Qa Start

petrkindlmann/qa-skills/skills/qa-start

作者 petrkindlmannb3bb61bd268bMIT168 个星标收录于 2026年10月9日更新于 2026年10月9日仓库4个月前更新

Sequenced launcher that bootstraps QA on a project with no QA in place. Chains qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning in one guided run, then points you at automation. Use when: "set up QA on a new project," "QA from scratch," "no QA exists yet," "/qa-start." Not for: onboarding a QA engineer to an existing team with existing tests — use qa-project-bootstrap. Not for: "which skill do I use" with no clear match — use qa-do. Related: qa-project-context, test-strategy, test-planning, qa-project-bootstrap, qa-do.

AI 生成的概览

按顺序串联三个技能,为尚无 QA 的项目搭建质量保障基础。

功能
该启动器本身不含 QA 指导内容,而是按顺序串联 qa-project-context、test-strategy 和 test-planning 三个技能。第一步生成项目上下文文件,记录技术栈、测试框架、CI/CD、环境、覆盖率目标、风险领域和团队结构。第二步产出策略文档,涵盖测试金字塔、进入与退出标准、工具选型、环境覆盖和 CI 与发布的质量门禁。第三步产出首份测试计划,将功能映射到测试用例,并给出覆盖优先级、工作量估算和范围边界。
适用场景
适用于全新项目且没有测试基础设施、已有代码库完全没有 QA 设置,或测试被删除、覆盖率崩塌后需要重建 QA 的情况。不适用于为已有测试的团队引入 QA 工程师(应使用 qa-project-bootstrap),也不适用于没有明确匹配技能时的路由(应使用 qa-do)。
运行要求
不含脚本,仅为说明文档。跨工具,已在 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 和 Gemini CLI 上测试。会读写用户的项目根目录,无需网络访问。依赖相关技能 qa-project-context、test-strategy 和 test-planning 可用。

<objective>

A sequenced launcher for bootstrapping QA where none exists. It contains no QA guidance itself — it chains three skills in the correct order so engineers don't jump to writing tests before deciding what to test or why. Run qa-project-context → test-strategy → test-planning and you end with a context file, a strategy document, and a first test plan: a complete QA foundation.

</objective>

When to Use This

Reach for qa-start whenever the answer to "where do we start with QA?" is unclear and no QA foundation exists yet:

  • A brand-new project with no test infrastructure.
  • Joining an existing codebase that has no QA setup at all — old code, but quality work was never formalized. Still qa-start, not qa-project-bootstrap (that one is for joining a team that already has tests).
  • Rebooting QA after neglect — tests deleted, coverage collapsed, no strategy. You are rebooting QA from the foundation up.

If the codebase already has a real test suite and you are a QA engineer ramping onto the team, use qa-project-bootstrap instead.

Quick Route

Pick your entry point — skip any step whose artifact already exists.

SituationStart at
No QA at all (no context file, no strategy, no plan)Step 1
.agents/qa-project-context.md already populatedSkip Step 1 — invoke test-strategy (Step 2)
Context file AND strategy document both existSkip Steps 1 and 2 — invoke test-planning (Step 3)
All three done — what next?After Step 3
A QA engineer ramping onto an existing team with existing testsNot this skill — see qa-project-bootstrap

Step 1: Capture Project Context

Skill: qa-project-context

Creates .agents/qa-project-context.md in your project root. That file records your tech stack, test frameworks, CI/CD pipeline, environments, coverage goals, risk areas, and team structure. Every later skill reads it, so it never asks you the same questions twice.

What to do: Invoke qa-project-context and work through its discovery questions. The skill walks each section interactively, discovers what it can from the repo, and writes the file.

Done when: .agents/qa-project-context.md exists in your project root with all sections filled in. It is the source of truth for everything that follows.

Step 2: Create the Test Strategy

Skill: test-strategy

Produces a strategy document defining how the project approaches quality: the test pyramid (what proportion of unit, integration, and E2E tests fits your product), entry and exit criteria, tool selection, environment coverage, and quality gates for CI and release.

What to do: Invoke test-strategy once Step 1 is complete. It reads the context file automatically and will not re-ask anything answered there.

Done when: You have a strategy document (e.g. strategy.md) covering test-pyramid rationale, tool choices with justification, quality gates for CI and release, and entry/exit criteria per test type. One page of clear decisions beats a sprawling template.

Step 3: Build the First Test Plan

Skill: test-planning

Translates the strategy into an actionable plan for the first sprint or release. Maps features to test cases, assigns effort, and decides what gets covered first versus deferred.

What to do: Invoke test-planning after Step 2. It consumes the strategy from Step 2 and the context from Step 1. Provide the feature list or sprint scope when prompted.

Done when: You have a test plan (e.g. plan.md) with features mapped to test cases, coverage priorities set, effort estimated, and scope boundaries clear. This is the artifact your team executes against.

After Step 3

You now hold the foundation: context, strategy, and a first plan. Next actions depend on your stack — this launcher is not the final step.

  • First automated tests: Use playwright-automation or cypress-automation to write the first E2E tests against your highest-risk flows.
  • CI integration: Use ci-cd-integration to get tests running on every pull request.
  • Tracking quality: Use qa-metrics once the suite runs to define what health looks like and how to measure it over time.

qa-start vs qa-project-bootstrap vs qa-do

The single most common routing confusion, answered in one place:

  • qa-start — bootstrap QA where none exists. New project, or QA was deleted and you are rebooting it. Sequence: context → strategy → first plan. Output is the QA foundation.
  • qa-project-bootstrap — a 30-day ramp for a QA engineer joining an existing team with existing tests. Covers team processes, onboarding timeline, and an audit of the test suite already in place. Use it after a foundation exists, not to create one.
  • qa-do — last-resort router for "which skill do I use?" when nothing clearly matches. If you already know you have no QA, skip it and run qa-start.

A brand-new project with no QA — even on an old codebase — is always qa-start, never qa-project-bootstrap.

Pin as a Manual Command

Re-run anytime from the Claude Code /skills menu.

To pin this skill as a manual-only command, add disable-model-invocation: true to the frontmatter, or set it via skillOverrides in .claude/settings.local.json.

Caveat: in some Claude Code builds disable-model-invocation: true also suppresses the manual slash command (ref anthropics/claude-code#26251). If you still want to invoke /qa-start by hand, set the skillOverrides state to user-invocable-only instead.

Related Skills

  • qa-project-context — Step 1. Captures project setup, tech stack, and quality goals into .agents/qa-project-context.md.
  • test-strategy — Step 2. Defines the testing approach, pyramid, tools, and quality gates.
  • test-planning — Step 3. Builds the first test plan with features mapped to test cases.
  • qa-project-bootstrap — go here instead when a QA engineer is ramping onto an existing team with existing tests; this skill creates the foundation, bootstrap onboards onto one.
  • qa-do — last-resort router when no skill clearly matches; not needed if you already know there is no QA.
  • playwright-automation / cypress-automation — after the plan, write the first E2E tests against your highest-risk flows.

来源与署名

来源:petrkindlmann/qa-skills位于skills/qa-start提交b3bb61b

许可证: MIT

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架

更多来自 petrkindlmann/qa-skills 的技能

Visual Testing

petrkindlmann

指导使用 Playwright 截图以及 Chromatic、Percy、Argos CI 等托管工具进行视觉回归测试。

Software Development1684个月前更新

Unit Testing

petrkindlmann

指导使用 Jest、Vitest 和 pytest 编写有效的单元测试,涵盖测试替身、覆盖率门禁、快照、假定时器和变异测试。

Software Development1684个月前更新

Test Suite Curation

petrkindlmann

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

待分类1684个月前更新

Test Strategy

petrkindlmann

Produce a multi-quarter QA strategy document. Covers scope, risk-based prioritization, test levels (unit/integration/E2E), pyramid analysis, entry/exit criteria, quality KPIs, tool selection rationale, CI scaling levers, and timeline planning. Output is an actionable strategy document, not a shelf document. Use when: "test strategy," "QA strategy doc," "testing approach," "QA roadmap," "multi-quarter QA direction." Not for: a single-sprint or single-release plan — use test-planning. Not for: identifying which areas carry the most risk — use risk-based-testing first. Related: risk-based-testing, qa-metrics, release-readiness, test-planning, test-reliability.

待分类1684个月前更新

Test Planning

petrkindlmann

为单个冲刺或发布制定一页式测试计划,涵盖覆盖映射、工作量估算、优先级排序、资源分配与排期。

Productivity & Workflow1684个月前更新

Test Migration

petrkindlmann

指导测试套件在不同框架之间增量迁移,例如 Selenium、Cypress 或 Jest 迁移到 Playwright 或 Vitest,并支持并行 CI。

Software Development1684个月前更新