Creating Experiments

作者 PostHog469d1773e9cb无许可证收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日

Guides agents through the 3-step experiment creation flow: defining the hypothesis, configuring rollout, and setting up analytics. Delegates rollout decisions to configuring-experiment-rollout and metric setup to configuring-experiment-analytics. TRIGGER when: user asks to create a new experiment or A/B test, OR when you are about to call experiment-create. DO NOT TRIGGER when: user is updating an existing experiment, managing lifecycle, or only browsing experiments.

AI 生成的概览

引导智能体通过三步流程在 PostHog 中创建新的 A/B 测试实验。

功能
该技能引导智能体按三步流程创建新的 A/B 测试实验:定义假设与功能开关、配置放量,以及设置分析指标。它说明了 experiment-create 调用的参数,包括变体分配和整体放量百分比,并将放量与指标决策交由相关技能处理。创建完成后,它指示智能体展示实验链接、提醒用户在代码中实现该开关、引导指标设置,并在就绪时启动实验。
适用场景
当用户要求创建新实验或 A/B 测试时使用,或当智能体即将调用 experiment-create 时使用。它不适用于更新现有实验、管理实验生命周期或仅浏览实验的场景。
运行要求
需要访问 PostHog 实验相关工具,包括 experiment-create、experiment-update 和 experiment-launch,以及相关技能 configuring-experiment-rollout 和 configuring-experiment-analytics。该技能不包含脚本,仅为说明文档。

Creating experiments

This skill walks through the 3-step flow for creating a new A/B test experiment.

Core principle: draft first, iterate on details

Create the experiment as a draft quickly, then iterate on metrics and configuration. The user gets a tangible draft immediately and can refine it.

The 3-step creation flow

Step 1: What are we testing?

Gather these before calling experiment-create:

  • Experiment name — descriptive, inferred from context when possible
  • Hypothesis — what you expect to happen (goes in description)
  • Feature flag key — kebab-case. Ask if they want a new flag or to reuse an existing one. The flag is auto-created — do NOT create one separately.
  • Type — leave empty (will internally default to "product". The "web" value is reserved for no-code experiments configured visually with the PostHog toolbar in a browser; it cannot be meaningfully driven via MCP. If a user asks for a no-code/toolbar experiment, point them to the PostHog UI instead of creating one here.)

If the user gives enough context to infer these, don't ask — just proceed.

Step 2: Who sees what variant?

This is about rollout configuration.

Before asking any rollout question, load configuring-experiment-rollout. The disambiguation wording, recommendations, and post-answer branches live there — do not formulate rollout questions yourself, and do not assume an example you remember covers the user's path.

Key decision points (covered in detail by configuring-experiment-rollout):

  • Variant split (how many variants, what percentage each)
  • Overall rollout percentage (what % of all users enter the experiment)
  • Whether to persist the flag across authentication steps

If the user doesn't mention rollout specifics, use defaults: 50/50 control/test, 100% rollout.

Step 3: How to measure impact?

This is about analytics and metrics. Load the configuring-experiment-analytics skill for guidance. That skill's first step checks for an existing shared metric to reuse before building a new one — don't duplicate a metric the project already has set up.

Do NOT configure metrics on creation. Metrics are not passed to experiment-create — they are added afterwards via experiment-update. This keeps the creation call lightweight.

When the user specifies metrics upfront, acknowledge them and add them immediately after creation. When they don't, create the draft and then guide them through metric setup as a follow-up.

How to create

Call experiment-create with:

json
{  "name": "Descriptive experiment name",  "feature_flag_key": "kebab-case-key",  "description": "Hypothesis: [what you expect to happen]",  "feature_flag": {    "filters": {      "multivariate": {        "variants": [          { "key": "control", "name": "Control", "rollout_percentage": 50 },          { "key": "test", "name": "Test", "rollout_percentage": 50 }        ]      },      "groups": [{ "properties": [], "rollout_percentage": 100 }]    },    "ensure_experience_continuity": false  }}

Flag config goes in the feature_flag object, in the flag's own filters shape (not the deprecated parameters keys). Two different percentages live in there, do NOT mix them up:

  • filters.multivariate.variants[].rollout_percentage is how users inside the experiment are split across variants (must sum to 100, recommended to have an even split).
  • filters.groups[0].rollout_percentage is the overall gate: what fraction of all users enter the experiment at all (0-100, defaults to 100).

Key details:

  • Minimum 2, maximum 20 variants. No specific variant key is required — the analysis baseline defaults to the variant keyed "control" when present, else the first variant (override with stats_config.baseline_variant_key). Convention: key the baseline "control" unless the user asks for specific keys.
  • filters.groups[0].rollout_percentage defaults to 100 if omitted.
  • ensure_experience_continuity persists a user's variant across authentication steps; leave it false unless the flag is shown to both logged-out and logged-in users (see configuring-experiment-rollout).
  • Stats default to Bayesian. Only set stats_config if the user requests Frequentist.

After creation

  1. Always show the experiment URL. The experiment-create response includes _posthogUrl — always display this link so the user can view and configure the experiment in the UI.

  2. Remind the user to implement the feature flag in code. Link to the experiment page and say "implement the flag as shown here" — the experiment detail page shows implementation snippets for the user's SDK.

  3. Guide through metrics if not yet configured — load the configuring-experiment-analytics skill.

  4. Launch when ready — use the experiment-launch tool.

Related skills

  • configuring-experiment-rollout — variant splits, rollout percentage, and who sees the test
  • configuring-experiment-analytics — exposure criteria and primary/secondary metrics
  • managing-experiment-lifecycle — launch, pause, ship, and end once the experiment exists

来源与署名

来源:PostHog/ai-plugin位于skills/creating-experiments提交469d177

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架

更多来自 PostHog/ai-plugin 的技能

Writing Simplified Technical English

PostHog

应用 ASD-STE100 简化技术英语规则,让智能体撰写的文字含义明确、便于执行。

Writing & Content2026年10月8日

Working With Task Comments

PostHog

通过 PostHog MCP exec 调度器读取并解读 PostHog 任务、产物和画布上的评论。

Productivity & Workflow2026年10月8日

Working With Skills

PostHog

指导智能体使用 PostHog 的 skill-* MCP 工具来发现、读取、创建、更新和重构技能。

AI & Agents2026年10月8日

Working With Scouts

PostHog

关于如何把监控任务委派给 PostHog Signals 侦察代理、处理其报告并长期调校整个代理集群的操作手册。

AI & Agents2026年10月8日

Validating And Publishing Canvases

PostHog

Validate and publish a canvas source project safely: the source-project shape, declared capabilities, reading the current version pointer, iterating on validation diagnostics, guarded publishing with expected_current_version_id, staging a draft build and promoting it, waiting out the queued build, and recovering from a 409 version_conflict or a 429 capacity limit without overwriting concurrent work. Use whenever a canvas edit is ready to save, a draft build is wanted, a canvas publish or build returns diagnostics or a conflict, or a task needs to understand canvas version history.

待分类2026年10月8日

Understanding Billing Usage

PostHog

Explains PostHog billing usage and spend from the customer's visible Billing MCP tools. Use when the user asks why usage or spend is high, which product or project is driving usage, what a usage type means, how to reduce usage, what changed over time, why they got a usage change alert, or whether a spike/drop alert was real or noisy. Also use before product-specific analytics skills when the user names a billable PostHog product metric such as events, recordings, feature flag requests, exceptions, survey responses, synced rows, logs, AI events, AI credits, or Inbox credits. Starts from Billing usage/spend tools, then routes to customer-visible product MCP surfaces for deeper investigation.

待分类2026年10月8日