────────┘
         Parallel                Sequential         perspectives            synthesis

Agent Sequence

#AgentFocusExecution
1criticCode quality, patterns, readabilityParallel
1plan-reviewerArchitecture, plan adherenceParallel
1plan-reviewerChange impact, risk assessmentParallel
2review-agentSynthesize all reviews, final verdictAfter 1

Review Perspectives

  • critic: Is this good code? (Style, patterns, readability)
  • plan-reviewer: Does this match the design? (Architecture, plan)
  • plan-reviewer: Is this change safe? (Risk, impact, regressions)
  • review-agent: Overall assessment and recommendations

Execution

Phase 1: Parallel Reviews

# Code quality reviewTask(  subagent_type="critic",  prompt="""  Review code quality: [SCOPE]
  Evaluate:  - Code style and consistency  - Design patterns used  - Readability and maintainability  - Error handling  - Test coverage
  Output: List of issues with severity (critical/major/minor)  """,  run_in_background=true)
# Architecture reviewTask(  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",  prompt="""  Review architecture alignment: [SCOPE]
  Check:  - Follows established patterns  - Matches implementation plan (if exists)  - Consistent with system design  - No architectural violations
  Output: Alignment assessment with concerns  """,  run_in_background=true)
# Change impact reviewTask(  subagent_type="plan-reviewer",  prompt="""  Review change impact: [SCOPE]
  Assess:  - Risk level of changes  - Affected systems/components  - Backward compatibility  - Potential regressions  - Security implications
  Output: Risk assessment with recommendations  """,  run_in_background=true)
# Wait for all parallel reviews[Check TaskOutput for all three]

Phase 2: Synthesis

Task(  subagent_type="review-agent",  prompt="""  Synthesize reviews for: [SCOPE]
  Reviews:  - critic: [code quality findings]  - plan-reviewer: [architecture findings]  - plan-reviewer: [change impact findings]
  Create final review:  - Overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / NEEDS_DISCUSSION)  - Prioritized action items  - Blocking vs non-blocking issues  - Summary for PR description  """)

Review Modes

Full Review

User: /review→ All four agents, comprehensive review

Quick Review

User: /review --quick→ critic only, fast feedback

Security Focus

User: /review --security→ Add aegis (security agent) to parallel phase

PR Review

User: /review PR #123→ Fetch PR diff, review changes

Example

User: /review the authentication changes
Claude: Starting /review workflow...
Phase 1: Running parallel reviews...┌────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ critic: Reviewing code quality...          ││ plan-reviewer: Checking architecture...         ││ plan-reviewer: Assessing change impact...         │└────────────────────────────────────────────┘
critic: Found 2 issues- [minor] Inconsistent error messages in auth.ts- [major] Missing input validation in login()
plan-reviewer: ✅ Matches authentication plan
plan-reviewer: Medium risk- Affects: login, signup, password reset- Breaking change: session token format
Phase 2: Synthesizing...
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ Review Summary                              │├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ Verdict: REQUEST_CHANGES                    ││                                             ││ Blocking:                                   ││ 1. Add input validation to login()          ││                                             ││ Non-blocking:                               ││ 2. Standardize error messages               ││                                             ││ Notes:                                      ││ - Document session token format change      ││ - Consider migration path for existing      ││   sessions                                  │└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Verdicts

  • APPROVE: Ready to merge, all issues are minor
  • REQUEST_CHANGES: Blocking issues must be fixed
  • NEEDS_DISCUSSION: Architectural decisions need input

来源与署名

来源：parcadei/continuous-claude-v3位于.claude/skills/review提交d07ff4b

许可证： 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架

更多来自 parcadei/continuous-claude-v3 的技能

Tldr Stats

parcadei

展示会话 token 用量、API 费用、TLDR 压缩节省额以及 hook 活动情况的仪表盘。

Data & Analytics3.9K8个月前更新

Wiring

parcadei

指导验证已构建的基础设施组件是否真正被调用，而非成为死代码。

Software Development3.9K8个月前更新

Workflow Router

parcadei

将用户目标路由到相应的专家代理和资源级别，用于研究、规划、构建或修复任务。

AI & Agents3.9K8个月前更新

Validate Agent

parcadei

根据当前最佳实践验证技术方案中的技术选型，并生成验证交接文档。

Software Development3.9K8个月前更新

Tour

parcadei

当用户询问能力时，提供友好的入门介绍，概述智能体可以做什么。

AI & Agents3.9K8个月前更新

Tldr Overview

parcadei

使用 TLDR 工具链生成节省 token 的项目概览，涵盖文件树、代码结构、调用图与复杂度。

Software Development3.9K8个月前更新

更多Software Development技能

Playground

anthropics

精选

构建自包含的交互式 HTML 演练场，包含控件、实时预览和可复制的提示词输出。

Software Development37K今天更新

M5 Onboard

anthropics

精选

通过 USB 检测 M5Stack ESP32 开发板，刷写 UIFlow 2.0 固件并安装 MicroPython 应用包。

Software Development37K今天更新

Cardputer Buddy

anthropics

精选

指导迭代 Cardputer-Adv 的 MicroPython 应用包：添加应用、通过 USB 串口推送文件、查看日志并运行 REPL 命令。

Software Development37K今天更新

Web Design Guidelines

vercel-labs

精选

依据从远程来源获取的 Web Interface Guidelines 审查 UI 代码，并以 file:line 形式报告问题。

Software Development32K5周前更新

Vercel React Native Skills

vercel-labs

精选

React Native 与 Expo 最佳实践规则，涵盖列表性能、动画、导航、UI 模式、状态与 monorepo 配置。

Software Development32K5周前更新

Vercel React Best Practices

vercel-labs

精选

Vercel 的 React 与 Next.js 性能指南，以 70 条规则的形式用于编写、审查和重构代码。

Software Development32K5周前更新