Investigating Replay

作者 PostHog469d1773e9cb无许可证收录于 2026年10月8日更新于 2026年10月8日

Investigates a session recording by gathering metadata, person profile, same-session events, and linked error tracking issues in one pass. Use when a user provides a recording or session ID and wants to understand what happened — who the user was, what they did, what errors occurred, and whether there are related error tracking issues. Replaces the manual chain of session-recording-get, persons-retrieve, execute-sql, and query-error-tracking-issues-list.

AI 生成的概览

通过收集元数据、用户资料、同会话事件和关联错误跟踪问题,调查 PostHog 会话录制。

功能
该技能引导智能体一次性调查 PostHog 会话录制。它会收集录制元数据和用户资料,通过 SQL 查询同会话事件与异常,查找关联的错误跟踪问题,并可选地请求 Replay Vision AI 摘要。随后将发现综合成叙述,涵盖用户是谁、做了什么、出现了什么问题以及相关错误跟踪问题。
适用场景
当用户提供会话录制或会话 ID 并想了解该会话中发生了什么时使用。适用于回答用户是谁、采取了哪些操作、出现了哪些错误,以及是否存在相关错误跟踪问题。
运行要求
需要访问 PostHog MCP 工具,包括会话录制、用户、SQL 查询、错误跟踪问题以及 Replay Vision 扫描器和观察记录。不附带脚本,仅为指令。可选的 Replay Vision 摘要为异步操作,可能需要经用户许可创建临时扫描器。

Investigating a session recording

When a user asks "what happened in this session?" or provides a recording/session ID to investigate, gather all relevant context in parallel rather than making them ask for each piece.

Available tools

ToolPurpose
posthog:session-recording-getRecording metadata (duration, counts, status)
posthog:persons-retrievePerson profile (properties, distinct IDs)
posthog:execute-sqlQuery events, errors, and page views in session
posthog:query-error-tracking-issues-listFind error tracking issues linked to the session
posthog:vision-observations-listCheck for an existing Replay Vision AI summary
posthog:vision-scanners-listFind summarizer scanners (scanner_type=summarizer)
posthog:vision-scanners-scan-sessionRun a summarizer scanner on the session (slow, optional)
posthog:vision-scanners-createCreate a temporary summarizer scanner (ask first)
posthog:vision-scanners-deleteDelete a temporary scanner after summarizing

Workflow

Step 1 — Get recording metadata and person profile

Start with the recording to get metadata and the person's distinct ID:

json
posthog:session-recording-get{  "id": "<session_id>"}

The recording id and the event $session_id are the same value. It selects the recording here and the same-session events in Step 2. The response includes distinct_id, person, start_time, end_time, duration, interaction counts, console error counts, and viewing status. Use the distinct_id to fetch the full person profile:

json
posthog:persons-retrieve{  "id": "<person_uuid_from_recording>"}

Step 2 — Query same-session events

Use the recording id from Step 1 as the $session_id value. Get the timeline of what the user did during the session:

sql
posthog:execute-sqlSELECT    timestamp,    event,    properties.$current_url AS url,    properties.$browser AS browser,    properties.$os AS os,    properties.$device_type AS device_type,    properties.$screen_width AS screen_widthFROM eventsWHERE $session_id = '<session_id>'ORDER BY timestamp ASCLIMIT 200

For sessions with many events, focus on the most informative ones:

sql
posthog:execute-sqlSELECT    timestamp,    event,    properties.$current_url AS url,    if(event = '$exception', properties.$exception_values[1], null) AS exception_message,    if(event = '$exception', properties.$exception_types[1], null) AS exception_typeFROM eventsWHERE $session_id = '<session_id>'    AND event IN ('$pageview', '$pageleave', '$autocapture', '$exception', '$rageclick')ORDER BY timestamp ASCLIMIT 100
No rows? Recover the event session ID

The recording id is the session ID. No rows means the session's events were ingested without it. Find candidates from the person's events in the recording window, padded by 100 seconds like the replay events query. person_id covers all of the person's distinct IDs:

sql
posthog:execute-sqlSELECT    properties.$session_id AS session_id,    count() AS event_count,    min(timestamp) AS first_seen,    max(timestamp) AS last_seenFROM eventsWHERE person_id = '<person_uuid>'    AND timestamp >= toDateTime('<start_time>') - INTERVAL 100 SECOND    AND timestamp <= toDateTime('<end_time>') + INTERVAL 100 SECOND    AND properties.$session_id IS NOT NULLGROUP BY session_idORDER BY event_count DESCLIMIT 10

Continue only when one session ID clearly matches. Use it for the Step 2 and Step 3 queries only. The replay URL and all Replay Vision calls take the recording id.

Step 3 — Check for linked error tracking issues

If the recording has console errors or exceptions, find related error tracking issues:

sql
posthog:execute-sqlSELECT DISTINCT    properties.$exception_fingerprint AS fingerprint,    properties.$exception_types[1] AS type,    properties.$exception_values[1] AS message,    count() AS occurrencesFROM eventsWHERE $session_id = '<session_id>'    AND event = '$exception'GROUP BY fingerprint, type, messageORDER BY occurrences DESCLIMIT 10

If fingerprints are found, search for the corresponding error tracking issues to provide links and status:

json
posthog:query-error-tracking-issues-list{  "searchQuery": "<exception_type or message>"}

Step 4 — Synthesize the investigation

Present the findings as a coherent narrative:

  1. Who — person properties (name, email, country, plan, etc.)
  2. What — sequence of pages visited and key actions taken
  3. Problems — exceptions, console errors, rage clicks, and their frequency
  4. Related issues — linked error tracking issues with their status (active/resolved)
  5. Context — session duration, device/browser, activity score

Optional: AI summary via Replay Vision

If the user wants a deeper analysis without reading through events manually, offer a Replay Vision summary. Follow "check-then-scan" — don't scan blindly, a scanner can only observe a given session once.

  1. Check for an existing summary. A scheduled scanner may already have one:

    json
    posthog:vision-observations-list{  "session_id": "<session_id>"}

    Look for an observation where scanner_snapshot.scanner_type is summarizer and status is succeeded. If found, read scanner_result.model_output (title, summary, intent, outcome, friction_points, keywords) — done, no new scan needed.

  2. Find a summarizer scanner if none exists yet:

    json
    posthog:vision-scanners-list{  "scanner_type": "summarizer"}
    • Exactly one → use it.
    • More than one → show the user the scanners (name + prompt) and ask which to use.
    • None → no summarizer scanner exists. See No summarizer scanner? Run a temporary one below.
  3. Scan the session with the chosen scanner. Warn this is async and takes several minutes (rasterize + LLM):

    json
    posthog:vision-scanners-scan-session{  "id": "<scanner_id>",  "session_id": "<session_id>"}
  4. Retrieve the result by polling vision-observations-list (step 1) until the new observation reaches succeeded.

No summarizer scanner? Run a temporary one

If the project has no summarizer scanner, you can still produce a one-off summary with a throwaway scanner — but ask the user's permission before creating anything.

  1. Ask permission to create a temporary summarizer scanner just to summarize this one session.

  2. Create it disabled so it never sweeps on a schedule — a disabled scanner only runs when you trigger it on demand, so it won't touch other sessions or burn quota in the background:

    json
    posthog:vision-scanners-create{  "name": "Temporary on-demand summary",  "scanner_type": "summarizer",  "scanner_config": {    "prompt": "Summarize what the user was trying to do, whether they succeeded, and any friction they hit."  },  "query": { "kind": "RecordingsQuery" },  "model": "gemini-3-flash-preview",  "enabled": false}
  3. Scan this session on demand with the new scanner, then poll for the result:

    json
    posthog:vision-scanners-scan-session{  "id": "<new_scanner_id>",  "session_id": "<session_id>"}

    Poll vision-observations-list until the observation reaches succeeded and read scanner_result.model_output.

  4. Ask whether to keep or delete the scanner. Once you have the observation, ask the user if they want to keep the temporary scanner or delete it with vision-scanners-delete. Deleting is safe: the summary you just read is also emitted as an event that persists after the scanner is gone, so cleaning up the temporary scanner does not lose the result.

Tips

  • Run steps 1-3 in parallel when possible — they're independent queries.
  • If the recording has very few events, the session was likely very short. Note this rather than suggesting something is broken.
  • Console error count from the recording metadata is a good signal for whether to dig into exceptions. If it's 0, skip step 3.
  • The start_url from the recording tells you where the user's journey began — use this to frame the narrative.
  • If person is null on the recording, the user was anonymous. Person properties won't be available, but events still are.

Related skills

  • finding-sessions-to-watch — choose which sessions are worth investigating in the first place
  • finding-replay-for-issue — start from an error tracking issue and find its linked recordings
  • diagnosing-missing-recordings — when a recording that should exist doesn't
  • creating-replay-vision-scanners — automate this kind of watching as a scheduled scanner

来源与署名

来源:PostHog/ai-plugin位于skills/investigating-replay提交469d177

许可证: 无许可证

内容归原作者所有。SourceWeft 从公开仓库中收录这些内容。

举报或申请下架

更多来自 PostHog/ai-plugin 的技能

Writing Simplified Technical English

PostHog

应用 ASD-STE100 简化技术英语规则,让智能体撰写的文字含义明确、便于执行。

Writing & Content2026年10月8日

Working With Task Comments

PostHog

通过 PostHog MCP exec 调度器读取并解读 PostHog 任务、产物和画布上的评论。

Productivity & Workflow2026年10月8日

Working With Skills

PostHog

指导智能体使用 PostHog 的 skill-* MCP 工具来发现、读取、创建、更新和重构技能。

AI & Agents2026年10月8日

Working With Scouts

PostHog

关于如何把监控任务委派给 PostHog Signals 侦察代理、处理其报告并长期调校整个代理集群的操作手册。

AI & Agents2026年10月8日

Validating And Publishing Canvases

PostHog

Validate and publish a canvas source project safely: the source-project shape, declared capabilities, reading the current version pointer, iterating on validation diagnostics, guarded publishing with expected_current_version_id, staging a draft build and promoting it, waiting out the queued build, and recovering from a 409 version_conflict or a 429 capacity limit without overwriting concurrent work. Use whenever a canvas edit is ready to save, a draft build is wanted, a canvas publish or build returns diagnostics or a conflict, or a task needs to understand canvas version history.

待分类2026年10月8日

Understanding Billing Usage

PostHog

Explains PostHog billing usage and spend from the customer's visible Billing MCP tools. Use when the user asks why usage or spend is high, which product or project is driving usage, what a usage type means, how to reduce usage, what changed over time, why they got a usage change alert, or whether a spike/drop alert was real or noisy. Also use before product-specific analytics skills when the user names a billable PostHog product metric such as events, recordings, feature flag requests, exceptions, survey responses, synced rows, logs, AI events, AI credits, or Inbox credits. Starts from Billing usage/spend tools, then routes to customer-visible product MCP surfaces for deeper investigation.

待分类2026年10月8日